News

Policy group proposes junk food ad ban to tackle childhood obesity

A policy group backed by the World Health Organisation and Diabetes Australia has called for restrictions to be placed on unhealthy foods advertising, which it claims is a cause of childhood obesity.

The group, called the Obesity Policy Coalition, also slammed self-regulation for being “utterly ineffective” in protecting children from junk food advertising.

An ‘evidence-based blueprint’ has been sent to state and federal governments, pushing for new rules to be imposed on TV ads during peak children’s viewing times and the introduction of key marketing definitions, such as ‘unhealthy food’ and advertising ‘directed to children’.

The new rules would, if approved, see junk food advertising banned on TV on weekdays between 6-9am and 4-9pm and weekends and school holidays from 6am-12pm and 4-9pm.

The blueprint is backed with research from OPC that found that 84% of consumers believe children “should be protected from unhealthy food advertising.” It also found that nine in 10 were in favour of the government introducing stronger restrictions to reduce the amount of unhealthy food and drink advertising seen by children.

Jane Martin, senior policy advisor for OPC, said that the self regulation system now in place “allows junk food companies to advertise during the highest rating children’s TV programs. It also permits them to use websites and Facebook, freetoys, competitions and sports sponsorship as marketing tools to reach kids, as well as obtaining children’s contact details and marketing directly to them via email, SMS or mail.”

She added that Australian consumers have had enough of junk food companies marketing unhealthy food to children. “New Cancer Council research released today found nearly 60% of grocery buyers nominated TV advertising or toy giveaways as having the biggest impact on their children asking for an unhealthy food product.”

Boyd Swinburn, director of the World Health Organisation’s collaborating centre for obesity prevention of Deakin University, said that it had been a year since self regulation codes on reducing junk foods ads had been introduced, but they had not worked. “The codes were too narrow in their definition of what is junk food and what is a child,” he said.

The group used codes drawn up in the UK to help it come up with new definitions for Australian marketers. In the UK, restrictions on sugary and salty foods advertising have led to a 30% reduction in the exposure of children to junk food advertising, noted Swinburn, although he admitted that a direct link between junk food ads and obesity has yet to be made.

Daniel Leesong, CEO of the Communications Council, complained that the OPC had drawn up legislation proposals without consultation with the industry. “Sweeping regulation suggestions of this kind shouldn’t be made without first engaging with us. From our perspective, we wouldn’t support restrictions like these without more thorough consultation and without evidence that restrictions actually work.”

Leesong pointed to cases of where junk food ad bans have been ineffective in reducing obesity, such as Sweden and Quebec. He added: “Obesity is an issue that the advertisers and agencies take very seriously,” he said. “Menu adaptations made by fast food companies as well as tweaks to marketing practices reflect that.”

Speaking on behalf of advertisers, Joe Talcott, marketing director of News Limited, head of the Australia Association of National Advertisers and a former McDonald’s marketer, said that self regulation does work, and is a quicker, more efficient way for the industry to tackle key issues such as health. “The system in place gives the public the chance to complain about things it feels aren’t right. And the evidence is that they’re pretty happy with the way things are.”

In a 44-page advertising legislation blueprint, the OPC authors claim that children do not have the cognitive capacity to understand and resist the influence of advertising, and that their proposal offered an “effective, fair and proportionate strategy” for reducing childrens’ exposure to junk food ads.

The report, which took over a year to produce, has been published in the wake of controversial fast food marketing promotions to adults such as KFC’s The Double, a bunless chicken burger, and Mad Mex’s launch of a burrito weighing 1kg.

On such promotions, Swinburn said that they are orchestrated “by smart people who wouldn’t spend this amount of money if they didn’t get a return on their investment. It doesn’t take much to join the dots.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Get the latest media and marketing industry news (and views) direct to your inbox.

Sign up to the free Mumbrella newsletter now.

 

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up to our free daily update to get the latest in media and marketing.