<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GQ: We admit it &#8211; the tartan was a mistake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mumbrella.com.au/gq-we-admit-it-the-tartan-was-a-mistake-10286/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/gq-we-admit-it-the-tartan-was-a-mistake-10286</link>
	<description>Everything under Australia’s media, marketing &#38; entertainment umbrella</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:15:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: philip Barker</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/gq-we-admit-it-the-tartan-was-a-mistake-10286#comment-18273</link>
		<dc:creator>philip Barker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=10286#comment-18273</guid>
		<description>Aussie GQ looks the best it ever has on a budget of nothing. Sure, it&#039;s not completely original. It&#039;s part of a prestigious international brand and sometimes GQ UK or US have something the local edition can&#039;t and shouldn&#039;t resist.
There&#039;s a lot of fantastic original writing and photography in the local GQ and, having been close to it for a year or two, I can only applaud the job Nick Smith and his one staff member are doing, working out of a tent near the airport, eating nothing but canapes at vodka launches and drinking free aftershave. Well done, lads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aussie GQ looks the best it ever has on a budget of nothing. Sure, it&#8217;s not completely original. It&#8217;s part of a prestigious international brand and sometimes GQ UK or US have something the local edition can&#8217;t and shouldn&#8217;t resist.<br />
There&#8217;s a lot of fantastic original writing and photography in the local GQ and, having been close to it for a year or two, I can only applaud the job Nick Smith and his one staff member are doing, working out of a tent near the airport, eating nothing but canapes at vodka launches and drinking free aftershave. Well done, lads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deja vu on GQ&#8217;s mea culpa - mUmBRELLA</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/gq-we-admit-it-the-tartan-was-a-mistake-10286#comment-18222</link>
		<dc:creator>Deja vu on GQ&#8217;s mea culpa - mUmBRELLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=10286#comment-18222</guid>
		<description>[...] GQ Australia&#8217;s entertaining mea culpa for its fashion disasters mentioned by Dr Mumbo earlier this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GQ Australia&#8217;s entertaining mea culpa for its fashion disasters mentioned by Dr Mumbo earlier this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balmainiac</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/gq-we-admit-it-the-tartan-was-a-mistake-10286#comment-18200</link>
		<dc:creator>Balmainiac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 05:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=10286#comment-18200</guid>
		<description>Anna Wintour would not be in the slightest horrified because she sure as shit doesn&#039;t lower herself to read derivative, antipodean, mass market rags like Australian GQ. 

Grumber hit it on the head.  How sincere is your apology when you&#039;re just copying the apology that your parent mag wrote 12 months ago.  Also no mention of the fact the 10 year anniversary includes a couple of years when Aus GQ was MIA due to poor sales after it&#039;s initial launch in 99. 

Sidebar:  a one year 6 issue subscription to Aus GQ = $60
a one year 12 issue subscription to US GQ = $58 USD or $63 AUD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anna Wintour would not be in the slightest horrified because she sure as shit doesn&#8217;t lower herself to read derivative, antipodean, mass market rags like Australian GQ. </p>
<p>Grumber hit it on the head.  How sincere is your apology when you&#8217;re just copying the apology that your parent mag wrote 12 months ago.  Also no mention of the fact the 10 year anniversary includes a couple of years when Aus GQ was MIA due to poor sales after it&#8217;s initial launch in 99. </p>
<p>Sidebar:  a one year 6 issue subscription to Aus GQ = $60<br />
a one year 12 issue subscription to US GQ = $58 USD or $63 AUD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumbler</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/gq-we-admit-it-the-tartan-was-a-mistake-10286#comment-18175</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumbler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=10286#comment-18175</guid>
		<description>Um, didn&#039;t US GQ do the exact same thing - almost word for word - a year or so ago? Oh yes, here it is: http://men.style.com/gq/features/landing?id=content_5910</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, didn&#8217;t US GQ do the exact same thing &#8211; almost word for word &#8211; a year or so ago? Oh yes, here it is: <a href="http://men.style.com/gq/features/landing?id=content_5910" rel="nofollow">http://men.style.com/gq/featur.....ntent_5910</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benn Glazier</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/gq-we-admit-it-the-tartan-was-a-mistake-10286#comment-18133</link>
		<dc:creator>Benn Glazier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=10286#comment-18133</guid>
		<description>Did someone say tartan?

It&#039;ll be back in 2011 with a vengeance.

http://bit.ly/4FrpQE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did someone say tartan?</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be back in 2011 with a vengeance.</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/4FrpQE" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4FrpQE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rhodie</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/gq-we-admit-it-the-tartan-was-a-mistake-10286#comment-18071</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rhodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=10286#comment-18071</guid>
		<description>For the record there is absolutely nothing wrong with Tartan. I look rather dashing in my kilt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record there is absolutely nothing wrong with Tartan. I look rather dashing in my kilt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BR.ads.news</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/gq-we-admit-it-the-tartan-was-a-mistake-10286#comment-18069</link>
		<dc:creator>BR.ads.news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=10286#comment-18069</guid>
		<description>Triumph of tartan? Hello Bay City Rollers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Triumph of tartan? Hello Bay City Rollers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: far out brussel sprout</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/gq-we-admit-it-the-tartan-was-a-mistake-10286#comment-18052</link>
		<dc:creator>far out brussel sprout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=10286#comment-18052</guid>
		<description>Nick Smith is on fire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick Smith is on fire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

