Comments on: 7PM Project’s bad ratings night

By: JH

JH — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:20:11 +0000

I love the 7pm project but maybe it appeals to a different audience than Ch. 10 usually attracts – I think it’s the best thing they have.

By: Mick RWC

Mick RWC — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:54:11 +0000

Hey anon,
Other posters here have expressed similar views (posts 10,12,15,16,21,29&30)
How is it that you chose to personally attack someone who dared to show their political colours while not having the courage to do the same?
Why not take the piss out of Mr Staker?

By: Mick RWC

Mick RWC — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:43:29 +0000

Hey anon,

RWC is Latin for rational, objective and fair .
Unlike anon which must stand for “I’m too gutless to say who I am while making a personal attack.”

By: Xavier

Xavier — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:27:24 +0000

Mr. P. I. Staker….I’m with you…whats it gonna cost and how do we go about obtaining these shares ?

By: Xavier

Xavier — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:26:18 +0000

I love how people say the 7pm show requires brainpower ? How exactly does this work ?
Why…because they are dressed in suits and act like pompous dicks ? I’m pretty sure that doesnt equate to brain capacity. How much brainpower would one need to listen to Dave Hughes….was he ever funny ?

By: Mr. P. I. Staker

Mr. P. I. Staker — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:55:05 +0000

how many shares in ch.10 do i have to buy to take this c**p of the air??

By: Mr. P. I. Staker

Mr. P. I. Staker — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:48:24 +0000

why oh why doesn’t ch. 10 realise that this show is no good!! or is it purley to meet australian content on the channel?
scores of people that i know tune in to the “fat kid show” on ch 9 myself included a showi’d never watched until the 7pm project..

By: Anon

Anon — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:00:00 +0000

Hey Mick … what does the RWC stand for? Right Wing Clown? Rove’s Walking Critiquer? Raving Wanker Cretin?

By: Mick RWC

Mick RWC — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:37:16 +0000

I think the concept is good; a news program with talkback. Problem is, it’s all one sided views. If they had intelligent & informed views from both sides of politics, then that will fill a huge gap in Australian media: fair debate.

But Rove being the quintessential Gen Y personality with much media clout and decided left-wing bias, has produced a poor format: a no-personality lead, a fool comedian and a not-so informed female, all of the same political persuasion = failure.
Rove was on-target with the concept & format, but off with staffing choice & bias.

By: Anon

Anon — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:39:03 +0000

You know what I don’t get? How a TV programme that gets half a million viewers in 30 minutes is a failure, yet a website that gets (say) a quarter of a million people in a month is a success. Go figure.

By: angus

angus — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:17:13 +0000

i’am a fan of the 7pm project as well as over half a million other people

By: David

David — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:08:53 +0000

The list of most watched programmes confirms that TV watchers are very easily pleased. What an embarrassment.

By: Ventura Spleen

Ventura Spleen — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:24:36 +0000

Hey A leave futurama outta this!!!

By: Shelley

Shelley — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:14:07 +0000

The poor quality of Australian free to air TV programs and the poor reception of digital TV channels (every time the wind blows hard you have no signal reception!) is the reason pay TV is so popular.

By: MattR

MattR — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:26:53 +0000

Maybe if the 7PM project wasn’t just a boring mass of political correctness it would do better. The sooner the MSM realise that most of the population don’t agree with their leftarded views the sooner they will create shows that rate better.