ROI on tourism marketing is $16m for every $1m spent, claims a hotel association report
Every $1 million ploughed into marketing Australia to the world generates an additional $16m in spend by overseas tourists and creates an additional 89 jobs, according to research released today.
The findings were contained in a report commissioned by the Tourism Accommodation Australia (TAA), an association which represents hotels across the country, and carried out by research firm Webber Quantitive Consulting.
The study, titled Estimates of the Return on Marketing Investment for Australian Inbound Tourism, concluded that hotels alone receive an extra $4.5m from visitors for every $1m spent promoting the country. The report comes after a Commission of Audit suggested slashing tourism funding by half, although the government decided to leave Tourism Australia’s budget untouched in the budget.
The figures demonstrate the importance of at least maintaining marketing budgets and prove that high profile promotional campaigns drive demand, the TAA said.
“There has been considerable debate over the impact of tourism marketing and its ability to drive greater visitor numbers and foreign income,” TAA managing director Rodger Powell said. “These figures make it clear that the investment in tourism marketing has a significant direct impact on the hotel sector and an even larger benefit for the wider economy through the multiplier effect.”
Powell said the ROI findings were particularly timely given the hotel sector is poised for its largest expansion in 20 years.
“This will create thousands of jobs in the construction and operation phases but for the projects to come to fruition the growth in visitor numbers generated in the past four years needs to continue and aggressive tactical unbound marketing and promotion is required,” he said.
Steve Jones
Could someone please advise whether the report that sits behind this press release is publicly available? Cheers.
User ID not verified.
I too would love to see the research – because I don’t believe you can be that exacting and account for every environmental factor that might contribute to movements in visitor numbers. Sounds like someone is just trying to justify their strategy.
User ID not verified.
I think there is a bull loose in the top paddock judging by this excrement.
User ID not verified.
Sorry but economists in government are pretty wised up regarding the multiplier effect and take this spin with a grain of salt. Why should the taxpayer subsidise tourism marketing while at the same time it is reducing funding to the CSIRO and reducing staff in the tax office? It really has become an endless handout propped up by dubious research. So which lobbyist has the ear of the Minister?
User ID not verified.
Points well mad Harry.
Clearly if taxation funds are returned to individual taxpayers it is seen as a “hand-out”, but taxation funds returned to businesses are seen as a “hand-up” by the current mob in charge.
I think the broader question should be … which lobbyist DOESN’T have the ear of the Minister.
Just look at the number of roads (NorthConnex) and redevelopments (Rozelle/WhiteBay) that are lobbyist driven with private sector gain at their heart.
User ID not verified.