Comments on: PR vs journalists debate concludes: we’re on the same side

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 15 May 2009 07:58:20 +0000

THAT WAS THEN— THIS,O,U NO.SHE WAS IN IT

By: Peter

Peter — Sat, 09 May 2009 00:51:12 +0000

The same side?
‘Journalism’ has nothing to do with the PR side except doubt every utterance and frame. Otherwise we all lose.

By: Pru

Pru — Fri, 08 May 2009 03:19:15 +0000

valence – WT? Your assasination plans will wipe out 80% of the journalist population according to research presented on the night. And I’d suggest everyone in the room that night were “readers”

By: mia

mia — Fri, 08 May 2009 03:18:23 +0000

Valence, don’t sink this debate into low waters. It was a constructive debate and helpful in establising a spirit of recognised, mutual, credible intent and professionalism between the two factions.

By: valence

valence — Thu, 07 May 2009 18:38:46 +0000

of course, if there were readers in the room the PRs would have been assasinated. together with the complying journos. PRs should, generally, be ttreated as spin agents of low purpose. like pimps in brothels or dealers in heroin. journos who deal should similarly be tainted. this is one of the great benefits of the web. it shows you is masturbating. and who is assisiting.

By: Martin Lane

Martin Lane — Thu, 07 May 2009 02:20:22 +0000

Sounds like a rare PR triumph for PRs. In my experience, there are two types of PR – the ones who know what a story is – and the majority.

By: Kimberley Lee

Kimberley Lee — Thu, 07 May 2009 00:03:46 +0000

What a great night and thank you Tim and Alice for your support. Yes, we are working towards a similar goal but we CAN do this in a mutually supportive way with good relationships to produce quality information for our publics.

Check out Twitter #priadebate – we even made it on the trending list!

By: Jen Bishop, Editor, Dynamic Business

Jen Bishop, Editor, Dynamic Business — Wed, 06 May 2009 23:31:05 +0000

How disappointingly sensible and friendly!
Kidding!