The Australian to turn on paywall on Monday
The Australian’s paywall begins on Monday, News Limited boss John Hartigan has told the company’s staff.
Hartigan said the move – which sees a freemium model with some content remaining free, and some behind a pay wall – “represents a major step in the creation of a sustainable model for quality journalism.”
In an interview with Mumbrella, The Australian’s editor Clive Mathieson said: “There are a lot of sceptics about it. If you ask any consumer are you prepared to pay for something you received for free, the first answer is going to be ‘no of course not’. We do know there are those attitudes out there, but we have information at The Australian written by our reporters that won’t be available elsewhere and that’s the key.”
Pricing starts from a weekly $2.95 for digital only access through to $7.95 a week for digital access and a six day subsctiption to the newspaper. There is a three month free trial running until mid December.
It emerged earlier this week that the paywall would be turned on during October, but Hartigan’s announcement is the first time that the exact timing has been revealed.
Hartigan said:
Dear Colleague,
Next Monday marks an incredible milestone in Australian journalism with the launch of The Australian’s digital subscription service.
This service will pioneer the way Australians consume media.
With a special Digital Pass readers will be able to buy The Australian’s premium content online, on tablets and on a new mobile site.
Subscribers to The Australian newspaper will get full access to the digital platforms free.
All the details are in announcements being made today. Next week The Australian is launching a unique and significant marketing campaign to promote the start of this new era.
This launch represents a major step in the creation of a sustainable model for quality journalism in Australia. I am immensely proud that News is pioneering this innovation.
Great journalism is what we are all about. All of our research and all the indications are that people will pay for great journalism.
Today’s announcement is the culmination of many months hard work by The Australian, the dedicated digital technology subscriptions team, and countless staff across the company.
Building the technology platform to manage digital subscriptions was a huge task, but we have achieved our aims on time and on budget. I thank everyone for their outstanding commitment to the project.
The Australian’s premium digital service is part of how we see the future of journalism.
This week we have also launched a new stand-alone website futureofjournalism.com.au This site is deliberately not a corporate showcase; it is a discussion forum for anyone interested in developments in media. We will commission material for the site, publish our own original thinking, link to the work of others and allow people who don’t work for News to contribute news, ideas, opinion and analysis.
I am confident that premium digital subscription services will be successful in Australia. On Monday, The Australian becomes the first of our mastheads to join a distinguished group of news brands that have already launched these services including The Wall Street Journal, The Financial Times, The Times and The Sunday Times of London and The New York Times.
John Hartigan
News Limited first revealed its paywall strategy in a speech fromThe Australian’s CEO Richard Freudenstein at this year’s Mumbrella360.
News Limited has also launched a website to encourage discussion of the paywall strategy.
Interesting to see if it changes the way journalist’s are remunerated. Financial KPI’s set on page views and paid for subscriptions. I wonder what I’ll be reading in the next year. Bring on a wave of coverage and content compelling enough for me to pay to read or watch and, hopefully, encouraging the art back into captivating headlines. The current economic’s of literature, see you later masthead, Hello journalist, you celebrity you – give me something great to read and I’ll pay for it.
User ID not verified.
If I want to read press releases from the Liberals or the IPA I can go direct to their source at their websites and read then for free.
User ID not verified.
He hit it on the head with: “If you ask any consumer are you prepared to pay for something you received for free, the first answer is going to be ‘no of course not’.”
And I also think those costs sound pretty steep to me…
User ID not verified.
He rejects consumers reality and substitutes his own.
Good luck with that. Make sure your resume is up to date.
User ID not verified.
Why would anyone pay for paid comment?
User ID not verified.
If you get the print edition home delivered, why would you pay extra to see the same stuff on the Net? I don’t get it
User ID not verified.
As the failers point out, there are challenges to come from this decision.
But even The Guardian with its 40m uniques per month still lost £30m GBP last year. Newspapers rarely work on the CPM model, need to make a profit and most have come to realise that there is little value in the casual visitor.
But they will have to persuade people to pay for content and the two elephants in the room are the ABC and the BBC.
Although, perhaps the BBC will start charging non-UK IP visitors?
User ID not verified.
I have read this article this is really a useful for us to know more about the Australian business community, you have posted about that conference and it is really great for us.
User ID not verified.
For a paper whose web site wasn’t good value when it was free charging for it is a brave move. And as Hoin says why should people who pay for the print edition not get free access? There are enough carpetbaggers and chancers on the net without Murdoch joining them. Biting the hand that feeds you is one thing, but shagging it is too much.
User ID not verified.
If fairfax would set up a subscription service I would probably pay for it if it contained everything that was in the printed paper and supplements. Heck even a pdf emailed to me every day would get my money. As it is they give away most of it for free and I don’t know what I’m missing out on. I’m sure there are some people who get the Australian delivered who would cancel and go digital but if you’re not interested enough to buy the Australian now would you be likely to subscribe? The Australian doesn’t have enough unique content that personally interests me but it’s weekend reviews are really pretty good. Will be fascinating to see how it goes but I doubt we’ll get any figures out of them.
User ID not verified.
Steep price for poor content
User ID not verified.
If the rumors about The Daily’s paid-subs levels or The Times online audience figures are even in the ball park, then you would think this would have scared News off pushing ahead with the pay walls… Or at least adjusted their strategy. Maybe it’s working better than the rumors suggest? I would think a $30 sub for the 1st year is low enough to get a large base and convert a percentage back to paying for news over that time. If the other companies see News Ltd. making bank and holding audience while charging for subs, they’ll move to that strategy too – then the companies will all bring the price to a level that keeps the business viable.
User ID not verified.
I ‘spose i’ll just move along.
User ID not verified.
Awesome idea. Because I want to PAY to read their incessant NBN beatups.
User ID not verified.
This will be fascinating to watch. Who knows which way it will go.
Don’t think I will pay but maybe I will miss it?
Chances are there will need to be a big change downwards in their cost base regardless.
User ID not verified.
Oh well – I guess I will move onto other online papers that are FREE. I flatly refuse to pay for something that should be a public right. Free access to national & global events. Besides, the Murdochs literally run an evil empire built on deceit. It’s never enough is it Rupert. A stinking mega rich family that wants more while the rest of us struggle paying for the basics of daily life.
User ID not verified.
Ill be changing my bookmark from “theAu$tralian” to “theABC” and SBS websites to get my content from now on.
User ID not verified.
Have read The Australian for over twenty years and saw some pretty good quality journalism, and access to international partners (especially to fill out Monday edition).
However, in recent years The Australian has been aggressively editorialising and campaigning politically for some retro DLP social type agenda.
I am no bleeding heart liberal but more of a social libertarian and economic rationalist, and while I have taken free digital subscription, I will not pay, why?
Firstly there is plenty of news content online available for free locally and internationally e.g. ABC/Fairfax/Business Spectator and The Economist, Aljazeera etc.
But my main complaint that even if you subscribe, unless you agree or support The Australian’s sometimes socially conservative and/or partisan political editorial line, comments are never published.
This makes a mockery of free press which The Australian promotes and has too many “suggestive” articles and perpetual opinion polls on the same issues which media, political parties and advisors have deemed to be important……. while ignoring the wider world.
User ID not verified.