<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PRs vs media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mumbrella.com.au/prs-vs-media-24097/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/prs-vs-media-24097</link>
	<description>Everything under Australia’s media and marketing umbrella</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forget #PRFail, what about #Journofail? &#8211; MatthewGain.com</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/prs-vs-media-24097#comment-40957</link>
		<dc:creator>Forget #PRFail, what about #Journofail? &#8211; MatthewGain.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 03:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumbrella.com.au/?p=24097#comment-40957</guid>
		<description>[...] PR industry on the post. Based on her high profile I assume Tiff&#8217;s blog is well visited, the blog was linked to from Mumbrella driving even more traffic, there were journalists that commented on it, so surely PRs were also reading it. Why then had none [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PR industry on the post. Based on her high profile I assume Tiff&#8217;s blog is well visited, the blog was linked to from Mumbrella driving even more traffic, there were journalists that commented on it, so surely PRs were also reading it. Why then had none [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

