Appliances Online sacks agency after bloggers lodge complaints of ‘content theft’
Web retailer Appliances Online has sacked its digital agency after discovering it had ripped off content from bloggers and passed it off as its own.
The electrical goods firm told Mumbrella it terminated the contract with Sydney-based Stencil HQ yesterday with immediate effect, after bloggers posted on its Facebook page accusing it of populating its social media with other people’s content without credit.
One blogger, Nagi Maehashi, said she reported the behaviour to Facebook.
Stencil HQ confirmed today that an investigation had revealed third party content had been used and a member of staff fired as a result.
Maehashi, who runs a blog called Recipe Tin Eat, posted: “This whole page is utilising stolen content. I have reported my content you have stolen to Facebook, as are many other bloggers.
“I hope you are prepared for this page to be shut down as that is the consequence of stealing people’s work. I must say, I’m appalled. I’m an Australian blogger and I’m so disappointed to see a fellow Australian company stealing people’s hard work without giving credit.”
Another post, from Callen Dellar, read: “It would appear that your social media team are doing some very dodging [sic] things using other peoples content and re-badging it as your own….. You have 370,000 likes and are one of the top online stores in Australia, surely you have the marketing budget to come up with your own content. If not at least do the right thing and seek permission from the owner of the content and give them a credit. #socialmediafail.”
Appliances Online chief executive John Winning, who jetted into Australia only yesterday morning from an overseas trip, told Mumbrella that a decision to rip up the contract with Stencil was made by chief marketing officer James Fleet as soon as the claims were verified.
“We contacted Stencil and the moment we discovered the allegations were true we terminated the agreement,” Winning told Mumbrella. “They apologised and told us two juniors had been managing our account at the time. It seems it wasn’t a one-off. It was multiple posts.
“I am extremely disappointed. I have spoken to one of the bloggers who was affected and offered my sincerest apologies. I also gave her my mobile phone number and said if any other blogger affected by this would like to to call me I’ll be happy to personally apologise.”
Winning said he was offering to either remove posts or credit the author.
A statement from Winning, which later appeared on Appliances Online’s Facebook page, said: “It has been brought to our attention that a third party agency working for us has been using content from bloggers without crediting them. We take this matter very seriously and we have terminated the contract with the third party agency, effective immediately.
“We are investigating the situation and are actively working with the bloggers involved to try and rectify the situation. As an online business we hold the utmost respect for all bloggers and would never knowingly post images without consent.”
Stencil managing partner CJ Hudson admitted some content “had not been appropriately credited”.
“This is against our company policy and as a result the individual involved no longer works for us,” he said in a statement. “We have reminded all our employees again about their obligations to credit copyright holders and to develop their own original creative work. We have also reviewed and strengthened our content creation and approval processes.
“We are bitterly disappointed this has resulted in losing our long-term client relationship and apologise to anyone affected by these actions.”
Appliances Online, one of the biggest retailers of electrical goods online in Australia, was founded by Winning in 2005.
He said the incident validates his view that such work should be kept in-house, explaining it began working with Stencil in 2013 when its in-house social media manager left the company.
“I am quite public about being anti outsourcing. We like to be in control of our own destiny and outsourcing is giving away your IP,” he said.
“We had someone in-house managing our social media but when they left we were looking for short term options. Stencil were recommended and they appeared to be doing a reasonable job. We were happy enough and so kept them on.
“It is very rare for us to outsource anything and the one thing we did outsource happens to be the one thing that has let us down”
Steve Jones
Yet another use of the “juniors did it” defence.
DB
User ID not verified.
“They apologised and told us two juniors had been managing our account at the time”… of course they told you that. So sick of companies throwing juniors under the bus. Even if it were true, why the hell would you put juniors in charge of a major clients FB page?
User ID not verified.
SEO white labelling or offshoring solutions gone awry.
User ID not verified.
Well given the huge trashing of experienced silver heads over the last 5years it has to be the juniors, cause that’s who staff agencies and newsrooms, and run SM campaigns (I’m looking at you, Mortein)… This is the generation that did its homework with Google and cut and paste. They actually have no clue they are doing anything wrong… “Original research” means “Google it” to many, many people.
User ID not verified.
CJ’s blog confirms to me that I would keep my IP in-house …
http://www.stencilhq.com/blog/.....f-facebook
User ID not verified.
The problem is, agencies don’t respect blogging enough to pay decent money for it. They offer it, but they don’t understand it yet.
They think it’s as simple as whacking a few words together and sending it off to a magical place called the blogosphere to watch the awards roll in. No regard for SEO and content marketing, let alone attribution versus plagarism.
What I want to know is, if you’re going to do the dodgy brothers version of real work, aren’t you going to be smart enough to use Copyscrape or something similar to make sure your intern hasn’t screwed the pooch?
User ID not verified.
Stop giving so much power to Juniors, you money hungry selfisish people.
Pay appropriate people, appropriate wages and get appropriate work
User ID not verified.
so Stenciled Pulled their website? It is really their junior? What’s going on there. Anyone have an archived version of the site? Their frontend got pulled but you can still see stuff that’s live
http://www.stencilhq.com/blog/.....cebook-ads
User ID not verified.
Well handled by Winning. There are a lot of big-name execs who could learn from his prompt and effective response (and maybe his former agency might learn as well)
User ID not verified.
What a load of handwringing cobblers…
User ID not verified.
A new law of physics: nothing moves faster than a social media agency taking down its website after a public disaster.
http://www.stencilhq.com/
User ID not verified.
@Cannes
“They actually have no clue they are doing anything wrong… “Original research” means “Google it” to many, many people.”
Absolutely false and sensational. The skill and value of professional and academic research is taught consistently in schools and higher education, and heavily monitored thanks to technologies that easily detect plagiarism.
User ID not verified.
Why are juniors always getting the blame? Have some balls Stencil HQ and take responsibility. Someone senior in your company approved it. And do the right thing and compensate the bloggers who were ripped off.
User ID not verified.
So, you could have “Credit” or they’d pull the pieces they’d stolen.
No offer of actual recompense for the value that the content they’ve pulled that’s already been added, though?
User ID not verified.
Have a look at the company culture and incentives that would make a junior think ripping off another website was OK. Time pressure and low pay, anyone? Not excusing their behaviour but these things don’t happen in a vacuum.
User ID not verified.
I’m a blogger and a social media marketer which means I am also responsible for other people’s posts. I take as much care with their social media as my own. So it’s always stop and think twice before posting anything.
Sorry but its the CEO’s ultimate responsibility, not the Juniors for this stuff up.
User ID not verified.
Isn’t this just another version of piracy – something many commenters on Mumbrella seem to be completely at ease with?
User ID not verified.
“had not been appropriately credited”???
No it had in fact been stolen, had the original creators watermarks cropped out and replaced with the clients watermark to make it look like original content then charged the client for it. Morally bankrupt. Let’s hope the rest of their clients follow Winning’s lead.
User ID not verified.
Sacking seems a bit harsh. Appliances Online clearly didn’t value the relationship very highly and it could have been handled better by building processes around source checking. All I’m reading is “looking for short term options”, “doing a reasonable job”, and since when is client “happy enough”?
User ID not verified.
Yeah, agencies have gotta stop offloading social media pages to juniors and interns – it’s really bad management practices. I was handed 6 big brand pages to write for and manage as an intern a couple of years ago. I was given no guidance and no help. When it came time to write reports and what not, I had no idea what to do and I was met with frustration! Dispicable
User ID not verified.
Pay peanuts, get juniors.
User ID not verified.
How on earth is it the CEO’s responsibility? He’s got bigger things to worry about and hires a team to look after this side of the business? Sorry – but agency purely to blame here. You wouldn’t expect your agency to rip off other people’s work and I guarantee that not every in-house manager would double check it – you’d take it as a given.
Also…not all juniors are this incompetent. A little bit of Business 101 would tell you that it’s not right to steal other people’s content…
User ID not verified.
Who at the agency approved the content to go ahead which was produced by the ‘juniors’
User ID not verified.
My best guess? Stencil HQ is one of those “content” agencies which is happy to take clients’ money then outsource to some poor sod in the Philipines for a 10th (or more) of the price, making a hefty profit…Not only is this practice rife in the industry, it’s also been suggested to me (a copywriter) as the best way I can make money in this business. Um, no, not when my clients expect original, quality work….
User ID not verified.
Blaming the juniors makes everyone look like amaeteurs
User ID not verified.
what are the chances of the above comments being knee jerk and from a bias point of view? RJ above seems the only objective one above to read into Mr.Winning’s absence of conviction and leadership when it mattered. Indeed, who exactly forced Appliances Online to Outsource? If you choose to overlook the ‘individual’ that carried out the actions, then you must examine management at every tier. The buck ultimately lies with Appliances Online’s CEO who, I suspect,chose the more economical option and sacrificed control. However, the bigger issue must be that in a world now awash with commentary from many millions of individuals and organisations, there is very little anyone can do to micro-manage such events and actions by individuals. It is the environment we have allowed to be created.
User ID not verified.
Wow social media and experential has had a stellar week. Agree with all the peanuts and monkeys commentary. Clients who assume agencies will live up to promise without due dilligence deserve all they get
User ID not verified.
Due diligence yes, but are you trying to say that a client should check every post by its contractor to make sure they aren’t copying someone else’s work? Really? Is that where we are today?
User ID not verified.
JG: “Isn’t this just another version of piracy – something many commenters on Mumbrella seem to be completely at ease with?”
Yes because copying videos for free personal use is exactly the same thing as using somebody’s work to make money for your business.
User ID not verified.
@fresh meat – bullseye
sometimes i think the only reason agencies hire juniors these days is so because they make great fall-guys (and fall-gals)
User ID not verified.
Thanks for clearing that up Lempiere.
But I just want to make sure that I have got it right. Personal use is OK, use for gain isn’t it.
So if I popped around to your place and ‘borrowed’ you car to earn some spare cash as an Uber driver you would be pissed off with me.
But if I popped around and just borrowed you car and took it joyriding you’d have no issues with that.
User ID not verified.
Have to say I disagree with outsourcing being a bad thing – and yes I work for a third party.
Outsourcing can get you access specialist expertise an organisation may not otherwise have access to and services that in-house staff are unable to provide – scaling at short notice, filling gaps, access to an experienced team rather than just one person.
Agree that greater due diligence is required in agency selection when it comes to social media.
User ID not verified.
@tony j.. The due diligence should ensure that they don’t hire the type of wankers that are capable of damaging their brand through plagiarism.
User ID not verified.
what started as an interesting topic on various levels looks like it just descended into a free for all? I’m intrigued by the ‘juniors’ immunity though? Is it a ‘junior’ at Mumbrella that decided the word Wanker above was apt, relevant and acceptable on what I assume Mumbrella regard as a serious medium for news and communication? Or does a junior and a manager find themselves under the wheels of a bus? Or does it just prove that you cannot micro-manage to this extent? Will Mumbrella print this?
User ID not verified.
another junior under the bus?
Enough said…..http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/.....ar-AAbffMl
User ID not verified.
No matter if some one searches for his vital thing, therefore he/she needs to be available that in detail, thus that thing is maintained over here.
User ID not verified.
What an incredibly low and unprofessional thing to do, blaming “juniors”. As a company that solely relies on making content and consulting for other companies, your number 1 job is to make sure that what you put out there is lawfully correct. The “junior” here is not to blame, it’s the team leader and his/her boss that is solely to blame for this.
The “junior” in that company must have been trained (and if she wasn’t trained, then you have more problems on your hands than just a mistake, you need to rethink your whole management process) and if he/she was trained, then why did the team leader not pick up on this? This didn’t happen just once, as we read in this article. Where the hell was the team leader or his/her boss, when content was written? Why was this not double-checked?
You cannot blame YOUR mistake on other people. It was YOUR job to ensure you correctly train and mentor your “juniors” and blaming them for your mistakes is the ultimate unprofessionalism.
User ID not verified.