<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coke&#8217;s phoney happiness machine is a fail for me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813</link>
	<description>Everything under Australia’s media and marketing umbrella</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:05:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stig Richards</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-30897</link>
		<dc:creator>Stig Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-30897</guid>
		<description>Just not that bad. It&#039;s an ad without music or a super.

I was more concerned it would somehow detract from &#039;Happiness Factory&#039; and it didn&#039;t so that&#039;s OK.

Great? No. 

Unsuccessful? No.

Rubbish? No.

Worth an article and subsequent discussion? Yes.

Was I a bit late to the discussion? Absolutely.

Stig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just not that bad. It&#8217;s an ad without music or a super.</p>
<p>I was more concerned it would somehow detract from &#8216;Happiness Factory&#8217; and it didn&#8217;t so that&#8217;s OK.</p>
<p>Great? No. </p>
<p>Unsuccessful? No.</p>
<p>Rubbish? No.</p>
<p>Worth an article and subsequent discussion? Yes.</p>
<p>Was I a bit late to the discussion? Absolutely.</p>
<p>Stig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Richardson</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29836</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29836</guid>
		<description>Good point Carl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Carl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Uvesten</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29773</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Uvesten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29773</guid>
		<description>This Coke ad defintely breaks the rules that used to apply for viral, but probably for the better. The initial brand virals that came around looked authentic. With Ray Ban, Levis, Morrissey etc we have rapidly become cynical about anything that looks too good to be true or in anyway can connect to a brand. Even Kochie on 7&#039;s Sunrise is now having doubts over certain YouTube videos they&#039;re showing.

Everything evolves. The old viral format might be dead. It only lasted for so long. It might even cause a backlash nowadays. As much as I did enjoy them, i don&#039;t anymore. At least this Coke video is completely open and honest and is more focused on the idea/message rather than execution.

I still think it&#039;s a lame video, but not because it&#039;s breaking old &quot;viral rules&quot;. 

Virus evolves. That&#039;s why our immune system can&#039;t keep up, causing us to catch the flu each year. The same must apply to marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Coke ad defintely breaks the rules that used to apply for viral, but probably for the better. The initial brand virals that came around looked authentic. With Ray Ban, Levis, Morrissey etc we have rapidly become cynical about anything that looks too good to be true or in anyway can connect to a brand. Even Kochie on 7&#8242;s Sunrise is now having doubts over certain YouTube videos they&#8217;re showing.</p>
<p>Everything evolves. The old viral format might be dead. It only lasted for so long. It might even cause a backlash nowadays. As much as I did enjoy them, i don&#8217;t anymore. At least this Coke video is completely open and honest and is more focused on the idea/message rather than execution.</p>
<p>I still think it&#8217;s a lame video, but not because it&#8217;s breaking old &#8220;viral rules&#8221;. </p>
<p>Virus evolves. That&#8217;s why our immune system can&#8217;t keep up, causing us to catch the flu each year. The same must apply to marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rae</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29699</link>
		<dc:creator>Rae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29699</guid>
		<description>If the agency had intentionally manipulated the video to mimic the viral videos (shoddy production values, lack of branding, no cheesy happy message) then we would all be criticising the lack of disclosure.

As much as i think &#039;Happiness Machine&#039; is a lame title, I still watched (and enjoyed) the video from start to finish. And for a digital social media campaign, i would say 1.3million plus youtube hits with 5000+ 5 star ratings is a pretty good outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the agency had intentionally manipulated the video to mimic the viral videos (shoddy production values, lack of branding, no cheesy happy message) then we would all be criticising the lack of disclosure.</p>
<p>As much as i think &#8216;Happiness Machine&#8217; is a lame title, I still watched (and enjoyed) the video from start to finish. And for a digital social media campaign, i would say 1.3million plus youtube hits with 5000+ 5 star ratings is a pretty good outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When is a viral video not a viral video?</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29697</link>
		<dc:creator>When is a viral video not a viral video?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29697</guid>
		<description>[...] that may seem a snide comment. But this post over at Mumbrella from Tony Richardson really does seem a denial in the face of reality. While you should visit the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that may seem a snide comment. But this post over at Mumbrella from Tony Richardson really does seem a denial in the face of reality. While you should visit the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David@luvyawork</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29632</link>
		<dc:creator>David@luvyawork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29632</guid>
		<description>@JacketandCoat,

The Carlton Draught pieces were near the first ones where I got the concept of viral bed down in my head.

They&#039;re still a benchmark, in my opinion, for the kind of communication that will be passed on, thereby making it &quot;viral&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JacketandCoat,</p>
<p>The Carlton Draught pieces were near the first ones where I got the concept of viral bed down in my head.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re still a benchmark, in my opinion, for the kind of communication that will be passed on, thereby making it &#8220;viral&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JacketandCoat</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29620</link>
		<dc:creator>JacketandCoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29620</guid>
		<description>Just have to add another example of a viral ad that doesn&#039;t conform to Tony&#039;s &#039;rules&#039;....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGJiTpBBD18

Pretty popular and definitely a viral in that is was released on the internet way before it ever went to TV.

Also looks pretty professionally shot to my untrained eye...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just have to add another example of a viral ad that doesn&#8217;t conform to Tony&#8217;s &#8216;rules&#8217;&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGJiTpBBD18" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGJiTpBBD18</a></p>
<p>Pretty popular and definitely a viral in that is was released on the internet way before it ever went to TV.</p>
<p>Also looks pretty professionally shot to my untrained eye&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lachyw</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29516</link>
		<dc:creator>Lachyw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29516</guid>
		<description>btw Tony Richardson are you on crack?

That Arts Council piece is shot FAR more professionally than the Coke piece - time-lapse photography, camera shots from overhead, artistic angles and cut aways (I have no idea what you actually call this stuff in &quot;the industry&quot;). Plus a hip soundtrack. I&#039;d say it is SUPER SLICK, and not particularly restrained from a creative perspective.

You really do seem utterly out of your depth on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw Tony Richardson are you on crack?</p>
<p>That Arts Council piece is shot FAR more professionally than the Coke piece &#8211; time-lapse photography, camera shots from overhead, artistic angles and cut aways (I have no idea what you actually call this stuff in &#8220;the industry&#8221;). Plus a hip soundtrack. I&#8217;d say it is SUPER SLICK, and not particularly restrained from a creative perspective.</p>
<p>You really do seem utterly out of your depth on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lachyw</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29514</link>
		<dc:creator>Lachyw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29514</guid>
		<description>Tony Richardson&#039;s website says, and I quote:

&quot;we do NOT use cookie cutter presenters or formats&quot;

along with a nice picture of a crossed out ginger bread man cookie cutter.

But here Tony is telling us all &quot;successful&quot; virals are cut from the same cloth (or is that cookie?).

Totally agree with all who&#039;ve said that the true measure of success is... success. And on all the logical KPIs, this was pretty successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony Richardson&#8217;s website says, and I quote:</p>
<p>&#8220;we do NOT use cookie cutter presenters or formats&#8221;</p>
<p>along with a nice picture of a crossed out ginger bread man cookie cutter.</p>
<p>But here Tony is telling us all &#8220;successful&#8221; virals are cut from the same cloth (or is that cookie?).</p>
<p>Totally agree with all who&#8217;ve said that the true measure of success is&#8230; success. And on all the logical KPIs, this was pretty successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29510</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 05:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29510</guid>
		<description>Assuming this viral was speaking to US college kids only then I think it&#039;s pretty successful. If I was judging it in an award show against the recent VW Fun Theory work (http://www.thefuntheory.com/) it would not compete. Why? Because the execution isn&#039;t as good and the idea that little less original. 

All that said, kudos to Tony for a sound argument on how and when to use viral media. The coke idea would have worked better if they actually recruited consumers in placing the free coke in their dorms. It&#039;s not too late for them to do that either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming this viral was speaking to US college kids only then I think it&#8217;s pretty successful. If I was judging it in an award show against the recent VW Fun Theory work (<a href="http://www.thefuntheory.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefuntheory.com/</a>) it would not compete. Why? Because the execution isn&#8217;t as good and the idea that little less original. </p>
<p>All that said, kudos to Tony for a sound argument on how and when to use viral media. The coke idea would have worked better if they actually recruited consumers in placing the free coke in their dorms. It&#8217;s not too late for them to do that either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gezza</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29481</link>
		<dc:creator>Gezza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29481</guid>
		<description>Tony:

The Arts coiuncil spot is BORING!  I cant&#039; imagine anyone volutarilty sending this to a friend.  Unless of course they want to show how to scam the arts council into giving a grant for some meaningless artistic endeavour.  I guess the people who produced/wrote this are - like you - experts in the field of viral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony:</p>
<p>The Arts coiuncil spot is BORING!  I cant&#8217; imagine anyone volutarilty sending this to a friend.  Unless of course they want to show how to scam the arts council into giving a grant for some meaningless artistic endeavour.  I guess the people who produced/wrote this are &#8211; like you &#8211; experts in the field of viral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Richardson</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29475</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29475</guid>
		<description>At the risk of infuriating some readers further I have a little more to add.

A great example of what I’m trying to say can be found in Mumbrella in the News section. The piece highlighting Cabana Boys’ clever Arts Council viral ad illustrates my point. 

1. Branding is left until right at the very end. Most free to air TVCs have branding all the way through. 

2. The shooting, while done by Briony Forbes, one of the best in the business, is restrained and far from slick.

3. And finally the whole thing is an ‘event’ that lasts two whole minutes.

Try selling that to Coke (or nearly any marketer who is paying for the media) as a TV spot and see long the meeting lasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of infuriating some readers further I have a little more to add.</p>
<p>A great example of what I’m trying to say can be found in Mumbrella in the News section. The piece highlighting Cabana Boys’ clever Arts Council viral ad illustrates my point. </p>
<p>1. Branding is left until right at the very end. Most free to air TVCs have branding all the way through. </p>
<p>2. The shooting, while done by Briony Forbes, one of the best in the business, is restrained and far from slick.</p>
<p>3. And finally the whole thing is an ‘event’ that lasts two whole minutes.</p>
<p>Try selling that to Coke (or nearly any marketer who is paying for the media) as a TV spot and see long the meeting lasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mumbrella</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29440</link>
		<dc:creator>mumbrella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29440</guid>
		<description>Hi Adrian (5.10pm)

No need to be defensive from me - I didn&#039;t write the piece. Indeed, as I made clear in the first comment I didn&#039;t necessarily even agree with it.

However, I don&#039;t want all of our guest posts to only reflect my view - that would be a bit boring. Tony&#039;s experienced enough to take a view, and I&#039;m interested to hear what he has to say.

Cheers,

Tim - Mumbrella</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adrian (5.10pm)</p>
<p>No need to be defensive from me &#8211; I didn&#8217;t write the piece. Indeed, as I made clear in the first comment I didn&#8217;t necessarily even agree with it.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t want all of our guest posts to only reflect my view &#8211; that would be a bit boring. Tony&#8217;s experienced enough to take a view, and I&#8217;m interested to hear what he has to say.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Tim &#8211; Mumbrella</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spunky1972</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29373</link>
		<dc:creator>Spunky1972</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29373</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think they seemed like they were acting.  And if they were, they were very convincing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think they seemed like they were acting.  And if they were, they were very convincing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beaudacious</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/cokes-phoney-happiness-machine-is-a-fail-for-me-16813#comment-29371</link>
		<dc:creator>Beaudacious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=16813#comment-29371</guid>
		<description>That was a dumb point Beaudacious.

Saying that, I still think regardless of intent, to echo the point by @Clare - 1.2m hits is a success in my book</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a dumb point Beaudacious.</p>
<p>Saying that, I still think regardless of intent, to echo the point by @Clare &#8211; 1.2m hits is a success in my book</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

