<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commercial TV networks to make $240m saving from licence fee rebate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mumbrella.com.au/commercial-tv-licence-fee-rebate-to-protect-local-content-17523/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/commercial-tv-licence-fee-rebate-to-protect-local-content-17523</link>
	<description>Everything under Australia’s media and marketing umbrella</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:03:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stokes: Too busy skiing to talk shop - mUmBRELLA</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/commercial-tv-licence-fee-rebate-to-protect-local-content-17523#comment-31420</link>
		<dc:creator>Stokes: Too busy skiing to talk shop - mUmBRELLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=17523#comment-31420</guid>
		<description>[...] while both were on holiday took place just weeks before the government announced it would give free-to-air networks a licence fee rebate worth up to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while both were on holiday took place just weeks before the government announced it would give free-to-air networks a licence fee rebate worth up to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free TV&#8217;s sweet deal may whiff, but so does The Oz&#8217;s second bite - mUmBRELLA</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/commercial-tv-licence-fee-rebate-to-protect-local-content-17523#comment-30226</link>
		<dc:creator>Free TV&#8217;s sweet deal may whiff, but so does The Oz&#8217;s second bite - mUmBRELLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=17523#comment-30226</guid>
		<description>[...] enough &#8211; it&#8217;s an important issue (and something of a murky one at that). Mumbrella reported on it on Monday and was suitably sceptical about the spin that this was about som..., pointing out that no new standards were attached. it was obviosu from the start that a political [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] enough &#8211; it&#8217;s an important issue (and something of a murky one at that). Mumbrella reported on it on Monday and was suitably sceptical about the spin that this was about som&#8230;, pointing out that no new standards were attached. it was obviosu from the start that a political [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

