-
Opinion
The keyboard warrior of Twitter
In this guest post, NBN staffer Scott Rhodie writes an unofficial, personal view on his experience with a hostile Twitter critic.Last night I had a strange incident. While on Twitter I noticed someone saying that Australia’s NBN is already outdated. I wrote a small note back explaining they were incorrect.
And their response? The lovely gentleman (whose Twitter profile says: ‘Father of 5 kids, Loving Grandfather of 10 Grandchildren,and 2 Great Granddaughters. love to give heaps to Pollies and Poofters’) said to me: “Go and lick Gillards C*** out U commie Prick”
What's in a name?
In this guest post, Moensie Rossier wonders about the power of names for brands and marketers.
Brands have been having a bit of fun with names lately, not to mention a fair bit of success. Interbrand just named a headhunting firm Cloak & Dagger. And ‘Share a Coke’ showed how much power there is in a name.
The Coke campaign effectively short-circuited the usual mechanics of communication. It undoubtedly stroked people’s egos. But, I believe, its success stems from the fact that it directly and automatically affected people’s behaviour, rather than doing so indirectly by shaping attitudes.
Best ads from Super Bowl 2012
The Super Bowl is all done and a team from North America won. But as well as some sort of sporting event, it’s the world’s biggest advertising showcase. See the best of them right here… and please tell us what you think.
How to debunk media myths
In this post, UWS’s Ullrich Ecker, John Cook and Stephen Lewandowsky argue that cognitive science can help PRs form strategies in managing media misreporting.
A growing cohort of commentators has bemoaned the descent of contemporary political “debate” into a largely fact-free zone.
How about simply focusing on what consumers want?
In this guest post, Peter Mountford argues that brands should think more about what is really going on for consumers
Who here is hoping their favourite brand of toilet paper is going to be organizing a flash mob on their way home from work today?
What the Optus web copyright victory means
In this analysis first published on The Conversation, RMIT’s Marita Shelly examines the implications of Telstra’s defeat over the online rights to the AFL broadcast deal
This week’s Federal Court ruling that Optus customers are able to view sporting matches minutes after they are streamed live without breaching copyright is a landmark decision that alters our understanding of copyright law, and has significant implications for the AFL’s broadcasting rights deal.
Does Gina Rinehart’s bite of a chunk of Fairfax make her an oligarch?
In an article that first appeared in The Conversation, Mark Rolfe wonders whether the mining magnate’s move could turn Fairfax into something resembling America’s Fox network.
Australia’s richest person Gina Rinehart has moved to increase her stake in Fairfax Media, owner of The Age, Sydney Morning Herald and a number of radio stations. Rinehart has already shown her desire to play a role in public life, campaigning against former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s aborted mining tax. She has also demonstrated a willingness to make media investments to ensure her pro-business worldview is promulgated.
What does this latest move by Rinehart mean?
Gillard's Australia Day crisis
PM Julia Gillard’s media adviser Tony Hodges has been forced to resign over the Australia Day tent embassy debacle.
It came after it emerged he had revealed opposition leader Tony Abbott’s whereabouts, leading to both politicians being rescued by police in ugly scenes.
Mumbrella editor Tim Burrowes and advertising practitioner Jane Caro debate the topic on Weekend Sunrise’s masters of Spin segment:
The biggest cock-up I made in business
In this guest post, Chris Savage urges agency staff to live the brand.I still shudder when I think about how incredibly stupid I was when I made the biggest stuff up of my career. And then, 18 years later, I did it again. Do not make this mistake with your clients. Ever.
Hey Groupon. Thanks for fucking up email
In this guest post, Daniel Monheit warns that group deal overload is devaluing email marketingEmail marketing used to be fabulous. Back in the heady days of 2010, brands would work hard to build up well qualified databases, upon which they’d bestow carefully crafted correspondence filled with information, offers and incentives. The recipients, of course would be delighted: “Oh look! An email! From one of my favourite brands! And it’s 40 cents off at Woolies this week!”.
The staggering sway of Harold Mitchell
The Power Index today names Aegis Media chairman Harold Mitchell as the most powerful person in Melbourne. Andrew Crook profiles him.
Harold Mitchell takes pride in dispensing with the niceties. When The Power Index visited his South Melbourne private office before Christmas, fresh remains were scattered all over the boardroom table.
Share a Coke with… the moronic masses
The most-read story on Mumbrella last year, with not far off 100,000 page views, was a fairly humdrum yarn about the launch of Coca-Cola’s name-on-a-bottle campaign.The headline, “Coca-Cola puts people’s names on bottles in ‘Share a Coke’ campaign”, though hated by any self-respecting sub-editor, was loved by Google. And in rushed what can be politely described as the public.
Assumptions kill creativity
In this guest post, Gual Barwell disagrees that the sales success of the Old Spice social media campaign was overstated.Yesterday’s post from Cathie McGinn suggested the Old Spice campaign failed to connect with consumers. Based on the facts and figures, I disagree.
What Old Spice and Wieden + Kennedy has done and done phenomenally well is to create a franchise.
The SMH's readers (are wrong) editor
We are now about five months into the reign of Australia’s first readers’ editor. And I don’t think it is working.
It struck me at the time of Judy Prisk’s appointment to the Sydney Morning Herald that the fact that her boss was editor-in-chief Peter Fray was not going to be ideal if she was going to be the independent voice of the reader.
The emperor's new fragrance: Old Spice’s campaign failure
In this guest post, Cathie McGinn slays a sacred cow of 21st century marketing – the highly awarded Old Spice campaign.One of the biggest myths of recent times (by which I mean a story of great heroism and triumph we’d all like to believe but deep down know to be untrue) is the Old Spice social media campaign. It’s been much lauded and awarded as an example of outstanding content, a creative and collaborative way of connecting with consumers and driving a record increase in sales.
Greens ad: Your vote can really move Australia forward
New creative agency Make Believe is to run election advertising for The Greens during the election.
The ad will get its first TV airing on Gruen Nation on ABC1 tonight.
Make Believe was founded last year by Lilian McCombs, Nick Moraitis and Jarra McGrath, who previously helped found campaigning organisation GetUp.
The agency’s clients are charities, non-profit organisations, and other social enterprises.
The election ad – which was mainly created using donated resources – focuses on making individuals feel that their vote is important. It features a series of forwards-backwards images.
The original tagline of the ad – which came before Julia Gillard’s adoption of the phrase was “Your vote can move Australia forwards”.
Supporters are being asked to make donations to pay for TV airtime for the ad.
Dr Mumbo
Latest Comments
- jean cave on Aegis Media launches innovation unit Jumptank, hires Justin Baird from Google
- jean cave on Ten to launch Breakfast on February 27
- Pete on NRMA Insurance puts car stereo in bus shelter
- Groucho on Air NZ casts Aussies who don’t like New Zealand in reality series
- norma on Newspaper ABCs: SMH drops 12%, rival accuses Fairfax of “abandoning” print
- BlueMako on The Straits’ disappointing debut pulls in under 600,000
- Hugh on The keyboard warrior of Twitter
- Ben Beath on Air NZ casts Aussies who don’t like New Zealand in reality series
Latest Jobs- Digital Online Copy Writter and content producer - North Shore
- Digital Creative Director - Sydney
- Senior Account Executive - Pyrmont
- Social Media Manager - Leading Creative/Digital Agency - Sydney
- Digital Project Manager - Melbourne
- FREELANCE Senior digital producer - 3/4 weeks - Sydney
- Digital Project Manager - Melbourne
- Marketing Manager – Optus - North Ryde, Sydney
- Film Services Coordinator - South Yarra VIC
- Marketing Specialist - Sydney
F.Y.I.
- Adstream announces digital portfolio and asset management system
- M&C Saatchi acquires Bang PR
- Nissan to enter V8 Supercar Championships
- Fantastic Furniture goes mobile
- The Playroom launches transmedia division, makes hires
- Media Monitors Group rebrands as Sentia Media
- Circus announces second round of speakers
- Prada to launch new phone in Australia in April
Most Discussed
- Marketers told: Watch the briefs 22-year-olds at your media agencies are sending on your behalf
With 85 comments - Hey Groupon. Thanks for fucking up email
With 75 comments - Jenny Craig cancels Kyle & Jackie O sponsorship: 'We badly misjudged public perception of Sandilands'
With 68 comments - Boating industry calls agency pitch for pro-bono work
With 65 comments - Jeep erects a car on a pole
With 47 comments - Australian Ethical: we don't invest in guns, tobacco or pollution
With 46 comments - The biggest cock-up I made in business
With 45 comments - The emperor's new fragrance: Old Spice’s campaign failure
With 42 comments
- Marketers told: Watch the briefs 22-year-olds at your media agencies are sending on your behalf



Comments
28 Jul 10
3:17 pm
Not at all convinced by this ad. The running things backwards trick is a TV advertising cliche, and in this context it’s just confusing. Why is the bloke walking foward while everyone else goes backwards? Is he going backwards at the start — watching the ad closely once I can’t even remember? Is that footage with the family going backwards? Why are they going backwards if we’re getting six months paid parental leave? Are those kids leaving an immigration detention centre? This is an absolutely confusing mess — alienating, too clever be half and unclear. It doesn’t make me feel anything apart from irritated.
29 Jul 10
12:00 am
I agree with Misha, this ad is irritating. It really is awful. And it says nothing about what they do/stand for, other than a quick flash of a newspaper headline. Is that the only issue we’re supposed to care about?
29 Jul 10
8:40 am
Gruen Nation was bloody excellent last night. More like that please.
29 Jul 10
8:41 am
And on topic: that Greens ad sucks.
29 Jul 10
10:02 am
Maybe they’ve been watching too much Doctor Who? Looks like a promo for one of the episodes.
Greens should focus on the positive ways to make a change. Too much negative in the ad and as Misha said, it’s confusing.
29 Jul 10
10:42 am
Awful
29 Jul 10
1:02 pm
And Gruen called this ad for what it is: a great piece of film, but totally useless execution that doesn’t work.
It relies excessively on intellect, and assumes that viewers will be able to pick up on complex visual queues to get its core message.
And if that’s not bad enough, it has no audio thus requiring the viewer to sit through the whole ad to know what its about, what its trying to say, and who its for.
Throw this into the worst ad list, and find a suitable punishment for the creatives and team at Make Believe (suggest being tied to a tree naked for a few weeks in a cold Tasmanian forest might be a good idea).
29 Jul 10
11:39 pm
noooooo they used the move Australia forward slogan. I think seeing that is enough to turn off voters, we have to listen gillard say it everytime she opens her mouth don’t tell me the greens have adopted it to.
2 Aug 10
5:31 pm
Did they make the new ones, cause they seemed to have learned their lesson. The new ads have a clear focus and the seem to have put the message before the techniques.
13 Aug 10
12:34 pm
On Wednesday night, The Gruen Nation featured a ‘pitch’ to create an ad for the Greens. The pitch was created by Republic of Everyone, and the ‘ad’ is available on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4jI1atQwp4).
Apparently the ABC has denied the Greens use of the ad (http://www.abc.net.au/news/sto.....981137.htm), yet it’s received close to 30,000 views on YouTube.
Simple, creative, powerful stuff, regardless of your politics.