Comments on: Anti social media (part 1067) Silkcharm vs Warlach

By: #howl / Renai LeMay

#howl / Renai LeMay — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:59:02 +0000

[...] soliloquies, who were expelled from the ranks of social media experts for crazy & publishing obscene polls on whether @silkcharm is a sandwich, who endlessly debated the merits of #openinternet versus [...]

By: agent-x

agent-x — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:22:07 +0000

Google led me here after I searched for sandwiches.
Where are they?
Why would google lie to me?

By: Zac Martin

Zac Martin — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:55:41 +0000

More posts like this please Timbles. Seriously.

By: DIDOMAN

DIDOMAN — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:53:17 +0000

Being un-followed isn’t that bad, I always find it amusing at what list name people put you in. I’m still waiting for someone to list me under “Hot guy I met on Twitter”…

By: Tom Dodson

Tom Dodson — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:13:13 +0000

Wow, both Kimberly and Juliana really are going over the top a little here. I certainly found this interesting… certainly interesting enough to read it, which surely is the entire point of a blog like this.

I do find it interesting that both Kimberly and Juliana here both have no identifying links to their name. Me-thinks they might be the same person? (laurel Papworth?)

By: Anonymous_Coward

Anonymous_Coward — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:08:21 +0000

@Scott
No, follow the sandal!

By: Kimberley

Kimberley — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:53:37 +0000

Agree with Juliana, above. Think its kind of ridiculous that this would be posted here – regardless of being ‘social media’. Surely there are a LOT more stories happening under this ‘umbrella’ but instead, you lower yousrelf, and your credibility to point fun at someone, with an ‘amusing’ (not at all) twitpoll. Disappointing.

By: Tracey

Tracey — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:54:30 +0000

I reckon if a lot more of the people who get their knickers in a not over things that are said in the social media world went and grabbed a sandwich before making a comment, Australia’s breadmakers would be whooping it up due to the profits and everyone would sit back down at their desks with a full tum and a bit less aggro.

By: Larry

Larry — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:29:26 +0000

what mumbrella and laurel do is completely different … not remotely in the same space.

i kind of get the feeling tim finds laurel tedious and points it out sometimes. fair game i say.

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:27:49 +0000

Well, I don’t know about the machinations of all sides here to ‘own’ social media. But I do know, the posturing of social media ‘experts’ is comedic, and should be ridiculed.

In the meantime, “follow the gourd!”.

By: Juliana

Juliana — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:08:04 +0000

Let’s be clear about what is happening here. Tim Burrowes has some serious issues with Laurel Papworth – I would suspect he sees her as a competitive media threat in the Social Media space which he is desperately trying to own.

So he and his comedic entourage (who are also threatened by her popularity) stalk her and try to dig up ‘anything’ and I mean ‘anything’ as shown by this non-post, to poke fun at her. Really sad for a national blog claiming media & marketing prowess.

There is against whatever he suggests in his preamble & follow-up comments, no humour in Tim’s motivations. As we can see in his poor attempt at explaining social media on Sunrise today, various other heritage media ‘aspirational’ jaunts and here in this blog, he is pretty clueless beyond anything beyond re-publishing old school PR releases – an old school journalist bully, masquerading as someone with vision. Stick to behind the scenes ‘marketing’ editing Tim, I for one would appreciate you keeping away from traditional AND social media and leave it to those who understand it.

By: sven

sven — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:58:34 +0000

god don’t you people have anything better to do with your time.

By: Larry

Larry — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:47:06 +0000

“He does it to women in general, no?”

I love this comment on the Twitter page.

Laurel you are a joke. The real tragedy here is some people actually listen to your insane (or is it inane) ramblings.

By: acatinatree

acatinatree — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:42:08 +0000

I enjoy nothing more than the defiant eating of sandwiches.

Do you see what I did there? I made a snarky comment about a spelling mistake in a comment about a snarky comment about a snarky comment.

Et voilà! the snake eats its own tail.

By: I thought it was funny

I thought it was funny — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:22:07 +0000

Good use of Twt Poll I thought – there defiantly isn’t enough sandwich eating in today’s society. Personally I’m a fan of the good old peanut butter and banana…. although made a recent discovery – toasted honey and walnut sandwich… yummier than it sounds.