<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magazine ABCs &amp; readership: Famous, GQ and The Monthly are up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mumbrella.com.au/magazine-abcs-readership-famous-gq-and-the-monthly-are-up-8577/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/magazine-abcs-readership-famous-gq-and-the-monthly-are-up-8577</link>
	<description>Everything under Australia’s media, marketing &#38; entertainment umbrella</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:15:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: In A Russh &#171; chic freak</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/magazine-abcs-readership-famous-gq-and-the-monthly-are-up-8577#comment-14571</link>
		<dc:creator>In A Russh &#171; chic freak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 06:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=8577#comment-14571</guid>
		<description>[...] 6, 2009 &#183; Leave a Comment  Reading the recently released magazine circulation figures for the second quarter of 2009, I was interested to see that niche fashion mag Russh posted the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6, 2009 &middot; Leave a Comment  Reading the recently released magazine circulation figures for the second quarter of 2009, I was interested to see that niche fashion mag Russh posted the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahida Tabu</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/magazine-abcs-readership-famous-gq-and-the-monthly-are-up-8577#comment-12873</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahida Tabu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=8577#comment-12873</guid>
		<description> Things not so Sunny at &quot;The Week&quot;?

Almost a year since its auspicious $5 million dollar launch and &quot;The Week&quot; still haven&#039;t managed to find their way onto Roy Morgan Readership or a circulation audit through the ABC. The murmers are growing that this title has so far failed to find its audience - which is easy to understand as I don&#039;t know a lot of people who will spend $4.95 so they can read last week&#039;s news.

Fancifully claiming to be  &quot;Australia&#039;s fastest growing news magazine&quot; the numbers sure do speak for themselves at theweek.com.au
 
Projected circulation of 25,000 - June 09 - Obviously forgot to put in an application in time! Readership of 93,000 - Fusion research study - Feb 09 - Roy Morgan? Who?
 
With the need for transparency more important than ever I guess I should finish off with a simple &quot;please explain&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Things not so Sunny at &#8220;The Week&#8221;?</p>
<p>Almost a year since its auspicious $5 million dollar launch and &#8220;The Week&#8221; still haven&#8217;t managed to find their way onto Roy Morgan Readership or a circulation audit through the ABC. The murmers are growing that this title has so far failed to find its audience &#8211; which is easy to understand as I don&#8217;t know a lot of people who will spend $4.95 so they can read last week&#8217;s news.</p>
<p>Fancifully claiming to be  &#8221;Australia&#8217;s fastest growing news magazine&#8221; the numbers sure do speak for themselves at theweek.com.au<br />
 <br />
Projected circulation of 25,000 &#8211; June 09 &#8211; Obviously forgot to put in an application in time! Readership of 93,000 &#8211; Fusion research study &#8211; Feb 09 &#8211; Roy Morgan? Who?<br />
 <br />
With the need for transparency more important than ever I guess I should finish off with a simple &#8220;please explain&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quentin Long</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/magazine-abcs-readership-famous-gq-and-the-monthly-are-up-8577#comment-12864</link>
		<dc:creator>Quentin Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=8577#comment-12864</guid>
		<description>Tim 
What about the rest of the titles that were up?

Do you have a bias for The Monthy, Famous and GQ?

I know bit of self interest . . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim<br />
What about the rest of the titles that were up?</p>
<p>Do you have a bias for The Monthy, Famous and GQ?</p>
<p>I know bit of self interest . . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

