The curious case of Droga5’s disappearing Sydney office
Ad agencies over the years have come in for criticism for air-brushing their clients’ flaws, but it seems Droga5 has been indulging in a little air-brushing of its own, removing all traces of its defunct Sydney office from its Wikipedia page.
Similarly agency founder David Droga’s page has been carefully altered to avoid all mention of the office set up in his home town, which ran for seven years and employed dozens of Australia’s finest creatives and handled some of the biggest ad accounts in the country.
Fortunately, for Dr Mumbo the online encyclopedia does allow users to track who made the changes to pages, which makes for interesting reading.
The first to be ‘managed’ was that of Droga on October 14, just a month after the closure of the Sydney shop was announced. The entry was updated from: “After two years of operating from a single global office, Droga5 opened a Sydney location in 2008, led by Chief Executive Sudeep Gohil and Creative Chairman David Nobay. A London location was started in 2013”, to “In 2013, Droga5 opened a London office, whose partners now include Chief Executive Officer Bill Scott and Chief Creative Officer David Kolbusz.”
All mentions of Nobby and Gohil were removed by someone with an IP address from inside the Droga5 head office in New York.
However, that was undone the same night by someone based in New Jersey.
On December 18 – around the time the Aussie arm was finally closed down – someone in Sydney decided to go one step further and added a link – a quote from Mumbrella, no less: “On September 8, 2015 Droga5 announced it would be shutting its Sydney office in what David Droga described as a ‘bitter pill to swallow’, in closing his its underperforming Sydney office, just two months after the shock departure of executive creative director Steve Coll.”
That managed to survive for two months before a character called WaverlyW, an active moderator on the page, sprung into action and deleted all mention of Sydney for ever more.
This is the same WaverlyW who was responsible for deleting the mention of the Sydney office on November 5 from the Droga5 agency page.
Interestingly when you go to WaverlyW’s correspondence with the Wikipedia staff it would appear they see something of a “conflict of interest” in the changes they made.
A note from Wiki’s editors read: “I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Droga5, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason. ”
WaverlyW should definitely offer their reputation management skills out to the wider community, Dr Mumbo thinks it could be quite lucrative for them.
im sure a very different story of Sean Cummins
User ID not verified.
This is not news mate. Don’t turn into a gossip mag.
(I guess this won’t get through your editorial filter.)
User ID not verified.
@ not news
Rubbish, this is news. As an industry, we advise clients on how to manage and improve their brands. Presumably, this wouldn’t entail deleting Wikipedia entries they don’t like.
For a high profile agency (the ‘hottest’ no less) to do this, it reeks of hypocrisy. This shows what vanity and ego does to the behavior of some organizations.
User ID not verified.
These details are interesting and important to know how much information is publically accessible.
Also, this may seems like gossip, but explains how with a few managed ‘tweaks’ history can be rewritten and no one would ever know in a few years time.
Just staying on subject regarding suppression of content, the original article here of Droga5 closing mysteriously vanished one day from the old Mumbrella sites front page most commented list even though it topped it out by large margin.
User ID not verified.
Who cares?
Grow up, Dr Mumbo, this is petty stuff.
User ID not verified.
Hi Stuart,
On the old site all the most commented stories went after 28 days from the sidebar. No mystery.
Cheers,
Alex – editor, Mumbrella
This doesnt necessarilly represent decisions made by Droga himself.
Its clear that certain people are just looking out to find the “bean in the rice”.
Who cares?
User ID not verified.
Hi Mathias,
No one is alleging David Droga did this himself. But the fact remains someone within the agency is actively altering a public resource so it no longer reflects the facts accurately.
You may not care, but a lot of people are interested.
Cheers,
Alex – editor, Mumbrella
I for one find this fascinating.
The curation of image and its boundaries of ethical Behaviour is an interesting source of discussion
User ID not verified.
Well I worked there for 7 years, was it just a dream?
User ID not verified.
Personally I found it a dream to work at.
User ID not verified.
The very quick rise and fall of the NZ office isnt there either.
User ID not verified.