Why we’re trying to break the old guard’s grip on awards judging
In this guest post, ADMA’s Kate Furey explains why the DM association is trying to break the “boys clubs” of awards judging
There’s always debate and cynicism around who judges advertising awards.
One of the biggest criticisms is that the same people end up on panels time and time again.
In our case the reasons this can happen sometimes are twofold. Firstly we want a few people who’ve judged before precisely because they have judged before. There should be consistency in the way entries are assessed because that’s what’s fairest, and having experienced judges helps keep a degree of uniformity and prevent Total Judging Anarchy. But secondly, although we always ask the industry to nominate who they think should be judging, the number of people who actually do tends to be small and unchanging from year to year. When the same people nominate the same people, you end up with a scarcity of new blood you can call in.
Unfortunately, when the faces on panels do start looking a bit familiar, the assumption is that cronyism/Sydney-centricity/boys club/[insert conspiracy theory here] is the culprit. I know, I get emails about it and so do the good peeps over at AWARD. They probably get them in Cannes, at The Echoes and Caples too.
Surprisingly, I think some of those complaints are fair. No-one really knows who’s been nominated, how many times, who by and why they were chosen in the end, do they? We could be pulling them out of thin air or playing agency bingo, for all you know.
We chewed over that even more than usual this year and started wondering whether there was a way to make our judge recruitment process more transparent and inclusive. Could we create something everyone can take part in, see more aspects of, encourage others to participate in and be satisfied was fair? Would that give us a bigger list of great people to choose from?
OgilvyOne took the brief. You can see what they came up with at www.admaawards.com.au until June 30 – an open online invitation to the direct marketing industry to nominate judges, which also lets registered voters see the most-nominated people in a tag cloud. You can’t vote for yourself, there’s a limit on the number of votes which any one person can cast for another to prevent branch stacking and, since it’s not intended to be a popularity contest, you won’t be able to see the total number of votes for anyone. The chairs of judges, Telstra’s Karen Ganschow and Mark Sydney’s Hamish Stewart, will also weigh it all up and have final say over who makes up their panels, but public sentiment will definitely play a far greater role.
It’s not Awards Glasnost yet by any stretch, but you’ll be able to login and see a lot more than you used to. It’s also a first for us, or anyone as far as I know, so the reaction is unpredictable. Most people will hopefully see that the intentions are genuine and treat the process in good faith, because they take the awards seriously want the best people making the decisions about who wins. Sure, there’ll be some of the usual argy-bargy with nominations too. $100 says a few japesters vote 1 for Draper to judge again this year, but despite the above mentioned accusations of boys-clubism, we eye old school pants men with some suspicion. He’s unlikely to get a tilt.
I don’t know if we’ve cracked it yet by the way – making things transparent, inclusive and fair and, ultimately, unearthing a broader list of potential judges. But I really hope we’ve gone at least part of the way and welcome feedback here or @admaawards for next time. Or, better yet, just cast your votes now.
Kate Furey is the Communications & Awards Director of the Australian Direct Marketing Association
I did an ADMA course last year. hearing the chief tutor say “being in advertising is pretty cool. getting to go to award shows, you feel like a rock star” made me want to throw up.
User ID not verified.
Great idea on paper. Brilliant.
But having gone to a few ADMA award nights and agency council events with an open mind, I’ve been sorely disappointed.
(Edited by Mumbrella)
User ID not verified.
Hi Anon.
Let’s tackle this now, shall we? I’m really glad you’ve brought it up.
I don’t think there is any bravery in what you’ve said. But neither is there any surprise in it – I do get it that people might think this and actually completely understand why.
(Edited by Mumbrella)
As for the results of the Awards, judges do the voting, chairs see the results, another company audits them, I observe and go get coffees. I’d really welcome you coming along to see this yourself, as it might clear up any misconceptions. Give me a call or send me an email about it anytime.
In the meantime, integrity in this job will continue to mean everything to me.
User ID not verified.
(Edited by Mumbrella)
User ID not verified.
Making popcorn…
User ID not verified.
Let’s face facts. I really should have judged at ADMA by now. I am obviously a highly regarded creative figure and yet I have never received a call from ADMA. Ever!
User ID not verified.
Shame ADMA shame! Come on kids, get onto the ADMA Awards website and vote for me!!!!
User ID not verified.
Now I’m intrigued as to why those comments got bounced by the good Doctor..
User ID not verified.
They were more personal rather than professional in nature, Beadacious.
Cheers,
Tim – Mumbrella
Get Nobby to chair it, he is Australia’s rep in Cannes where we cleaned up.
User ID not verified.
Just found out the Andy Awards crowdsourced their judges last year. Someone beat us to the punch after all.
Thanks for the tip off, @dekkard42. Glad I didn’t insist we did it first.
User ID not verified.
I must admit, I’ve always struggled with advertising awards. It’s akin to political parties sitting down and talking about each others policies and analysing each others advertising campaigns, they’re just sometimes too close to it. Can you get a few punters included or perhaps you’re going to, and I missed it. Apologies if you’ve got it covered or have addressed it.
User ID not verified.
Having read your unedited comment where you addressed the issue openly made me think about it. Rather than base my opinion on gossip I’m going to give it a chance.
The fact remains it’s still a good idea.
User ID not verified.
Kate, you mentioned you wouldn’t be able to see the total number of votes for anyone – when you search for someone and get back the result, there’s a number next to their name which looks suspiciously like the number of votes, given that it’s a big number for people who’s names are big, and a smaller number for others. Just so you know…
Interesting initiative though – be really keen to hear what the learnings off the back of it are.
User ID not verified.
Having sat through awards nights where all the boys give themselves a slap on the back its about time the judges were elected to by the judgees! Bring on it.
User ID not verified.