Survey finds 90% of APAC web users would consider using ad blockers, ad tech firm suggests ‘polite advertising’ as a solution
A survey by ad tech firm Unruly has found that nine in 10 internet users in Asia Pacific would consider using ad blockers, with two thirds of Australian respondents saying they are put off a brand when obliged to watch a pre-roll ad.
Under half (45%) of Southeast Asians felt the same way; however, Southeast Asian users are more averse to retargeting, with 67% saying that they find ads that follow them around the internet creepy – the global average is 63%.
More than half of Australian users (77%) said they would lose trust in a brand if they felt an ad lacked authenticity compared with 86% of Southeast Asian respondents who felt the same way.
Three-quarters of those asked (77%) said they mute the sound of video ads, adding weight to the thinking that video creative should work just as well without sound.
The survey revealed more than half of Australian respondents (68%) would like to be able to control video ads, compared with the global average of 61%.
Unruly has partnered with media agency Mindshare to develop a manifesto for digital advertising to mitigate the threat of ad blocking technology, which is predicted to curb $41bn in internet advertising spend this year globally.
The manifesto sets out pillars to help brands understand why ad blocking is on the rise and what they can do to be part of the solution rather than the problem, which Unruly APAC boss Phil Townend has pegged as “polite advertising”.
He commented on the results of the survey, which found that 90% of APAC internet users are using or would consider using ad blocking software because they feel there are too many ads and they find them creepy: “The industry has largely adopted an interruptive video model, which is a hangover from TV, and consumers are being bombarded with hard sell sales messages which deliver little emotional value.”
“You could argue we’re hurtling towards an ‘ad-pocalypse’, where there’s a real risk that consumers will abandon advertising if brands don’t listen to the signals and adopt more engaging, non-invasive ad strategies for the long term,” he said.
“We launched the APAC Future Video Manifesto to help brands in the region rebuild trust, re-connect with consumers and re-set the ad economy so we can collectively survive the existential threats that face the ad industry in the 21st Century and realise the full potential of video as a medium.”
“Consumers are fed up with ad clutter – too many anti-social, interruptive ads. The solution is polite advertising: polite-page loading, respectful ad formats that give a better user experience, and better ads in the first place – content that’s worth watching,” Townend said.
The manifesto proposes that ‘less is more’ and brands should run fewer – and higher quality – ads per page and fewer ad tags per placement, which will means less clutter and faster page loading for readers.
It also suggests giving control of the ad to the viewer, so that they can minimise, pause, mute or close the ad if they want to.
Publishers should let the user see the content first before serving an ad, which Unruly refers to as “polite placements” that are less likely to annoy the user.
The manifesto also proposes better targeting using frequency capping, emotional ad targeting and sequential targeting “to tell better stories”.
Testing and learning the right creative approach and adopting a mobile-first strategy are also features of the Manifesto.
Mindshare APAC’s chief digital officer, Sanchit Sanga, said that the sharp rise of online video viewing in the region has created “the single largest opportunity and threat for marketers.”
“Consumer-centric companies will recreate their content pipes and storytelling techniques at the core to address these fleeting, restless and picky audiences,” he said.
“Relevant, targeted, native and contextual video which doesn’t disrupt viewing patterns will be the mainstay for successful video delivery. Conversely, dumping and spraying 30-second commercials across the web, solely looking at old world metrics alone, like eGRPs, will spell doomsday for brands of today and tomorrow.”
The prevalence of ad blocking software in Asia is believed to be relatively low given that the region – with the exception of markets such as Australia – has a low iPhone penetration compared with Samsung and other smartphone brands, which are yet to introduce their own ad blocking software.
Anti-consumer adds are annoying but frankly its become crazy to not use ad blocker. Ads are now one of the most common delivery methods for malware. By not having an ad blocker running (there are plenty for anyone who is about to criticise the popular one for letting some through) you basically run the risk of virus download on most websites now.
User ID not verified.
not mention the data they chew through. So many people i know tell me their biggest complaint regarding ads is the data they eat on their mobile plans and the subsequent expensive cost of topping up the allowance
User ID not verified.
Marketing companies are simply too lazy (or incompetent, or scared) to adapt their TV commercials to websites. Pop-ups may generate lots of click throughs, but are the really effective at selling ?
Ad-blockers are an excellent way of clagging up your system to run at the speed of a ‘386, unreliably.
User ID not verified.
I’ve used my ad blocker for a while and it causes no noticeable decrease in performance… in fact my browsing experience is sped up with quicker page loads and not having to wait for ads to let me close/minimise them. Also don’t have to waste time moving back or closing a window after accidentally clicking on a takeover that springs up when i’m trying to click a link
User ID not verified.
When SBS Television first introduced advertising, it promised that the ads would be upmarket, tasteful and in keeping with the kind of audience it then had. Optus, Volvo, certainly nothing crass. Now it advertises impotence cures and funeral insurance, and on occasion has even resorted to Ashley Madison promotions.
Somehow I doubt that the future of the Web will see “polite-page loading, respectful ad formats that give a better user experience, content that’s worth watching”.
User ID not verified.
I know when a contract can be enforced and cannot be enforced. In reference to ad-blockers, the end user has the determining right if they want ads or not, it is their system. Additionally, Eyeo who makes Ad Block Plus was in court again and won as expected . Excerpt “ The judge said it is perfectly legal for people to install ad-blockers in their browsers as publishers have no contracts with their readers that insist they have to look at the ads.” And this is 100% accurate – if a contract does not exist between the site and the user the no ads can be enforced or pushed without consent. Full article here: http://fortune.com/2016/03/30/…
Additionally, The ‘implied contract’ theory that we’ve agreed to view ads in exchange for free content is void because we can’t review the terms first — as soon as we follow a link, our browsers load, execute, transfer, and track everything embedded by the publisher. Our data, battery life, time, and privacy are taken by a blank check with no recourse.” Every time you visit a website with an ad, it’s an implied contract, but since you cannot view all the terms it’s void and cannot be enforced. However under contract law, the only valid contracts are those signed in ink and both parties. Something you cannot do online, and these “bluff statements” like “by continuing to use this site you agree or our terms and conditions” are not legal either.
User ID not verified.