Disclosure in Social Media: How transparent should bloggers be?
In this guest post, blogger and digital creative Laura McWhinnie argues for more disclosure in the bloggersphere.
The bloggersphere has always been a bit like the Wild West. Bloggers could post about products to their heart’s content without having to disclose their relationship with the brand. This meant that consumers had no idea who was behind the marketing messages influencing their purchasing decisions. But in 2009 that all changed
when for the first time in more than three decades, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of America implemented their Guide to Endorsements and Testimonials in advertising.
On March 12 this year, the FTC ramped things up with the release of their updated .Com Disclosures – a report that addresses issues surrounding disclosures in social, mobile, and other digital channels.
When it was last updated back in 2000, social platforms like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram didn’t exist. The updated report cracks down on everything from the inefficiency of using the #SPON hashtag to denote a sponsored tweet, to the placement, proximity and prominence of required disclosures on a blog.
The FTC compliance is an important reason for bloggers to disclose, but it also comes down to trust and transparency. If you’re working with brands under the table, it can completely undermine the credibility and reputation you’ve been trying to build. While there is currently no law in Australia requiring a blogger to disclose when they are being paid or compensated as part of their work for a brand, the disclosure discussion continues to spark debate.
If you’re a blogger and unsure about how to handle sponsored content, get started by following these three rules:
1. Disclose everything
We all saw the trouble the South Australia Tourism Commission got into after the Kangaroo Island cash for tweet disaster where Australian celebrities including Matt Moran and Shannon Noll were paid $750 to tweet about the destination. While many believe that all publicity is good publicity, consumers felt duped by the celebrities, resulting in more than 300 damaging tweets. It wasn’t illegal by Australian standards and it got people talking, but just how much damage did South Australia Tourism Commission do to their brand through their lack of transparency?
2. Use a third-party service
Disclosure is a grey area for bloggers for a reason. What exactly counts as ‘payment’ for a blog post or a tweet? If someone buys you a coffee and you go on to write a blog post about their brand do you disclose it? What if you’re gifted a product after writing about it on your own accord? Clearing the confusion is US-based company CMP.LY. They’ve set out to become the industry standard for disclosure by providing a consistent and audited framework that’s free for bloggers. They use eight types of CMP.LY disclosures that you can insert into websites and social media posts. For example, I recently borrowed an inflatable Giant Swan to shoot for a blog post that I was then allowed to keep and disclosed it here. It’s also a valuable tool for agencies and brands to measure how many times a single blog post has been viewed.
3. Stay true to your brand
Only work with brands you love and products you believe in. The best part about running your own site is having complete editorial control over its content. This allows you to build trust with your readers – something far more valuable than making a quick buck or getting a bunch of freebies. If you go down the path of making compromises in exchange for money or product, you’re going to seriously affect the integrity of your blog. Your readers follow you for your opinion, so you can’t expect them to be interested in something you’re not.
- Laura McWhinnie is a digital creative and runs her own blog This Island Life.
- Next month’s Mumbrella360 will discuss the regulation of social media following new guidance from the AANA and IAB.
Paid bloggers have been a dirty secret for a number of years.
If it’s immoral for John Laws to spruke his private sponsors on radio without disclosure, then the same is true for bloggers.
But when I’ve suggested this to various digital media bods over the years, they virtually froth at the mouth and trot out the old “you don’t understand digital’ tripe.
User ID not verified.
I’ve been blogging since 2006 and I’m GLAD that we now have to disclose any sponsored posts.
As a journalist, I get sent so many products through the post, do I think I should have to declare they were free if do a post on them (since I’m technically not being paid) – no I don’t. Do I declare it? Yes, I do.
I think it’s extremely important to be transparent. You don’t see an advertorial in the newspaper without it stating that it’s an advert so it should be the same across all media boards.
Plus, why be ashamed of it?If you’re collaborating with a brand – stand tall – you’re clearly happy to take their cash.
User ID not verified.
Section 18 of the ACL prohibits a person, in trade or commerce, from engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct. This prohibition is not limited to the supply of goods or services and creates a broad, economy-wide norm of conduct.
So bloggers might get in trouble if they have any revenue whatsoever, as they may be viewed as engaging in ‘trade or commerce’.
User ID not verified.
I am astounded that the idea of having to disclose a potential conflict of interest even needs discussion. It it ignorance (which can be fixed with knowledge) or plain old moral and ethical bankruptcy (which can also be fixed, with a baseball bat) that causes people to imagine they might not disclose this stuff?
User ID not verified.
This article about disclosure includes a plug for third-party-disclosure-manager website cmp.ly… the details of which are undisclosed?
User ID not verified.
This leads in to the whole tax issue for bloggers.
Gifts are considered income but I bet most bloggers fail to disclose the Red Rockport shoes that were “gifted” by Foot Locker, or the $100 gift voucher they were given by Sportscraft etc etc.
Which brings me to another point, why do bloggers say something was “gifted” do they think that saying gift makes us not think they were paid to write about it?
Brands also need to be way more selective with their blogger campaigns. When I read 4 or more bloggers all talking about the fabulous washable rockport shoes they love to death then I know that
A. Rockport is paying bloggers in goods
B. All the bloggers belong to the same blogger agency.
Sort of loses its impact after the 3rd blogger tells me about the great new shoes
User ID not verified.
@Jackson Because being ‘gifted’ a product is completely different to getting paid to promote a brand. Bloggers get sent products as gifts all the time that we are under no obligation to write about or promote.
User ID not verified.
Jackson,
Seems to me that Rockport must have done a great job with their campaign, as you’re pretty clear on the brand benefit of those “fabulous washable rockport shoes”.
#justsayin #thismessageisnotsponsored
Jo
User ID not verified.
Jo, you are making the assumption that so many mummy bloggers all talking about the same product in the same week would make me want to buy it, when the opposite is in fact true.
Because I can see that it is over saturated I will make a point of avoiding that brand.
So actually it is a marketing fail.
It works against the company, yes I remember the name, but only so I can avoid it.
Not the marketing recognition any brand wants, and I know for a fact from other places I read, it has had the exact same impact on many many others.
@Laura, but when you DO write about it, it becomes a financial in kind transaction and becomes taxable and no longer a gift, so the fact you are writing about it means you have entered into a contract with that brand and you have received monetary value for your opinion, therefore the item is no longer “gifted”
So saying something that you have just written about and saying it was “gifted” is still wrong.
User ID not verified.
@Jackson strange, I would just call that another way of gaining Reach & Frequency as part of a broader campaign. You must then hate watching the same old TVC being repeated over and over and over and over again when you’re on the tube. And those bus shelters that you see that have the same creative when you drive too and from work must be really annoying to you.
At least in this context it’s original content, and done in an advertorial context.
User ID not verified.
I wholeheartedly disagree, with all and sundry. In a perfect world, Alan Jones and Ray Hadley could possibly be held to the same standard as small time small business bookkeeper like myself, however, lets get REAL here….Please!
I would seriously doubt that the small business punter in Sydney, would have the time for the “niceties” that corporations and their hired marketing extend to each other.
Here in small business land, we are just flat out making ends meet.
User ID not verified.
@Laura thanks for the mention. BTW, we love your posts from Down Under and we wish that we had an inflatable swan here in NY as we kick off our Summer season in the Northern Hemisphere.
@Omega there is no disclosure needed for Laura’s plug of CMP.LY since she is a user of CMP.LY’s services giving an honest review/testimonial based upon actual experience. We do not incentivize her or provide her with our products as part of a marketing initiative. She is simply using our free product for individuals.
Note that we will be updating our badges in the coming weeks to make them more readable and informative. More updates to follow…
User ID not verified.
@ Hornsby Girl, I would agree with you regarding receiving goods and reviewing them. All rather petty and not worth declaring in my view.
My issue is with a number of high profile bloggers who I know have received substantial amounts of money to be “ambassadors” of brands, and these have not always been declared.
In my view, Bloggers gain a reputation for interesting, relevant, and independent opinion. Where those opinions are paid for under the table and not declared, then that is dishonest. When it IS declared, then they are nothing more than cheap mouth pieces
User ID not verified.
@CMP.LY Thank you for making it so easy to disclose everything now! Can’t wait to see the new badge updates. Have a great summer 🙂
User ID not verified.