Why politicians can’t sell
Recently Prime Minister Tony Abbott was criticised for not being a good enough salesman for his policies. Here Elliot Epstein looks at how politicians could improve their sales technique to their electorate.
Law, Unions, Engineering, Journalism, Small Business, Academia and Agriculture have all delivered people to politics.
But the world of high stakes senior sales professionals, steeped in the art and science of winning complex, competitive multi-million dollar deals has not regularly supplied our parliaments with its exquisitely skilled members.
The pay cut would kill them for a start, and the expense account scrutiny would deter the rest.
Typically, corporate sales can’t handle politics and politicians can’t sell.
We, the electorate, languish amidst debate, despair and disaffection vainly hoping that our leaders will suddenly discover the ability to deliver the messages that inspire, reassure and invigorate our lives. But, it never happens. The disenchantment festers and politicians now get voted out every nine and half minutes.
The irony is that like all buyers we subconsciously want to be sold to, no matter how much we deny it.
Top corporate sales people know that the product is not the issue because they still win business when they’re more expensive, less credentialed or have inferior features.
Contrary to many of the pundits raving about policy decisions, the political products are not the issue either. Both Liberal and Labor have manufactured their own home brands called ‘Ideology’.
Their political warehouses are full of them on Budget Reform, Medicare, Asylum Seekers, Education, Tax, Child Care etc. and then they try to flog them.
Their sales figures are not good.
Here are three key things our pollies could learn from corporate sales gurus.
1. ‘I don’t care how much you know until I know how much you care’
Selling at the highest levels is highly collaborative at all levels of client engagement. They do not make recommendations until they have deeply understood the client’s culture, current thinking, past decision making history, emotional drivers of key executives, financial goals and insecurities. And, they consult widely to build a case that connects emotionally to the egos and ambitions of decision makers and influencers.
Companies that don’t demonstrate genuine care and simply try to prove that they’re the experts, droning on about why their product is just the ducks’ nuts and more technically correct, inevitably lose out to the emotionally intelligent.
That’s why we switch off the pollies. We don’t want to be told your policy is fantastic. We want to feel that you deeply understand its impact on us as human beings first. If we don’t trust that you care that much, we’ll smash you as soon as you make your first mistake.
We want to feel that you understand our concept of fairness, not yours.
2. ‘Pleeeeease, talk to us like a real person’
The old days of selling involved Willy Loman like characters who created a different persona and convoluted language to try and convince people often against their will.
It says 2015 on my iPhone and current day sales experts are conversational, relaxed, willing to concede faults all in the name of getting the best result for the client and by default for them.
Politicians are now Manchurian candidates controlled by advisors, apparatchiks, minders and other bedwetting, anxiety driven control freaks.
The politicians I’ve coached have had to sneak out to see me like they’re doing a clandestine drug deal because if their staff found out they’d freak out and turn into reactionary parents who ban undesirable friends from the house.
The lame excuse for the stage managed, manicured messaging is that the 24-hour news cycle and social media will catch them out without that level of control.
However, if our leaders are not authentic, conversational, relaxed and engaging, we won’t listen.
If we’re not listening, all that effort creating too clever by half messaging is totally wasted.
If we’re not listening, it’s as if you haven’t said it at all.
3. Trust is a verb
Most successful sales people are totally relatable to their clients – that’s how trust is generated.
They provide loads of reassurance, case studies, evidence, pilot programs, stakeholder engagement sessions to prove not just that their solution works, but that it works in that client’s specific environment at this specific time in history.
They don’t get ahead of themselves or get carried away with future opportunities until they’ve proven that they’re true trusted advisors.
Then, they do what they said they’d do.
They don’t upsell before the first implementation is bedded down. They don’t put a quote in for $1.2M and then invoice $2.6M because they’ve got a budget shortfall.
Real professionals take great care to empathise and relate, knowing that the trust generated will pay off for years to come.
Politics is about selling ideas and policies to millions of people who desperately want them to succeed.
Maybe an authentic, skilled sales professional will one day give up the Audi for a ComCar and take his or her place in Parliament.
What would be even better is an emotionally intelligent politician who can learn to sell.
- Elliot Epstein is CEO of Salient Communication
nice article. good read.
User ID not verified.
Beautifully put.
I suspect there are two ways we might get politicians who can sell. Either they become enamoured with politics before they realise what they could earn in sales (P. Keating), or they earn so much dosh early on that by the time they enter politics the money doesn’t matter (M Turnbull).
User ID not verified.
It has nothing to do with the sales pitch. In fact, they have the sale pitch down pat.
The problem is a lack of values.
What does the Liberal Party stand for that the Labor Party doesn’t, and vice versa?
If you tell me it is economic rationalism v socialism then I’d say you’ve been sold to very well. (Labor has done more to advance economic rationalism than the Liberal Party…Abbott’s signature policy; one of the most generous maternity leave schemes in the world.)
The reality is both parties developed an opportunistic approach to policy in an attempt to leverage the media cycle against the other. The media cycle has now accelerated to the point where they cannot keep their ever shifting policy agenda ahead of it. The result, every leader making poor policy on the fly. (Why do opposition leaders say nothing these days? Ask Hewson about the GST on a store bought cake…You wait for the government to make a mistake and let the media go to town.)
If they were values driven as opposed to poll driven you would see much less shifting of position. They would be rooted in something more longer term than the media cycle and “selling” policy. The debate would deepen, not get broader.
Love or hate them, the Greens have largely retained their voting base at every election because they are values driven.They have moved less than 1% of total votes between 2007 and 2013. (No, I’m not a Green voter.)
So the answer is not better selling. It is values driven politics.
Whilst ever Labor and the Libs attempt to manufacture broad appeal then we will continue to see ridiculous promises and missed expectations.
Given society has gone niche in just about every other facet of life I don’t see why our political system isn’t about to do the same.
The future is issue/value driven minor parties controlling the balance of power. It is minority (small c) coalition governments.
It isn’t about better selling.
User ID not verified.
Spot on, Epstein had me with his opener – “I don’t care how much you know until I know how much you care!” Brilliant.
User ID not verified.
Damn, @technojames, mind if I steal some of that? Very good analysis.
User ID not verified.
i like this article a lot and @technojames that’s one of the comments of the year so far, very good, clear, accurate.
User ID not verified.
@techno james – totally agreed.
The reality is, of the two major parties, there are some really good guys on both teams, however there, sadly, are many very unethical being’s with very short term agenda’s, often agenda’s their power thirsty ‘client’s’. Do either major party really care about the interests of the Australian people? Some and if you compare ALP’s policies v LNP’s, you would have to say that The ALP did care, however Murdoch had to take that out, as did the miners. Gina doesn’t want to pay tax…
The Greens is a great example used above, of a party who’s purpose is clear and it hasn’t changed, it doesn’t waiver and it will not be influenced by big business, nor religion. They have a long term agenda to create a sustainable world. The mainstream media have done a good job in making the Greens appear to be ‘loony lefties’. I would guess that there are lots of ‘closet’ Greens voters, due to the public stereo type of a ‘Greenie’? That is why their vote is on the up. I agree; people agree with their values and policy represents those values and that purpose.
One of the things we do not seem to have in either of the two big parties is a real leader. There might be potential leaders in the mist of both parties, however due to the red-tape and so many agenda’s and palms being greased, they are not getting their heads above the clouds to drive either party forward.
Do we need change? As the public become far more informed through freedom of information, (digital revolution), do we need to shake the political system up as the previously un-informed are becoming far more aware?
Is it time for change?
User ID not verified.
Tony’s sales technique to get elected was the old list of boxes to tick. Repeated ad naseum. Stop the boats, get rid of the carbon tax, get rid of the mining tax, stop the waste. I can’t remember one thing what Labour was offering. The list technique is used in DM because it works. But the repetition comes at a cost. It’s patronising as hell when used on adults. Tony repeats a phrase every time he opens his mouth – as if we’re all deaf, or 5 year olds.
User ID not verified.
@technojames, you’re right in some of what you say but not all.
They haven’t got “the sales pitch down pat”. If you really believe that you must be hearing something different to me.
Yes, there is a lack of values and that’s a major cause of the poor salesmanship job they do. As Elliot so beautifully put it, “I don’t care how much you know until I know how much you care”. We’re unconvinced by their poor salesmanship because they appear to change priorities so often.
I don’t believe political parties can’t have broad appeal. All of them should aspire to similar long-term objectives. The only difference is the route they recommend we take to get there.
User ID not verified.
Thanks for all the great comments.
@techno james …interesting analysis, yet doesn’t the fact that you’re not sold on the parties being values driven prove the point.
Cheers
Elliot
User ID not verified.
@Impressed
I think change is happening. Look at the make-up of the Senate. Look at PUP. Adam Bandt in the Lower House. As we continue to lose faith in the larger parties and their ability to implement policy the electorate will begin fragmenting on issues that are close to them. I think the instability we currently see in government is here to stay and I’m not sure leadership changes will have an impact.
@sub-editor
I’m flattered you think it is worthy of theft. All yours!
@1268
Cheers!
User ID not verified.
@Elliot and Terry
Using the same analogies as the article, the major parties have a product issue, not a sales technique problem.
User ID not verified.
This can be a lengthy subject to debate, but it doesn’t need to be.When Politicians STOP being Politicians and start being real-people, their life becomes easier. Gillard made the glaring error of saying ” here is the real Julia” and then Tony deiced to follow her disaster with a similar statement after the ‘almost spill’ … absolute idiots with no confidence to actually BE themselves … why ? They are sooo frighted of the media. They need to have the goolies to stand up and BE who they are and the Aussie public will support them. So Tony, STOP trying to be PC all the time, and tell-it-like-it-is and you will become a fine and highly successful Salesperson …it is not about Policies it is about TRUST, and trust comes from being up-front and telling it like it is – yes it has to be ‘sold’ not ‘told’ but that is not difficult … deal done !
User ID not verified.
Malcom made clear his communcation technique on Q&A.
Explain to people without dumbing it down, and people will come on side.
If my years in advertising has taught me one thing it’s that people mostly use the rational only to justify emotional choices.
Emotional = Can’t stand Abbott.
Rational = Turnbull knows about making money, he could run a country.
Emotional always comes first. Turnbull would not be on the radar without the emotional reaction to Tony.
Turnbull thinks he’s going to lead with a rational approach. Good luck.
User ID not verified.
Agreed Rushdie, they don’t understand emotional connection and its primary role in decision making.
User ID not verified.
Great article. Politicians live only for them selfs and how to get elected again. Kind of like do anything. Lie, deceive act unethically… anything to get elected/get the sale again. Anything but what they were elected to do in the first place.. provide great and responsible governance for the tax paying citizens/customers.
If they were to act in the best interest of their constituents/customers and simply do a great job backed by a solid set of values with integrity they would get elected again and again. repeat business.
User ID not verified.
Good article…..these days the only time you will hear a politician speak like a real person is when they are an ex-politician. Listen to an interview after a political leader has just been knifed in the back, lost an election or resigned and you will get to know the real person…..sadly its only then that the majority (irrespective of political persuasion) actually come across as having started in politics for the right reason.
User ID not verified.
1) You can’t isolate salesmanship – on its own it means little.
2) We are beyond values – capitalism v socialism is a dead end – we need to start thinking about running the country as we might run a company – where’s the growth? how do we provide fulfilment to workers? how can we improve efficiency? how do we incorporate innovation and technology? how do we make the world a better place?
3) Politics needs to be focussed on creation – it is currently mired in opposition
First – what is the vision? What are the things Australia needs to define and develop?
– our position in Asia
– the industries and opportunities we need to invest in
– the reforms required to boost growth / efficiency
– the ways in which we can innovate
Second – define how can the people benefit from any of these ideas
Third – figure out how we can implement / pay for these initiatives
Fourth – figure out how to sell these initiatives – for example by helping people sell them to themselves
User ID not verified.