<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murdoch: We&#8217;ll probably remove our sites from Google&#8217;s index</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366</link>
	<description>Everything under Australia’s media, marketing &#38; entertainment umbrella</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RingerMe</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-23022</link>
		<dc:creator>RingerMe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-23022</guid>
		<description>Great idea!   Better yet, Google should remove every instance, then charge him to come back on Google.    The stupid, greedy, , ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea!   Better yet, Google should remove every instance, then charge him to come back on Google.    The stupid, greedy, , ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-22443</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-22443</guid>
		<description>Sponsorship of Content vs End User Paying only works where the amount the end user pays is wothwhile. 99.5% of what we consume online we can not see a value in paying for. 

So the sponsorship model is the only viable way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sponsorship of Content vs End User Paying only works where the amount the end user pays is wothwhile. 99.5% of what we consume online we can not see a value in paying for. </p>
<p>So the sponsorship model is the only viable way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoch: News Corp to Hide Paid Content from Google - Requiem</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-22300</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoch: News Corp to Hide Paid Content from Google - Requiem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-22300</guid>
		<description>[...] Paul on Nov.20, 2009, under Technology  Rupert Murdoch says in this video he would make News Corp&#8217;s paid content invisible from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paul on Nov.20, 2009, under Technology  Rupert Murdoch says in this video he would make News Corp&#8217;s paid content invisible from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google to limit access of free content - mUmBRELLA</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-22280</link>
		<dc:creator>Google to limit access of free content - mUmBRELLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-22280</guid>
		<description>[...] follows criticism from media companies, including News Corp&#8217;s Rupert Murdoch, who has threathened to make its content unfindable to users on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] follows criticism from media companies, including News Corp&#8217;s Rupert Murdoch, who has threathened to make its content unfindable to users on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Wood</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-22143</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-22143</guid>
		<description>Look I know you probably can&#039;t imagine paid news content working, but if you could how would it work?  
We all run our own media empires differently, and all of your comments sound so absolute, it is the end of RM. Do you think RM could have a team of advisors, quite possibly as intelligent and savvy as you? Probably. So could it work? Hell yeah! There is a business model which works and just because you can&#039;t fathom it, doesn&#039;t  make it impossible. Maybe you are thinking the content will be the same. Maybe you believe that total traffic numbers have intrinsic value to advertisers. Imagine visitors have habits, like, I don&#039;t know, bite, snack, meal the headlines, sport, weather and leave. Imagine profiling your visitor and making available compelling content which enriches their lives and advertisers which could align their customers&#039; profiles. Crazy huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look I know you probably can&#8217;t imagine paid news content working, but if you could how would it work?<br />
We all run our own media empires differently, and all of your comments sound so absolute, it is the end of RM. Do you think RM could have a team of advisors, quite possibly as intelligent and savvy as you? Probably. So could it work? Hell yeah! There is a business model which works and just because you can&#8217;t fathom it, doesn&#8217;t  make it impossible. Maybe you are thinking the content will be the same. Maybe you believe that total traffic numbers have intrinsic value to advertisers. Imagine visitors have habits, like, I don&#8217;t know, bite, snack, meal the headlines, sport, weather and leave. Imagine profiling your visitor and making available compelling content which enriches their lives and advertisers which could align their customers&#8217; profiles. Crazy huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Free Content</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-22136</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Free Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-22136</guid>
		<description>An interesting article from the BBC regarding the Johnston Press sites in the UK being locked down:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8385342.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting article from the BBC regarding the Johnston Press sites in the UK being locked down:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8385342.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8385342.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Bun is itching</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-21997</link>
		<dc:creator>My Bun is itching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-21997</guid>
		<description>To wipe it with the used newspapers RUPERT is supplying - $2 - weekend edition - more paper than the average 3 X double ply toilet roll - Its 2009 - going on 2010 Rupert Free INTERNET - seeya</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To wipe it with the used newspapers RUPERT is supplying &#8211; $2 &#8211; weekend edition &#8211; more paper than the average 3 X double ply toilet roll &#8211; Its 2009 &#8211; going on 2010 Rupert Free INTERNET &#8211; seeya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diggings &#187; Pulling The Plug On Your Own Life-Support Machine</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-21816</link>
		<dc:creator>Diggings &#187; Pulling The Plug On Your Own Life-Support Machine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-21816</guid>
		<description>[...] In the absolute block-headed department, Belo and MediaNews are apparently joining sides with Rupert in blocking Google from indexing their content. News Corp may have a slight chance of doing this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the absolute block-headed department, Belo and MediaNews are apparently joining sides with Rupert in blocking Google from indexing their content. News Corp may have a slight chance of doing this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft e Sua Tática para Ganhar Mais Market Share &#124; Mestre SEO</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-21812</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft e Sua Tática para Ganhar Mais Market Share &#124; Mestre SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-21812</guid>
		<description>[...] of search search share in six months)&#8220;. A idéia do artigo gira em torno de um comentário de um comentário do Rupert Murdoch dizendo que a Newscorp iria bloquear toda a indexação que o Google faz de seus jornais e [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of search search share in six months)&#8220;. A idéia do artigo gira em torno de um comentário de um comentário do Rupert Murdoch dizendo que a Newscorp iria bloquear toda a indexação que o Google faz de seus jornais e [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Se l&#8217;informazione diventa a pagamento. Scenari del web che verrà.</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-21811</link>
		<dc:creator>Se l&#8217;informazione diventa a pagamento. Scenari del web che verrà.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-21811</guid>
		<description>[...] far uscire la sua News Corporation da Google è apparsa la prima volta il 9 novembre scorso in un sito di informazione Australiano specializzato su media e marketing. Da allora si è scatenato un vero e [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] far uscire la sua News Corporation da Google è apparsa la prima volta il 9 novembre scorso in un sito di informazione Australiano specializzato su media e marketing. Da allora si è scatenato un vero e [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Adamson</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-21458</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Adamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-21458</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Nathan that is seems odd that RM thinks a qualified visitor is a random hit worth nothing. Isn&#039;t a search visitor worth as much as Google makes from Adwords which is also bucketloads higher margin than RM is making from his news properties?

Although he has said some odd things lately I&#039;m surprised so many people comment about him so personally. I think he&#039;s one of our greatest business people and visionaries.

He has said many many things over the last 20 years during his visits back here which Australia could have used to generate enormous extra wealth and stopped the standard of living continuing to fall during that whole period. Instead of relying on beaches, minerals and overseas students we could have been something different and more in tune with leading countries. Of course his ideas and comments were poopooed and scoffed at by local politicians of both sides and local business leaders.

I wish we had many more Murdochs, but at the same time I don&#039;t understand where he is coming from recently, but he may yet surprise us.

Walter Adamson @g2m
http://xeesm.com/walter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Nathan that is seems odd that RM thinks a qualified visitor is a random hit worth nothing. Isn&#8217;t a search visitor worth as much as Google makes from Adwords which is also bucketloads higher margin than RM is making from his news properties?</p>
<p>Although he has said some odd things lately I&#8217;m surprised so many people comment about him so personally. I think he&#8217;s one of our greatest business people and visionaries.</p>
<p>He has said many many things over the last 20 years during his visits back here which Australia could have used to generate enormous extra wealth and stopped the standard of living continuing to fall during that whole period. Instead of relying on beaches, minerals and overseas students we could have been something different and more in tune with leading countries. Of course his ideas and comments were poopooed and scoffed at by local politicians of both sides and local business leaders.</p>
<p>I wish we had many more Murdochs, but at the same time I don&#8217;t understand where he is coming from recently, but he may yet surprise us.</p>
<p>Walter Adamson @g2m<br />
<a href="http://xeesm.com/walter" rel="nofollow">http://xeesm.com/walter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should newspapers charge for news online or buy into the Google dream? : MediaVision Blog : Search Engine Marketing</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-21345</link>
		<dc:creator>Should newspapers charge for news online or buy into the Google dream? : MediaVision Blog : Search Engine Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-21345</guid>
		<description>[...] by Frances van den Berg on 19 Nov 2009 &#124; Tagged as: Search Engine News   Last week New Corporation declared that they may start charging for news online and stop allowing Google to index their stories. Yet, Google has declared their commitment to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Frances van den Berg on 19 Nov 2009 | Tagged as: Search Engine News   Last week New Corporation declared that they may start charging for news online and stop allowing Google to index their stories. Yet, Google has declared their commitment to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This week in media musings: Murdoch&#8217;s game of chicken, and a lesson in process journalism &#124; Mark Coddington</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-21076</link>
		<dc:creator>This week in media musings: Murdoch&#8217;s game of chicken, and a lesson in process journalism &#124; Mark Coddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-21076</guid>
		<description>[...] talk this week: Rupert Murdoch. After months of talking around it, he finally made a splash by telling an Australian interviewer he plans to remove all of News Corp.&#8217;s sites&#8217; content from Google&#8217;s search index. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] talk this week: Rupert Murdoch. After months of talking around it, he finally made a splash by telling an Australian interviewer he plans to remove all of News Corp.&#8217;s sites&#8217; content from Google&#8217;s search index. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Drill Down 112 &#8211; Searching For a Good Search &#124; The Drill Down</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-21070</link>
		<dc:creator>The Drill Down 112 &#8211; Searching For a Good Search &#124; The Drill Down</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-21070</guid>
		<description>[...] Tops Vulnerability List Murdoch: Well probably remove our sites from Google&#8217;s index Google says Murdoch stories can be taken off Botnet responsible for a third of the world&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tops Vulnerability List Murdoch: Well probably remove our sites from Google&#8217;s index Google says Murdoch stories can be taken off Botnet responsible for a third of the world&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holgs</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/murdoch-well-probably-remove-our-sites-from-googles-index-11366#comment-20895</link>
		<dc:creator>Holgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=11366#comment-20895</guid>
		<description>People here seem to think that Google is an invincible giant and will always be the portal to the internet. Think back a few years and nobody had even heard of &quot;Google&quot;. 

Remember when Microsoft was the unassailable leader of the IT world? 

While Google has some noble aspirations - it also still earns 99% of its revenue from advertising. Much of that advertising depends on some pretty hefty invasion of user&#039;s privacy to target content. 

More and more content providers are realising that despite the power of Google, its can be a pretty ineffective form of monetisation. If there is a shift away from advertising with Google, the company will quite quickly start to look like an empty house of cards. 

In the long term I think Murdoch will be on the winning side of this debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People here seem to think that Google is an invincible giant and will always be the portal to the internet. Think back a few years and nobody had even heard of &#8220;Google&#8221;. </p>
<p>Remember when Microsoft was the unassailable leader of the IT world? </p>
<p>While Google has some noble aspirations &#8211; it also still earns 99% of its revenue from advertising. Much of that advertising depends on some pretty hefty invasion of user&#8217;s privacy to target content. </p>
<p>More and more content providers are realising that despite the power of Google, its can be a pretty ineffective form of monetisation. If there is a shift away from advertising with Google, the company will quite quickly start to look like an empty house of cards. </p>
<p>In the long term I think Murdoch will be on the winning side of this debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

