BetEasy appoints GPY&R Melbourne following pitch

I wonder when these ‘sin’ accounts will become like cigarette accounts – lots of money to spend but an incredibly negative moral brand position for the agency??? I can hear the Glen McGrathesque comments now – but it was legal……

Well done GPY&R!

great attitude John. I actually enjoy a bet on the weekend.

So will these sin accounts include alcohol and automotive clients? They cause plenty of issues in the community also.

@Larry thanks – agree my attitude on this is a ripper as well – i enjoy a bet, a beer and a few other things on the side BUT doesn’t mean i advocate the notion of trying to make more people do it more often via advertising. It’s not about brand switching – it’s about getting occasional punters to punt more often….do you support that as an outcome?

IMHO booze ads should go they way of ciggie ads, know that takes a lot of bucks outta the ad game but you can’t argue for keeping booze ads on that point alone.

Cars – interesting one that but i think more people die from booze and depression in this country than cars will ever account for, doesn’t make it right but is a line in the sand.

I agree with John here. Online betting companies are pretty insidious and deserve the same level of approbation as fags and booze, for those people who like getting on their moral high horse. We may as well lump confectionery in there while we’re social engineering

Can’t see the argument on cars at all though

Sport + betting = corruption.