Honey Birdette accused of ‘soft porn’ as three ads deemed too sexual
Infamous lingerie brand Honey Birdette has fallen foul of the advertising watchdog yet again, this time for posters featuring multiple women.
One of the posters titled ‘Surrender to her command Candice’ has been labelled as “soft porn” for featuring two women in red lace lingerie standing face to face.
A complaint posted to Ad Standards said: “These are soft porn , girl on girl advertising in a public place for children to see. Highly suggestive highly inappropriate.”
Another complaint argued that the product itself isn’t offensive, however, the “suggestive sexual positions of the models” is “inline with the porn industry”.
“In an age of sexism and violence against women, I don’t think this is acceptable subliminal messaging to the young boys that will pass by or maybe sit in front of it (there are seats around),” another complaint said.
Honey Birdette responded to the complaints stating it was “a target” and questioned why women’s nipples can’t be shown in advertising but men’s can.
“How is it that men’s nipples do not warrant complaint, however a highly faded femalenipple that is covered by a lace bra can now lead to sexual assault.
“How offensive?! No child is looking at an image of a woman in lingerie and saying ‘I’m offended’. It’s a frightening development for the modern woman and Ad Standards decision is one we do not agree with. We are here to empower women and we are going to continue to do so.”
Another ad campaign of Honey Birdette’s has also been questioned. The ad features two women wearing a black lace bra as one straddles the other.
Similar to the ‘Candice’ campaign, complaints said the ad is “sexually explicit”, “pornographic” and too graphic for young boys to look at.
Ad Standards said that while the ads depict the women to be confident confident and comfortable and the ad didn’t suggest women were an object.
However, the ad watchdog said the “pose of the women is suggestive of an intimate or sexual relationship, and considered that such a pose would be considered not to treat sex with sensitivity”.
Ad Standards upheld the complaints, concluding that Honey Birdette did not treat the issue of sex, sexuality and nudity with sensitive to a broad audience which would include children.
Another version of Honey Birdette’s Sienna campaign, which featured a woman standing in black lingerie, was also banned for not treating the issue of sex, sexuality or nudity with sensitivity.
Need to start opening Mumbrella in incognito mode.
User ID not verified.
I might have to see a bit more before making my mind up on this one
User ID not verified.
I don’t think young boys need Honey Birdette ads in shopping centres to get their jollies these days. Any more than they did before shopping centres were even invented.
That is a ridiculous excuse. There are better if the ads’ existence in public places really needs to be talked about. (Cripes. Nearly
misspelled “public”…sorry Dr Freud).
User ID not verified.
Another day, another Honey Birdette “breaking news” article.
The only redeeming quality of these articles are the accompanying creatives pics that I quickly have to observe, get my jollies and then scroll past so that my female colleagues behind me don’t (correctly) judge me.
Also…..Waiting for the Wicked Camper monthly update – can’t wait to see what cheeky slogan they are in trouble for this month!
User ID not verified.
Boys see more at the beach and more from the young girls walking around the shopping centres than these ads.
User ID not verified.
I genuinely wonder if these were poses between a man and a woman, whether they would get the same degree of attention from the complainants?
User ID not verified.
Won’t somebody please think of the children!
User ID not verified.