Ted Horton: Awards are like the new FIFA they’ve ‘corrupted what we’re here for’
Creative ad legend Ted Horton has compared agencies chasing awards to a cult, suggesting the desire for awards has “corrupted what we’re here for”.
Speaking at today’s Mumbrella360 conference in Sydney the founder of creative ad agency Big Red, best known for its recent work for Coles, said the awards fascination makes the ad industry as a business look “self-obssessed”.
“I haven’t entered awards since 1991. I stopped because I lived in that world, which I call planet advertising, awards are totally out of control. It’s just taken over,” Horton said.
“It’s a cult, someone said ‘It’s like the new FIFA’. It’s that bad, it’s just corrupted what we’re here for. It’s out of balance. But I understand that people want their work recognised, even Jesus Christ liked to be praised.”
He added: “It used to the cherry on top, the icing on top of the cake, now it’s the entire cake too. It’s like the cake show my wife insists I watch – and it’s all icing and all fancy and it’s all that but I never see them making the cake and that’s what awards and advertising are like now.”
Horton said the drive to win awards is “a little bit cultish”, comparing it to Scientology.
“And so as a business we’re seen as just self-obsessed, it just preys on creatives insecurities,” he said.
“Then we get to the stage where we have to tell them how effective we are, so what do we do? We come up with an award for effectiveness. It’s crazy for even effectiveness we have to have an award for it! It just drives me nuts.”
Horton warned the industry will not have a future if it continues to be so preoccupied with awards.
“It doesn’t have a future if it doesn’t realise we have to actually concentrate on the cake and understand that the cherry and icing is just that, the cherry and icing on top,” he said.
“Otherwise we’ll continue to become less relevant and clients will look elsewhere.”
Horton further warned agencies need to stop living in a bubble where they “believe they’re immune from the same pressures” clients are facing.
“Agencies to be successful have to find better, faster, cheaper ways to do things constantly because I don’t think there’d be a client here who isn’t every day being forced to find a better, faster, cheaper way to produce their products or to sell them,” he said.
“I don’t think agencies can continue to live in this bubble where they try to believe they’re immune from the same pressures our clients find themselves in.
“That’s why our philosophy is better, faster, cheaper not follow the money.”
Miranda Ward
Well said! Wise words from an experienced elder of the industry, but sadly an industry that has little or no regard for wisdom and experience.
The awards-cultism is a by product of the selfie era, where self comes before those you’re meant to serve: clients. And the winner is: narcissism.
User ID not verified.
Ted is correct. In the big agencies, it’s all award focused.
I spend my days putting forward ideas that “must” win awards, or at least are award worthy. This usually means, the idea can not have been done before. It’s genuinely gruelling work for most creatives and not sustainable long term.
User ID not verified.
Finally someone with the courage to say ‘the emperor has no clothes’
User ID not verified.
2008 CANNES FILM LIONS JUDGE – Ted Horton, Executive Creative Director, Big Red Group, Melbourne (far left)
User ID not verified.
The awards oasis is why so many mugs crash and burn before they turn 40, while business focussed creatives like Ted are accepted in the clients boardroom and running a successful business at his age.
User ID not verified.
There are a number of CDs out there that have seen the writing on the wall for big agencies and gone into independent agencies, smaller specialist shops and digital businesses including consultancies. There’s even a few client side.
Get out there, the opportunities are plentiful for creative that know that advertising as practiced by ad agencies is broken.
You’ll never look back.
User ID not verified.
Big Red’s right, but he ain’t going to change a thing. The money tap is the only thing that will drive change. Clients need to look elsewhere and adopt creative and production models that drive business, not Lions.
User ID not verified.
And here is the primary reason why I got out of agency land. Well said.
Makes it impossible to do well by your clients when half the focus is on winning awards.
User ID not verified.
As usual Ted makes a huge amount of sense. The truth is, that sadly, there’s an awful lot of creatives working in big advertising agencies that care far more about awards than they do about their clients business.It’s not necessarily their fault, it’s the agencies they work for that perpetuate that culture.
User ID not verified.
One or two potential clients in the audience eh Teddy, you shameless ad man you. Ha.
User ID not verified.
Finally. Over the years I’ve found clients really only want one thing – and that’s for the money they reluctantly spend to work and work hard. Ted is still a beacon of hope. I still use a lesson he taught me way back (as I do an Isherwood-ism while I’m at it). cheers
User ID not verified.
Is it because Teddy doesn’t win many, it’s a bit hypocritical to bag awards after being a judge and entering in the past, but that’s Ted for you.
User ID not verified.
We are professional service providers. In other words, growth agents. Cheaper and faster is easy to understand. But ‘better’ needs more definition. There’s no doubt some, unfortunately a minority, of very creative and award-winning work does grow business. That’s work that is better. Faster and cheaper does not automatically equal better.
User ID not verified.
If i understand Ted correctly he’s not against what he called ‘the cherry’, just the fact it’s ‘become the whole cake’….so i don’t view his role as a judge remotely hypocritical.
User ID not verified.
Wise words from am experienced elder of the industry ? Well, yes, I suppose that is one way of phrasing an honest reply, but there is more than this to consider.
Awards are fine, they are recognition for having produced something exceptional, but the associated problems are behind three questions: Why? and Who? and For What Purpose? Why did the award come your way, who was behind it? and what were the criteria?
Great cinematography, beautiful shooting, but failed to lift the product in the market place.
Lousy budget, ordinary shooting, simple story, mediocre talent, hey it managed to improved market share.
Awards are fine, we just need to be careful about who is judging, why, and or what purpose. Clever clogs production, high budget, celebrity front people, great scripting and a Hollywood director, will not guarantee a successful ad, but it might encourage the wrong judging panel to give it an award.
User ID not verified.
For years, Patts eschewed awards- until they started doing work good enough to win some. And don’t just blame the agencies, there are plenty of clients out there who love to flaunt them.
User ID not verified.
No wonder we’re obsessed with awards, isn’t AWARD school how most of us get into the industry? That’s based on someone winning!
User ID not verified.