Cricket broadcast rights could go cheap
While negotiations for the sporting rights to cricket are ongoing, many media insiders are tipping that the rights will be retained by Nine.
Betting agency Sportsbet has even opened a market on the negotiations offering just $1.15 for long-term rights holder Channel Nine to retain the rights, $5 for Ten and $9 on Seven.
“The cricket is in Nine’s DNA so we expect they will simply match any offer another broadcaster might put forward,” said Ben Hawkes, a spokesman for Sportsbet.
“Seven has the tennis and focuses heavily on that and as a result is the outside option in betting.”
Nine and the other networks all declined to comment on the basis that negotiations are ongoing. However, the negotiations are occurring in what many analysts say is a weak market for sports rights, given the current financial positions of Nine and Ten.
In mid-January, Seven announced it would continue to broadcast the V8 Supercars with the network paying $18m for a two-year broadcast deal, down from $28m for three years under the previous deal.
Many in the industry say the lower price reflects the lack of competitive tension in the current market.
Another area to watch is whether pay TV sports channel Fox Sports retains the rights to the Big Bash or whether those rights are shared with Nine, possibly on one of its digital channels.
Media analyst Steve Allen says the Big Bash is extremely important to the channel’s subscription model.
“Advertising, and therefore audience, isn’t a big feature of the overall Fox Sport revenue mix,” says Allen, the director of Fusion Strategy.
“They might not gain any more by having to pay a lot more for the rights. But they sure as hell will lose if they don’t have them,” he said. “That is because the average revenue per customer is so high in this country [Fox Sports] can get back their investment quite quickly.”
Nic Christensen
This feature first appeared in the tablet edition of Encore. To download click on the links below.
Online trading is the next big thing says Rob Atkinson in a piece that first appeared in
Is the best way of being successful in Australia not be here at all? In a feature that first appeared in
From journos to ad execs and PRs, these days everyone seems to have a book in them. But what does it take to get published and will you actually make any money? In a feature that first appeared in
In an article that first appeared in
From dressing the part to playing the gatekeeper, Leo Burnett Sydney’s Susie Henry tells us how to make it as the face of adland in a piece that first appeared in 
Government funding bodies are lazy and decadent, says industry veteran Michael Thornhill but in a piece that first appeared in
Life is sweet for freelance writer Max Kitchen, but in a feature that first appeared in
First there was the Grand Prix. Next came the reported $500m bid for cricket rights, then Ten secured the 2014 winter Olympics. So, can sport save the ailing network? In a feature that first appeared in 

Cosmo’s Kate Leaver tells us how to bluff it in her job in a feature that first appeared in
Hi Chris,
Brett Clegg, group director – business media, Fairfax Media, in a Q&A that first appeared in 


Comments
7 Feb 13
2:30 pm
Please don’t report on anything that sport betting agencies say about anything to do with sport – everyone has been had and we ought now encourage this lowlife activity.
7 Feb 13
11:03 pm
Why does the media report in what the bookies have as odds as part of a news story? All it is a free plug for them. There is no news worthiness in the odds provided from bookies. The bookies don’t have a clue all they are trying to do is create a mathmatical market for themeselves with mugs. Its a pet hate of mine with the media giving odds from bookies as part of story.
Why do it?