ABC hits back over criticisms of its new lifestyle platform
The ABC has hit back at reports this morning its soon-to-launch lifestyle platform, ABC Life, will be designed to “replicate content that does well on commercial sites”.
Earlier this morning The Australian published an article suggesting a number of publishers and broadcasters were outraged over the ABC’s plans to launch a replica version of BuzzFeed, which would seek to compete with the commercial sector in areas such as recipes, sex and relationships, travel and fashion.
The commentary included statements from Minister for Communications Mitch Fifield, a spokesperson for Fairfax Media, NewsMediaWorks CEO Peter Miller, Junkee Media’s chief executive, Neil Ackland and Free to Air chief executive, Bridget Fair, were among those who commented on the plans, suggesting it did not fit within the ABC charter.
While the ABC did not comment at the time, it has since posted a comment on its website, arguing the reports had “promulgated incorrect information” based on nothing but anonymous quotes from ABC staff members.
“No authorised, discoverable ABC spokesperson has made the statements that the purpose of ABC Life is ‘to replicate content that does well on commercial sites’ or that it will be a ‘BuzzFeed page for the ABC’,” a spokesperson said.
“While the ABC does not disclose internal financial details, the figures put on the ABC Life budget have been grossly inflated. In a cluttered digital environment, fresh approaches are needed to ensure stories are created and shared in ways that are most useful to audiences. ABC Life will make a broad range of quality and engaging ABC content more easily accessible.
“The project has a small dedicated team and gives our existing employees located around Australia an opportunity to work on an exciting new digital project.”
ABC Life has not yet launched in market, but is funded by the ABC Content Fund, which was announced in March last year, seeking to help the ABC meet the changing needs of its audience. It will bring together content from ABC TV, ABC News, ABC regional and local, Triple J, Radio National ABC online and the broadcaster’s podcasts.
“The site will utilise ABC journalists and content makers from around metropolitan and regional Australia and bring together in one place curated content from across the ABC, as well as helping much-loved programs reach new audiences and showcasing distinctive ABC programming, supplemented by creative output from the ABC Life team,” the statement said.
“More information on this project will be announced soon, and we look forward to making it easier for audiences Australia-wide to discover and enjoy the huge variety of distinctive and informative content they expect from the ABC.”
Scott Spark, ABC Life Lead, said the website will be “free of advertiser interests”.
“ABC Life builds on the tradition of the ABC tapping into the everyday topics, issues and stories that matter to people,” Spark said.
It will launch on August 6.
For $1,100 million a year, originality, not imitation, might be expected.
User ID not verified.
The problem with most things written about the ABC is that they are written by so-called “journalists” who seem to think that the ABC is all about them and it should only be a “news organisation”. Well, it’s not. In fact the ABC Charter only mentions “news” in passing as one of the bits of content that should be run “to transmit to countries outside Australia” along with “entertainment and cultural enrichment”. No mention of domestic “news” at all. It does however require that the ABC “inform and entertain” and that’s obviously what it’s now trying to do with this new idea. OK it’s not original (the BBC started doing this over twenty years ago), but what is these days? Not much. So back-off all of those “journalists” who look down their noses at ordinary pursuits and let the ABC do the job that its Charter says it’s supposed to. The ABC’s television news ratings are down the tube, ABC Regional has been taken over and turned into a “news focused” (their words) service and the recent regional radio ratings show what a failure that has been. Maybe people are bored with having Donald Trump forced down their throats night after night and want something lighter from “our” ABC. Yes “journalists”, it’s “ours” not just “yours”.
User ID not verified.
Better for ABC to invest tax payer money into a proven concept than develop a ‘new idea’ which undoubtedly would be open to even more levels of scrutiny. Seemingly a lose-lose for the ABC on this one.
User ID not verified.
@ ex ABC.
Suggestion; Keep it sharp, crisp and to the point. [An old truism in advertising].
Ranting is a big negative.
User ID not verified.
Gosh. What an amazing development: News Ltd attacks ABC for introducing a site that might match what local radio covers.
Oh, and really kind of the Australian to do it all in defence of Buzzfeed and co.
Don’t suppose this could be the same News Ltd that has all those “lifestyle” sites, would it……?
In short, The Australian and its stalemates’ campaign against the ABC is boring and hopefully futile.
User ID not verified.
Yep Ken, under normal circumstances I’d agree with you. However if you take a look at Amanda Meade’s “rant” “The ABC in Turmoil” in the Guardian as an example of the way so-called “journalists” are attempting to crowd out all other points of view on this subject, I’ll think you’ll understand why I figured it was appropriate to go the other way this time! My apologies for not keeping it to thirty seconds (or is it six these days of short attention spans?)
User ID not verified.