Australian Women’s Weekly editor on how its latest cover has changed industry attitudes
The cover of the July edition of the Australian Women’s Weekly features the image of ultra-marathon bushfire survivor Turia Pitt, a move which surprised many in an industry driven by image. Editor-in-chief Helen McCabe spoke to Miranda Ward about how the cover came about, and its effect not only on the public, but also the beauty and fashion industries as we.
The July cover of the Australian’s Women’s Weekly has done more to market “what the heart and soul of the magazine is” than anything else the magazine’s editor-in-chief Helen McCabe has done in her five years at the helm.
Speaking to Mumbrella about the July edition which featured Turia Pitt, a survivor of the bushfire that swept through an ultra-marathon in Western Australia’s Kimberly region in September 2011, McCabe said the cover is “a really strong signal to market that this magazine is committed to Australian women, quality stories, independent journalism, long-form story telling and quality writing.
“The magazine was tested by a lot of readers who not had picked it up before, it probably did more to market the magazine and what the heart and soul of the magazine is than anything else I’ve done in the last five years. It sent a strong message to the community about who we are and what we’re doing here,” said McCabe.
While McCabe was unable to share sales details for the issue, citing industry policy around not releasing figures month-on-month, she did say the reach of the cover on Facebook was 2.6m.
She added: “If you put the Facebook reach at that, our readership is 2.2m roughly every month, I imagine this will be substantially above that. Then you add our online site which is about 1m, and there’s only 10 per cent cross over between what goes in the magazine and what’s online, then your reach on this title is phenomenal and that’s where the future lies.
“Magazine circulation is decreasing, but the challenge for me is to make my title decline less than other titles. I have been ambitious about turning that around but in truth, I think flat is the new up, as we laugh here. If you get flat circulation it’s as good as being up. Our circulation is pretty good. But like every print product we are incredibly heartened by what’s going on online and in the digital format.”
“Knowing what I know about the sale figures, would I do it again? Yes,” she added.
Originally the cover wasn’t planned to feature Pitt solo, McCabe explained, but rather a collection of judges for the Women’s Weekly Women of the Future Scholarship competition which include Pitt, Penny Wong, Jennifer Hawkins, Lisa Wilkinson, Ann Sherry, Rachel Griffiths and Jana Wendt.
McCabe explained: “We shot a cover with four of the women in it and that was really designed on who was available on the day.We had a heap of judges coming in and out and it was who could all be there at that particular time. The four of them were Penny Wong, Lisa Wilkinson, Jennifer Hawkins and Turia Pitt.
“That was planned as a cover try, a long shot cover. I wasn’t expecting to do it but if it worked. I was really excited on the day, I thought that could really make a great cover. But by the time I got around to doing it, Turia was in the press. She’d done a 60 Minutes interview and she was awarded compensation from the race organisers which was reportedly $10 million, but from what I understand that’s a fairly substantial overstatement, it wasn’t anywhere near that figure. So she became newsworthy.”
Images of the four judges ran on page seven of the magazine alongside McCabe’s editorial and on the contents page of the magazine.
“When I looked at the images again I just thought why not do her on her own because her story is so incredible and her profile is high enough, everyone knows who she is, everyone admires her. That’s how it came to be,” she said.
“Once we saw it we all felt quite emotional about it and believed it was the right thing to do. It then required a couple of conversations with my publisher who is (Bauer Media CEO) Matt Stanton. When I talked him through it he said ‘well I better come and have a look at it’ and when he did come and look at it he was speechless and went ‘yeah, ok lets do it’. So I didn’t get any significant resistance anywhere.
“There was only the one shot. We didn’t shoot it for a cover, so there wasn’t any choice, it was that picture or nothing. And if you look at the magazine and go inside, we’ve repeated the image because we didn’t have a secondary image and that’s how far the idea was from my mind at that stage.”
McCabe stressed the choice to put Pitt on the cover was about her story and relevance in the news currently.
“Someone sent me a message telling me I challenge you to run a disabled person on the cover, and I thought I’m running her [Pitt] because of her story and she’s relevant,” she said.
“She actually ticks every box of the sorts of women I put on the cover every month: she’s high profile, she’s fascinating, she’s of substance, she’s Australian, she’s overcome some sort of adversity, she has a compelling story to tell and it’s new, there’s developments in her story and her life all the time and you’re interested in what’s going on. So in terms of trying to find that perfect cover person she ticks probably all of the boxes and most women on the cover every month don’t.
“She ticked every box, it wasn’t so much about her image as a superficial consideration, it was about who she is and what she stands for.
“These women don’t come along very often and I’m always on the lookout for a new and interesting woman and story which will appeal to a huge story so it wasn’t that tricky in many ways. She’s the best story in the country right now and that’s the start and stop of the decision making.
“It was one of those things that you couldn’t not do,” McCabe added.
The cover sparked responses from around Australia across social media with many women applauding the move, while international press including The Huffington Post and The Independent also covered it.
“The market wants to be surprised and does want me to do different things and to test the boundaries of what makes up the suite of women in this country who are always on the covers so any opportunity I get to do something a little bit different I will grab it with both hands. But that opportunity doesn’t come very often. It wasn’t that difficult, it was a no-brainer.”
McCabe said whilst there has been a lot of positive reaction from the public, there has also been a lot of positivity from the beauty and fashion industries.
“People in the beauty and fashion industry and the cosmetic industry, lots of that world has contacted me directly and indirectly and everyone is very touched by what she says about beauty because there’s no doubt that she is beautiful,” said McCabe.
“That expression you get from her eyes, the way she holds herself, she’s tall and she’s thin and the way she wears clothes and the way she walks into a room – she has this presence and this aura about her that is way beyond her skin. It really does challenge you in that regard. She has something going for her that’s very powerful and central to the core of her being and nothing to do with the superficiality and I think it’s a strong message for women of all ages.”
McCabe said she “tortured” herself more over a cover featuring a photo of baby Prince George from his christening.
“I did a sort of 1980s retro cover with the christening photo of baby George in an oval shape image with bunting across the top of them. I thought is everyone going to get the joke here?” she explained. “This is supposed to be fun and a throwback to a past era and I hope it doesn’t fall flat. I was really worried about that, that was the craziest thing I’ve done and you’ve got to remember I’ve put a naked 50 year old Deborah Hutton on the cover a few years ago, so I’ve done some pretty interesting and risky covers already. This one in the end didn’t feel that risky.”
McCabe is hopeful the cover will not only challenge society’s view on what beauty is but also encourage other magazines to think about what stories make good covers.
“I sit in enough meetings where the beauty industry says beauty is skin deep and those kinds of superficial lines are used around incredibly beautiful women and they make pronouncements of what is beauty and beauty is inner confidence and inner glow and all that kind of stuff and that’s always hard to buy for average women who aren’t born with high cheek bones and exotic looks,” she said.
“But Turia tells you that’s not the case. It’s not about the facade, it’s about what comes from within and she glows with it. I do think she’s going to have an interesting affect on this country, she’s 26 and she’s going to be in the public life for a long time and she’s going to talk about this stuff a lot and she’s going to challenge our thinking.
“I do hope it does encourage other magazines to think differently about the sorts of stories that make covers.”
Miranda Ward
I was one of those women who hasn’t bought the magazine in years but bought this issue having seen it being shared on Facebook and then on display in the supermarket. Let’s have more of it.
User ID not verified.
I want one too – I’m going out now to buy it. [Edited under Mumbrella’s content moderation policy]
User ID not verified.
Congratulations. To each and everyone involved. It’s a brave cover for Editor, publisher and model.
And good on those buying the magazine – a far greater story is in those covers than that about Deborah’s body or Price George’s pictures… It deserves to push circulation up.
User ID not verified.
“You’ve got to remember I’ve put a naked 50 year old Deborah Hutton on the cover a few years ago, so I’ve done some pretty interesting and risky covers already.”
WHOA WHOA, SLOW DOWN WITH THE RISKINESS
User ID not verified.
Disagree. It’s turning Turia Pitt into a freakshow to sell copies.
User ID not verified.
The women s weekly has always been a first class read, I have read it myself since I was a boy, when I regularly read my mother’s copy. She read W W and the British “Woman” magazine.
I admire this article, but I have a few opinions.
[quote] ” I’ve put a naked 50 year old Deborah Hutton on the cover a few years ago, so I’ve done some pretty interesting and risky covers already.”[ unquote]
The image of Hutton, rather like the recent images by Ella Bache, is of the theatrically contrived “self body wrap” nudes, where no more (in fact arguably less) of the naked body can actually be seen than would have been the case if she had worn a short skirt and bra.
[quote] “This one in the end didn’t feel that risky.” [unquote] Why? Did the risky feel that it supposedly had earlier hold you back, or fuel your decision you to use it?
[quote] “McCabe is hopeful the cover will not only challenge society’s view on what beauty is but also encourage other magazines to think about what stories make good covers.” [unquote]
How and why should this cover “challenge societies view on what beauty is”?
You cannot define or alter a view on beauty by comparing it to beauty. The inner beauty that you hint at is a kind of beauty, the obvious beauty conveyed by female pulchritude is also a kind of beauty.
A woman may display the most exquisite beauty whilst displaying appalling personal opinions and behaviors and vice versa. Mother Teresa, Edith Cavell, and Gladys Aylward were each extraordinarily beautiful women, but they would never be matched with the beauty of Grace Kelly, Simone Signoret or Lauren Bacall. There were/are those women who seem to have had both kinds of beauty, Emiline Pankhurst is one that comes to mind.
The superficial statements to which you refer are just that , superficial, they are also apologetic and pretend to hide (and at the same time reveal ) a higher regard, a grander taste in the proponent.
User ID not verified.
Maybe I’m getting old (I’ll be 33 this year) but I’ve started buying WW after reading it at a nail salon and being impressed with the feature articles inside which were less about tawdry US celebrities and more about real issues such as asylum seekers, climate change and the modern face of feminism.
Plus, cakes. Bravo to Helen and co for bucking the downward publications trend.
User ID not verified.
Whatever makes you feel better about milking her situation.
User ID not verified.
Helen is class.
User ID not verified.
OK. Today I went and bought a copy. Disappointing that the cover his hardly visible due to some other freebie being stuck to it.
User ID not verified.
WW’s publisher, the German company; Bauer Media Group, will love the profits they make out of this as a result I am sure.
User ID not verified.
Ad Person, what’s your point? “Company likes making a profit” is hardly a revelation (whatever the nationality).
If there’s a Mumbrella State The Obvious award, I think you just won it… 🙂
User ID not verified.
Congratulations to Helen and the team at the Women’s Weekly. I made a point of purchasing it.
For and foremost because I wanted to read about Turia, and it was also fantastic to see a magazine get as far away from that shocking Kardashian culture that has seeped into many parts of the media.
Well done.
User ID not verified.
That has generated a huge volume of awareness but what is that for? Whats next?
Details here – http://smallbusinessmarketingkit.tumblr.com/
User ID not verified.