Mission: to upset, outrage and appal: 25 years of the TAC – and their 25 most powerful ads
Victoria’s Transport Accident Commission has just celebrated its 25th birthday. Robin Hicks looks back at the most powerful ads in its history, and wonders what makes effective road safety advertising.
When the TAC was created in 1987, it declared a mission to ‘upset, outrage and appal’ Victorians to reduce the number of road deaths in the state.
For an ad agency, that is quite a brief.
The TAC began advertising in December 1989, appointing Grey Melbourne, an agency that it has worked with ever since. Twenty-three years later, the state boasts the safest roads in Australia.
When the campaign started, the road death toll in Victoria was 776 in a year. Last year, the total was down to 287.
Of course, the TAC’s progress in reducing road casualties is not just about effective advertising. Safer cars, better roads, government legislation, heavier police enforcement and heftier fines have helped. But these factors are at play in other states too – and road accidents are still more common beyond Victoria’s borders.
“Given that Australians live in a fairly homogenous society, the only major difference between the states has been the TAC campaign,” says Randal Glennon, GM of Grey Melbourne, who has run the business for the last decade.
The TAC’s ads – of which there have been about 160 TV spots since the campaign began (and hundreds more on billboards, radio and in press) – have stuck in the consciousness of the Victorian motorist over the years like haunting memories.
The most memorable is probably ‘Night shift’, the first ad to tackle driver tiredness in 1994, which saw a kombi van smash into a truck (see our list of the top 25 most powerful TAC ads below; warning, some are NSFW). But there have been many others, with slogans such as ‘If you drink, then drive, you’re a bloody idiot’ having entered the Victorian vernacular.
Often controversial – not only because of their graphic nature – the TAC provoked the wrath of motorcyclists with a campaign in April this year, with bikers arguing in the comment thread on Mumbrella that the ad unfairly portrayed bikers as more dangerous than car drivers. The campaign led to a barrage of complaints to the advertising watchdog.
A worry for the TAC could be that the effectiveness of its advertising is waning – although the brand says this is not the case. When the TAC’s first ad aired on TV, it had an immediate impact. It sparked a huge debate in the media, and, along with increased enforcement and the introduction of booze buses, led to the road toll plunging by 50% over the next three years.
But back then, the campaign was new and shocking. Twenty-five years on, Victorians know what to expect from the TAC’s approach.
Advertising strategy: not shock – reality
The TAC’s senior manager of road safety and marketing John Thompson is at pains not to use the word shock.
“We do not use shock tactics. It’s about reality – without being gratuitous,” he says. “Most people have never seen a serious road accident. The closest they come is sitting in a traffic jam after an accident has happened. We need to bring the reality of road trauma into the living room.”
Nigel Dawson, creative director at Grey Melbourne, a 16-year veteran on the account, says: “Sometimes you don’t need to hit people over the head with a cricket bad. But the more ‘ad-like’ the idea, the more you distance yourself from reality.”
The TAC counts on three different strategies to tackle the tired creative idea of people dying in horrible ways on Victoria’s roads: emotion, enforcement and education.
Glennon explains: “Hard-hitting ads showing the emotional outcomes of driving over the speed limit will pick off the low-hanging fruit. They are easy to convince – but are not the ones most at risk. Emotive advertising also provides a sobering backdrop to communicating to tougher audiences.
“Then there are those who simply do not believe that slowing down a bit will have any effect. Education in the form of simple science convinced many of them. But the harder nuts will speed on regardless. The only thing that slows them down is the possibility of being caught and fined. Hence the enforcement advertising, always backed by police activity.”
Creatively, the TAC abides by four principles:
- Do ensure that every ad leaves us thinking ‘That could so easily be me’
- Do be as shocking as you like
- Do be as emotional as possible
- Do emphasise the link between drink/drive, speed, etc – and real crashes
TAC started out with a focus on drink driving and speeding. The focus has broadened in line with the dangers on Victoria’s roads. Now drug driving and distractions such as using a mobile phone, particularly texting, have made life more difficult for Dawson and his creative team.
Production: no cutting corners
TAC ads are very expensive to make. A shoot will invariably run over three days or more, often with a cast of hundreds. Major roads need to be closed. Police time is used, since real police officers always feature in ads. There can be no short cuts.
“We have serious cost issues. We can’t cheat. We have to be realistic. And as a statutory body, we have to take health and safety extremely seriously,” says Thompson.
Over the years, the TAC has used Australia’s top directors, who have been known to drop other projects to work on TAC projects. John Lyon, Garth Davis, Bruce Hunt, Rey Carlson, David Denneen, Colin Skyba, Jeffrey Darling. “The directors we’ve used are a who’s who of Australian advertising. We need grown ups who get it,” says Thompson.
Media strategy: is less more?
The TAC’s media budget has grown from $10m in the 1990s to $22.5m this year. “Our budget has increased steadily. But of course, so have media costs,” says Thompson.
Not that the nature of TAC’s commercials require much repetition. “People see our ad, they hate it, and they don’t want to see it again,” says Glennon.
Not all of the budget goes on TV. Roughly 30% of TAC’s media spend goes on outdoor, which has drawn criticism in the past for distracting motorists with screaming billboards.
“My point of sale – or rather point of speeding – medium is the roadside sign,” says Thompson. “This is not the sort of media strategy you can rely on a 23 year-old media planner to handle. We need coverage across the whole of Victoria – a state the size of the UK. The campaign has to talk to Victorians everywhere, all year round, and we need grown up media thinkers.”
The TAC also invests heavily in sponsoring the AFL (through the TAC Cup), and also in digital. Three years ago, it took its campaign into the world of video games to get its message to younger drivers. The TAC struck a deal that saw its ads run on billboards in the background of XBOX 360 and PS3 games.
Australia’s longest client-agency relationship?
Not quite. “There have been longer such as GPY&R and Arnott’s and Kraft and JWT,” says Darren Woolley, MD of pitch doctor TrinityP3, who worked at Grey from 1990 to 1995 as a copywriter. “But there are none with the consistent profile, awards or effectiveness recognition.”
Grey Melbourne has won many awards for its TAC work, at Cannes, One Show and D&AD. Among the most high profile in recent times was The Ripple Effect, which told the story of Luke Robinson’s death from 26 different people’s perspectives, including his family.
But by its own admission, Grey has been a victim of its own success with TAC, and the agency has been pigeonholed by the industry as having little else to show but its TAC work, despite having other accounts such as Leggo’s.
TAC has not worked exclusively with Grey. Over the years, it has also worked with the now defunct shops The Moult Agency and Pure D’Arcy, and also with Clemenger BBDO Melbourne, GPY&R Melbourne and Naked Communications, which created the highly acclaimed Speed Town campaign. The tiny provincial town of Speed was renamed Speed Kills, which marked the TAC’s first foray on Facebook in 2011.
The TAC team
The TAC ad account stands out for the continuity – critics would say lack of diversity – of the people working on it.
Nigel Dawson, Grey Melbourne’s creative director and chairman of the Melbourne Advertising and Design Club, is only the second creative director to lead the account, which was kicked off by Greg Harper and Stewart Byfield, who created the logo.
John Thompson, the fourth marketing director, has run the account for eight years – after Ann Randal, Prue Lovell and Ben Holgate.
There have been just two business directors, Debbie Kendall and latterly Randal Glennon.
The agency keeps things fresh with a continual stream of young creatives. Also important to note is that the TAC has worked with Sweeney Research from the very beginning. The firm conducts studies on the impact of TAC’s ads.
The TAC Model
Before the TAC was founded, Victorians involved in road accidents had to go through the courts to prove fault. This was costly and often unjust, says Thompson. The TAC concept was to act as a third party insurance provider, funded by a portion of a car registration fee, to give automatic cover to all Victorians. Critically, as a statutory body, the TAC is unaffected by changes of government.
“The TAC is a government authority, but essentially it’s an insurance company that covers anyone regardless of blame. For life,” says Thompson. “It’s in the TAC’s interest to keep costs as low as possible. So they do everything possible to keep deaths down.”
Road trauma costs Victoria $4.5bn dollars a year – a conservative estimate, says Thompson. $1bn a year is spent on TAC’s clients.
The commission is staffed by 840 people, with only 15 people – including the marketing team – working in prevention. The rest work servicing the TAC’s clients.
The model has been exported to New Zealand, and is also used in Canada.
The TAC brand
Thompson might be exaggerating when he says that the TAC brand is “more powerful in Victoria that Coles, Nike or Coca-Cola.” But awareness of TAC is high and its logo – unchanged since the beginning – is a familiar sight on roadsides and in living rooms across the state.
The brand’s YouTube channel has more than 5,200 subscribers and has had more than 20m views. Earlier this month, the TAC uploaded a 13-minute video to mark its 25th birthday.
Copied the world over
Last month, four TAC commercials were used by the Chinese government. Two were remade, and two re-voiced. Just before they ran, the Chinese government asked the TAC if they could use its logo in the ads.
Over the years, TAC ads have either been remade or revoiced by government departments in the European Union, the UK, Ireland, South Africa, Vietnam and Bosnia-Herzegovina. The strategy has been used wholesale in New Zealand.
The TAC’s 2005 drink drive ad Haunted bears an uncanny resemblance to the Think UK campaign that ran three years later. Frustratingly for Grey Melbourne, Think UK’s agency AMV BBDO won more lions at Cannes with their effort.
25 of TAC’s most powerful ads
Robin Hicks is the Melbourne editor of Mumbrella
Step 1. Induce behaviour change by scaring the bejezus out of people.
Step 2. Reclaim the term “social marketing” from facebook, Twitter, Pinterest.
Step 3. ???
Step 4. Profit.
User ID not verified.
Doesn’t the graph point to a uniform national decline? Other States started higher, and finished higher, but seem to have fallen in tandem.
User ID not verified.
/agrees with toby. The graph does not show what the story says it does.
User ID not verified.
The graph starts in 2003, 14 years after the TAC work first appeared, so I’m not sure that it’s anywhere near relevant. If it shows anything, it’s that the TAC work is no more effective than the work done in other states over the last 9 years.
My personal opinion is that reduction in road fatalities has as much to do with improved safety technologies (airbags, etc) and stricter laws regarding drink/driving, the introduction of 50 zones, etc… as it does this campaign.
I’d also imagine that the effect of the campaign is nowhere near what it was back in the day. You kinda get used to the TAC style now, and I reckon it’s time for them to reinvent the formula.
Still a great campaign though.
User ID not verified.
Well done to John and the whole TAC team (past and present) and Randall and Nigel and the team at Grey. Any agency would be proud of the body of work and impact this campaign has had. What is little known is how the TAC work has also influenced car manufacturers not to cut corners when it comes to active and passive safety features. No doubt there are many other aspects of driver saftey that these campaigns have influenced. Deserved kudos for doing something that has genuienly saved Australian lives.
User ID not verified.
Stricter laws have probably been partly driven by the effects of this type of advertising though. The advertising reached the politicians who initiate change, and the people who, a few years ago, wrote letters to the paper.
As well, this is an interesting topic because it’s been contested. Many passionate groups opposed safety measures such as speed cameras and even seat belts. I think the strong advertising support played a role in overcoming the objections of those critics.
User ID not verified.
I remember these ads as a young girl living in Melbourne and although they were horrific, they were brilliant and set out what they aimed to acheive – reducing road accidents and relaxed attitudes toward safe driving.
Wish they had these ads here in Queensland, Im sure we would see alot less people taking crazy risks on the roads.
User ID not verified.
Great Stuff, As a volunteer emergency services personnel in country WA, I have seen some of this happen. I can be a bloody mess at the time… the next day usually hurts a bloody sight more!
User ID not verified.
@Hmmm is correct. Research by the Australian Government’s Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economics shows that almost all the reduction in road fatalities since the 1960s is due to:
mandatory seat belts
random breath testing
the introduction of speed cameras.
User ID not verified.
A lot of commenters here seem to be assuming that the advertising claims to be totally responsible for the reduction. Not so.
TAC advertising has always been part of of a three tier strategy: education, enforcement, and engineering.
Better engieering, i.e. improving the safety of both vehicles and road design has contributed. As has enforcement; putting booze buses where people couldn’t avoid getting tested was just as powerful a means of changing actual drink drive behaviour as the ads were in changing attitudes to that behaviour. But the ads themselves were very powerful.
Congratulations to the entire team for an object lesson in how to do it right: client, advertising and research agencies all working together in pursuit of a long-term goal.
User ID not verified.
@Shanghai, I think the problem we have is that the statistics in the article — and other authoritative research, like the BITRE report I mentioned — suggest the advertising has had no effect at all.
User ID not verified.
Im not convinced the advertising had no impact. The available stats simply suggest that it had the same impact as other campaigns nationally
User ID not verified.
Great directors, wonderful work. Bit of an oversight missing Mat Humphrey off the list though, considering he directed Combi and a significant chunk of the work that won internationally…Haunted, Never and more.
User ID not verified.
Mat Humphrey has directed more TAC Commercial’s then any other director.
He won International awards with Greg and Rob way back in 94 for ‘Nightshift’ then ‘Bush Telegraph’ and ‘Motherless Child’.
He won more international awards with Nigel for ‘Never’ and ‘Haunted’.
He directed the extremely successful ‘Ken Lay’ campaign and last years ‘Bloody idoit’ spot for Pete and Nigel.
That’s 18 years for great work.
Yes, perhaps a bit of an oversight to miss Mat Humphrey off the list of directors.
User ID not verified.
Having come across this article a couple of weeks ago (and watched the ads) I’ve since made an effort to be more careful on the road. I think it’s safe to say they’ve influenced driver behaviour (as well as pressure on law makers and car manufacturers) in regards to road safety.
Mum in a hurry really stood out for me – she’s not the typical drink driver/rev head you see in a commercial targetting road safety.
User ID not verified.