-
Opinion
The keyboard warrior of Twitter
In this guest post, NBN staffer Scott Rhodie writes an unofficial, personal view on his experience with a hostile Twitter critic.Last night I had a strange incident. While on Twitter I noticed someone saying that Australia’s NBN is already outdated. I wrote a small note back explaining they were incorrect.
And their response? The lovely gentleman (whose Twitter profile says: ‘Father of 5 kids, Loving Grandfather of 10 Grandchildren,and 2 Great Granddaughters. love to give heaps to Pollies and Poofters’) said to me: “Go and lick Gillards C*** out U commie Prick”
What's in a name?
In this guest post, Moensie Rossier wonders about the power of names for brands and marketers.
Brands have been having a bit of fun with names lately, not to mention a fair bit of success. Interbrand just named a headhunting firm Cloak & Dagger. And ‘Share a Coke’ showed how much power there is in a name.
The Coke campaign effectively short-circuited the usual mechanics of communication. It undoubtedly stroked people’s egos. But, I believe, its success stems from the fact that it directly and automatically affected people’s behaviour, rather than doing so indirectly by shaping attitudes.
Best ads from Super Bowl 2012
The Super Bowl is all done and a team from North America won. But as well as some sort of sporting event, it’s the world’s biggest advertising showcase. See the best of them right here… and please tell us what you think.
How to debunk media myths
In this post, UWS’s Ullrich Ecker, John Cook and Stephen Lewandowsky argue that cognitive science can help PRs form strategies in managing media misreporting.
A growing cohort of commentators has bemoaned the descent of contemporary political “debate” into a largely fact-free zone.
How about simply focusing on what consumers want?
In this guest post, Peter Mountford argues that brands should think more about what is really going on for consumers
Who here is hoping their favourite brand of toilet paper is going to be organizing a flash mob on their way home from work today?
What the Optus web copyright victory means
In this analysis first published on The Conversation, RMIT’s Marita Shelly examines the implications of Telstra’s defeat over the online rights to the AFL broadcast deal
This week’s Federal Court ruling that Optus customers are able to view sporting matches minutes after they are streamed live without breaching copyright is a landmark decision that alters our understanding of copyright law, and has significant implications for the AFL’s broadcasting rights deal.
Does Gina Rinehart’s bite of a chunk of Fairfax make her an oligarch?
In an article that first appeared in The Conversation, Mark Rolfe wonders whether the mining magnate’s move could turn Fairfax into something resembling America’s Fox network.
Australia’s richest person Gina Rinehart has moved to increase her stake in Fairfax Media, owner of The Age, Sydney Morning Herald and a number of radio stations. Rinehart has already shown her desire to play a role in public life, campaigning against former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s aborted mining tax. She has also demonstrated a willingness to make media investments to ensure her pro-business worldview is promulgated.
What does this latest move by Rinehart mean?
Gillard's Australia Day crisis
PM Julia Gillard’s media adviser Tony Hodges has been forced to resign over the Australia Day tent embassy debacle.
It came after it emerged he had revealed opposition leader Tony Abbott’s whereabouts, leading to both politicians being rescued by police in ugly scenes.
Mumbrella editor Tim Burrowes and advertising practitioner Jane Caro debate the topic on Weekend Sunrise’s masters of Spin segment:
The biggest cock-up I made in business
In this guest post, Chris Savage urges agency staff to live the brand.I still shudder when I think about how incredibly stupid I was when I made the biggest stuff up of my career. And then, 18 years later, I did it again. Do not make this mistake with your clients. Ever.
Hey Groupon. Thanks for fucking up email
In this guest post, Daniel Monheit warns that group deal overload is devaluing email marketingEmail marketing used to be fabulous. Back in the heady days of 2010, brands would work hard to build up well qualified databases, upon which they’d bestow carefully crafted correspondence filled with information, offers and incentives. The recipients, of course would be delighted: “Oh look! An email! From one of my favourite brands! And it’s 40 cents off at Woolies this week!”.
The staggering sway of Harold Mitchell
The Power Index today names Aegis Media chairman Harold Mitchell as the most powerful person in Melbourne. Andrew Crook profiles him.
Harold Mitchell takes pride in dispensing with the niceties. When The Power Index visited his South Melbourne private office before Christmas, fresh remains were scattered all over the boardroom table.
Share a Coke with… the moronic masses
The most-read story on Mumbrella last year, with not far off 100,000 page views, was a fairly humdrum yarn about the launch of Coca-Cola’s name-on-a-bottle campaign.The headline, “Coca-Cola puts people’s names on bottles in ‘Share a Coke’ campaign”, though hated by any self-respecting sub-editor, was loved by Google. And in rushed what can be politely described as the public.
Assumptions kill creativity
In this guest post, Gual Barwell disagrees that the sales success of the Old Spice social media campaign was overstated.Yesterday’s post from Cathie McGinn suggested the Old Spice campaign failed to connect with consumers. Based on the facts and figures, I disagree.
What Old Spice and Wieden + Kennedy has done and done phenomenally well is to create a franchise.
The SMH's readers (are wrong) editor
We are now about five months into the reign of Australia’s first readers’ editor. And I don’t think it is working.
It struck me at the time of Judy Prisk’s appointment to the Sydney Morning Herald that the fact that her boss was editor-in-chief Peter Fray was not going to be ideal if she was going to be the independent voice of the reader.
The emperor's new fragrance: Old Spice’s campaign failure
In this guest post, Cathie McGinn slays a sacred cow of 21st century marketing – the highly awarded Old Spice campaign.One of the biggest myths of recent times (by which I mean a story of great heroism and triumph we’d all like to believe but deep down know to be untrue) is the Old Spice social media campaign. It’s been much lauded and awarded as an example of outstanding content, a creative and collaborative way of connecting with consumers and driving a record increase in sales.
Mags get on board with readership shake-up
Australia’s major magazine publishers have taken cautious steps towards joing the newspaper industry’s attempts to break Roy Morgan research’s hold on readership data.
In a statement, the MPA said:
“The members of Magazine Publishers of Australia have voted to participate in the readership review and tender development process recently initiated by The Newspaper Works.
“The magazine publishers will be involved in the various stages of print audience measurement review and call for submissions, in support of an enhanced set of readership metrics to serve the evolving needs of the industry.
“MPA chairman, Nick Chan, said, “Notwithstanding our support for the Morgan survey and belief that it serves the industry well, it also makes sense for magazines to be at the table when a process such as this is taking place. We look forward to seeing a positive outcome for the industry as a result of this enterprise.”
Dr Mumbo
Latest Comments
- Craig on The keyboard warrior of Twitter
- Craig on ABCs: FHM loses 50% of circulation in one of biggest magazine sales drops in media history
- DBPurkis on Durex uses giant cock to target gay community
- Logic on ABCs: FHM loses 50% of circulation in one of biggest magazine sales drops in media history
- It-must-be-true-it's-on-the-internet on ABCs: FHM loses 50% of circulation in one of biggest magazine sales drops in media history
- Col on Air NZ casts Aussies who don’t like New Zealand in reality series
- Ann on Newspaper ABCs: SMH drops 12%, rival accuses Fairfax of “abandoning” print
- Ann on Fairfax first to move on releasing detailed data on app usage – slow start for The Age and The SMH
Latest Jobs- Digital Online Copy Writter and content producer - North Shore
- Digital Creative Director - Sydney
- Senior Account Executive - Pyrmont
- Social Media Manager - Leading Creative/Digital Agency - Sydney
- Digital Project Manager - Melbourne
- FREELANCE Senior digital producer - 3/4 weeks - Sydney
- Digital Project Manager - Melbourne
- Marketing Manager – Optus - North Ryde, Sydney
- Film Services Coordinator - South Yarra VIC
- Marketing Specialist - Sydney
F.Y.I.
- Adstream announces digital portfolio and asset management system
- M&C Saatchi acquires Bang PR
- Nissan to enter V8 Supercar Championships
- Fantastic Furniture goes mobile
- The Playroom launches transmedia division, makes hires
- Media Monitors Group rebrands as Sentia Media
- Circus announces second round of speakers
- Prada to launch new phone in Australia in April
Most Discussed
- Marketers told: Watch the briefs 22-year-olds at your media agencies are sending on your behalf
With 85 comments - Hey Groupon. Thanks for fucking up email
With 75 comments - Jenny Craig cancels Kyle & Jackie O sponsorship: 'We badly misjudged public perception of Sandilands'
With 68 comments - Boating industry calls agency pitch for pro-bono work
With 65 comments - Australian Ethical: we don't invest in guns, tobacco or pollution
With 46 comments - The biggest cock-up I made in business
With 45 comments - The emperor's new fragrance: Old Spice’s campaign failure
With 42 comments - GetUp! launches attack ad on Tony Abbott boat people policy
With 41 comments
- Marketers told: Watch the briefs 22-year-olds at your media agencies are sending on your behalf



Comments
21 Aug 09
11:30 am
Finally – it should be about circ and demographic, not where your masthead sits in the book when the Morgan researcher comes a-knocking …
21 Aug 09
12:47 pm
Agree with philip Barker.
Circulation figures are real, readership figures are extremely dubious.
As a person who has been studying the circulation and readership figures for years, I have noted that circulation figures are sometimes higher then Morgan readership figures.
21 Aug 09
2:04 pm
The problem with circulation is that it doesn’t bear any relationship to eyeballs, which is ultimately what advertisers want.
Should the paper sitting in my office count as 1 when there are a dozen people who read it every day? What about the copies that go un-read, especially local rags that go straight into the recycling bin?
Not saying the Morgan data is perfect, but readership as a concept is a far better measure.
21 Aug 09
2:27 pm
I would say that rather than circulation or readership, advertisers want to know in which titles their ads will sell the most stuff.
Hopefully this is the start of a concerted journey to help uncover the commercial effectiveness of print media. All media need to know more about what they return to advertisers. For those that can invest and understand this more will come greater returns than those that settle for the status quo of the less than satisfactory current position.
21 Aug 09
2:28 pm
I’m dubious about the integrity of Morgan’s figures for another reason – if a big publisher like ACP, who spends millions to have their publications on Roy Morgan’s list, brings out a new magazine, do we really think Roy Morgan is going to jeopardise those fees by giving it a poor rating? And yet many of the smaller independant mags can’t get on the list, because they can’t afford the fee.
I welcome a competitor, and hope their methodology is more transparent.
21 Aug 09
2:56 pm
Chris, while I agree with what you are saying, I fear you are way ahead of most of the stakeholders involved in this process.
21 Aug 09
3:03 pm
Yup, you are probably right Anonymous. At the same time, hopefully there is no issue with standing up ahead and waving to give an idea of where they should be heading.
24 Aug 09
2:32 pm
circulation, readers per copy, cost per ’000, et al are the traditional measurement tools utilised by both advertising buyers & sellers of Newspaper & Magazine advertising. whilst there is an arguement for change, which research methodology is superior?
at least the existing methodology (RMorgan Research) delivers comparable data, period x period, that accurately define TRENDS recorded over a considerable number of years – even if there is some discussion related to individual reporting events of circulation, readership, etc.
if change to the research method is instituted, there will be a considerable delay before TRENDS can be recognised! what lost opportunities will the industry bear ?
24 Aug 09
11:51 pm
Some interesting and some rather bizarre comments here. Circulation and readership both have there place as measures of performance. They both measure different things. In general I think most people are comfortable with the readership method employed to measure print media. The position of the masthead in the book and ACP’s wallet will have little adverse effect on the figures, the estimates are relatively reliable and valid.
I think the issues here are around how well Roy Morgan measures “total audience”, by that I mean cross platform reach. This is the reason newspapers are driving change. They are embracing multiple delivery platforms for their content while the current method is only reliable at measuring the print platform. Magazines are less concerned as they have fewer multi-platform offerings and generate the vast majority of their audience through their print products.
I believe Newspapers want to see a measure of performance of a single brand across print, online and mobile platforms to deliver a portfolio reach which can also be broken down into the three constituent elements and sold against.
There is no disputing the need for advertising effectiveness and ROI studies but these are complex enough to administer for above the line advertising and media alone without being added to the audience measurement study.