SMH journalists to question management about UTS paid liftout
Fairfax is again facing questions about its labelling of advertorial content with journalists at The Sydney Morning Herald understood to be questioning management about the online declarations of a paid liftout for University of Technology Sydney (UTS).
Yesterday UTS paid The Sydney Morning Herald to distribute copies of their 8 page magazine Brink. As part of the deal the content, largely authored by former Herald journalist Wendy Frew, was also published on the SMH website under the label “Content by UTS”, with a publishing credit at the end of the piece.
Mumbrella understands the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance, the union which represents journalists, is set to raise concerns with management about the paid content and its labelling with a number of journalists concerned “Content by X” may become a new standard as Fairfax moves to expand its branded content offering.
Fairfax boss Greg Hywood recently flagged the media company would be expanding its content marketing offering and yesterday announced the promotion of Simon Smith as managing director of Fairfax Content Marketing.
A Fairfax spokesman declined to be drawn on whether it had any concerns about the labelling of paid content and multiple “Content by UTS” articles appearing across various sections of the website, including business, environment and entertainment, except to say: “It’s very clearly labelled.”
The publishing credit in the online copy at the end of the piece reads: “This story written and produced by the University of Technology, Sydney, for Brink, a publication distributed monthly in The Sydney Morning Herald.”
However, a number of SMH journalists Mumbrella spoke to said this did not explain the university had paid Fairfax to publish the content.
Jacqui Wise director of UTS’s marketing and communication unit said this was not the first time Brink magazine had been distributed through Fairfax. She also noted the “Content by UTS” labelling online was consistent with what was done in print.
“This is a matter for Fairfax if the journalists have problem with Fairfax and the way they have handled it, that’s not really a problem for us until they come back and say we need to change this, which at this point they haven’t done”, said Wise.
“I’m not sure I see the problem here, we pay for a supplement to go in the paper, every printed page and every story in the iPad version and online is marked as a UTS piece of work.”
Fairfax has previously run into trouble over its labelling of advertorial content. In 2012 the Australian Press Council upheld a complaint by Coalition MP Paul Fletcher finding that “Update on NBN” was not a sufficient labelling of the paid content.
Nic Christensen
Typical MEAA. Fiddle while Rome burns.
User ID not verified.
and yet the MEAA is the first to express outrage when journalists lose jobs as newspaper revenues run dry. Wake up, and get a grip on what’s happening in the real world.
User ID not verified.
in 2013 I find these concerns so yesterday. Haven seen the content it is clearly labelled as content by and from UTS, so what is the issue? Independence Always is key and a core to Fairfax but executions of this nature are normal and have been happening for many many years, why the concern?
User ID not verified.
There is a big difference between paid ads and news articles. The UTS content is PAID content. It should not be put on the SMH website as news.
User ID not verified.
“This story written and produced by the University of Technology, Sydney, for Brink, a publication distributed monthly in The Sydney Morning Herald.” – How does that not explain that Fairfax was paid??? #firstworldproblems
User ID not verified.
The union should be more worred that Brink was the best part of Thursday’s paper.
User ID not verified.
This exactly why Fairfax cannot suceed as a content marketer while simultaneously trumpeting its ‘independence’
User ID not verified.
Times must be tough for Fairfax if they’re accepting paid content from UTS.
User ID not verified.
Can’t the union find a real fight to pick? Is it really the end of journalism as we know it? No. So move on!
User ID not verified.
Happy to be proven wrong but my gut feeling is noone reads Brink, it’s a huge waste of UTS’ money. If anyone’s worried about it, it should be them for the massive outlay for nothing!
User ID not verified.
Stir Fry, summed it. MEAA = irrelevant in 2013
User ID not verified.
A strategic move by UTS cashing in on the herald redundancies and using ex-herald staff to write these stories which read more like advertorials.
So much for an ‘independent’ publication.
User ID not verified.
Student newspapers have come a long way. In the 1980s when I was editor of the student paper at Canberra University we brokered a deal with the boss of the Queanbeyan newspaper for cheap printing. We did the distribution ourselves. Now uni papers are being published as supplements by the big boys.
User ID not verified.
The MEAA isn’t known as the “clown’s union” for any other reason than under siege print journalists are just another group in its eclectic membership – unemployed actors and performers, including clowns and jugglers, are also in there somewhere. When I took an inevitable redundancy from a major print concern a few years back the MEAA’s help amounted to “well, you’ve had a good go” – the implication being they didn’t give a rat’s. That’s what 30 plus years of paying dues got me.
User ID not verified.
“The Sydney Morning Herald understood to be questioning management about a recent the online declarations of a paid liftout for University of Technology Sydney (UTS).”
Looks like a typo…
User ID not verified.