Has Woolies found its voice?
In this guest post Matt Robinson argues the success and reach of Woolworths’ social interaction yesterday proves more big brands need to align their social and marketing tones.
The story of the gradual erosion of Australia’s biggest supermarket chain is not a new one. From the once mighty Fresh Food People, to now seeing rapidly declining favourability scores and tales that show some cultural challenges as well, Woolworths are having a tough time of it.
While communications can’t solve every problem, having a distinctive and differentiated brand and embedding it deep into your organisation has been proven to drive significant value.
One of the core tools in the brand shed, is the idea of brand voice. Creating a distinctive and differentiated voice has helped brands from Old Spice to Aldi cut through the clutter.
Something that has been on my mind for a long time now is how this idea of brand voice plays out in interactive channels like social.
On the one hand you’ve got brands such as Telstra and Qantas. For the most part, you can see their brand voice reflected in their interactions with people… professional, courteous, a dash of warmth where required. Their voice is consistent across the board, but they’re able to adapt their tone to the context of the conversation.
Then you’ve got more youth focused brands. Skittles, Lynx, Sportsgirl. They do a great job of mirroring the language of their audience and creating the entertainment value that they crave.
Where it gets interesting, is when you’ve got brands with a clear, safe corporate image – whose social media team are in tune with the communities they serve, but are slightly removed from their core brand voice.
A case in point came on Tuesday when a Woolworths customer posted this:
To which the Woolworths social team responded (brilliantly) with this:
By 3pm on Tuesday it had received 62,000+ likes and 12,000 shares. When I last checked it has now shot up to more than 124,500 likes and 37,000 shares. Back-of-a-napkin maths says that the reach of this little dialogue (on Facebook alone) would be upwards of two million people, or the equivalent of a full page in a couple of the Sunday papers, or a particularly strong episode of Masterchef.
This raises a couple of important questions.
First, when does a brand’s social voice, become its brand voice (whether it likes it or not)? As the often quoted Marty Neumeier says: “A brand isn’t what you say it is, it’s what they say it is.”
Clearly riffing off pop culture for Woolies has created a huge level of engagement, possibly more than the regular Woolworths comms. And there is absolutely no doubt, that this rapping, witty, highly responsive conversation is far more distinctive and interesting from them, than a green bird cheap cheaping.
Second, for these brands who have made a habit of referencing pop culture and tried jumping into a world of memes, LOLs and social media burns… is this creating differentiation (and true brand value) for them, or is the ‘engagement’ far more disposable?
So, should Woolworths take a hint from the success of this post, and build a more modern voice across its comms, as informed by real data? Or should they be bringing their social voice in line with their brand, and sacrifice engagement for consistency?
Either way, I think brands are missing a trick by not better aligning their voice all the way from advertising to social.
I’d hazard a guess that at at some point soon, the definition of a brand’s voice will be shaped by the hundreds of thousands of real interactions it’s having with people – and not just what’s sitting in the strategy document.
- Matt Robinson is managing director and partner at AnalogFolk Sydney
While doing awesome things like this gets awesome reach and plenty of applause amongst millenials and marketers, does this type of ‘brand voice’ actually resonate with he bulk of people who spend $$$ on groceries?
User ID not verified.
Agree but disagree. I think the challenge for the big grocery retailers is differentiation and dare I say, purpose. A more authentic / human / intimate / fun / relevant brand voice would be the expression of a differentiated brand not the basis of it. Vanity metrics are great and social interactions can change attitudes but if the values and behaviours of the organisation are misaligned with the external representation of the brand then it’s meaningless.
User ID not verified.
It’s lovely for Woolies to have something in the news that isn’t about the dire state of their business, but it isn’t going to be shifting any needles that matter in terms of brand or sales.
User ID not verified.
Coles has been doing this for years. As has 7 Eleven… as have a bunch of large brands. i
User ID not verified.
It certainly distracted from the 100+ posts to their wall in the following 24 hours about rotten food and terrible service. I’d like to think a more discerning consumer could see it for what it is: a giant corporation that consistently screws over the little guy getting “hip” and “totally down” with the kids for some free kudos. Of course, there aren’t many discerning consumers … sooooo … Go Woolworths?
User ID not verified.
Oh Matt, I’m pushing a little vom back down my throat. Ever since Woolies stopped stocking about 20% of the items/varieties we usually shop, we switched to Coles. Brand voice. Yep, plunder the mktg budget, charge them $500k to find it. Dinner only comes once a day. FFS. Likes. How many people who jumped on the Ben Quilty/Myo social love fest have donated a dollar or given an hour to change the death penalty. Tapping your iPhone is easy. getting off your arse, well you might miss the latest post……
User ID not verified.
Fresh Food People wasn’t an advertising or promotions idea – it was strategic. Woollies decided to get into fruit and vegies because the mark up was rediculous and the profits big. And the shoppers didn’t have to drop into the fruit and vegie shop on their way out of Woolworths.
So wouldn’t you think this is the perfect time to find another big strategic idea instead of pissing around expecting brand image changes and likes to achieve anything?
User ID not verified.
Seems to me the question is one of basic quality differences, if you take the overall quaity of Woolies own branded products, compare them with Coles, there is no contest Coles wins every time. I’m not sure if this is down to employing more savvy source finders, or what – but no amount of marketing wizardry is going to fix a fundamental flaw in the foundations. I have always been alarmed at the market dominance of two grocery chains, it really isn’t healthy – IGA are growing in popularity but we need more variation to service the markets-Coles occupying a monopoly is rather like brand ‘Australia’, it is not really one homogeneous identity but they pitch it like it is.
User ID not verified.