News

‘What could be more un-Australian than ripping us off?’: Coles and Woolworths were taken down by Reddit sleuths

As those in power at Coles and Woolworths are discovering, hell hath no fury like a bargain shopper scorned. Another lesson: Anything with the whiff of a good conspiracy moves at lightning speed on the internet.

The ACCC commenced separate proceedings in the Federal Court against Woolworths and Coles on Monday morning, alleging each supermarket sold supermarket stables at regular long-term prices (“for at least six months and in many cases for at least a year”), before pulling what used to be called ‘a swiftie’ on their customers.

After keeping pricing consistent for a given product, they would then jack up costs by at least 15% for a brief window – 22 days was one example – before declaring either a Woolworths ‘Prices Dropped’ or Coles ‘Down Down’ promotion, now offering the items at a price lower than the recent spike, but higher or exactly the same then the regular price shoppers had enjoyed for a year.

“Following many years of marketing campaigns by Woolworths and Coles, Australian consumers have come to understand that the ‘Prices Dropped’ and ‘Down Down’ promotions relate to a sustained reduction in the regular prices of supermarket products,” ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said.

“We allege that each of Woolworths and Coles breached the Australian Consumer Law by making misleading claims about discounts, when the discounts were, in fact, illusory.”

In total, this see-saw pricing occurred with 266 Woolworths products at different times across 20 months, and 245 products from Coles over 15 months.

Such duplicitous pricing for common items (Band-Aids, Coca Cola, Weet-Bix) was unlikely to go unnoticed by Australians in the middle of a cost-of-living crisis for lone, and it didn’t.

For at least the past year, scores of unhappy shoppers turned to social media to complain about these moves. Reddit threads chronicled the deceit, while bargain-hunting Facebook groups turned to the issue with a forensic lens.

ACCC chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said this breach was “brought to us before the commencement of the supermarket inquiry” earlier this year, with the watchdog receiving “tens of thousands of submissions” from the public regarding this bait and switch before April.

“We first identified this conduct because of contact from consumers,” she said.

“We then tracked social media and saw on X, Reddit and TikTok that hundreds of consumers were reporting prices that they did not consider were genuine.

“We followed that up with our own in-depth investigation using our compulsory powers.”

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese quickly reacted, announcing on Monday he is moving to introduce a mandatory code of conduct.

“My government said it would take action to ensure Australians are not paying one cent more than they should when they go to a supermarket,” Albanese said.

“Today we are launching the exposure draft for our new mandatory Food and Grocery Code as well as amendments to legislation we will introduce to parliament later this year,” adding that holding the duopoly to a voluntary code of conduct “hasn’t been good enough.”

Australian’s trust in Coles and Woolworths had already plummeted since allegations of price gouging played out in ugly Senate scenes in April, and this latest breach is unlikely to help things.

Coles was the fifth most-trusted brand in Australia last December. Fast-forward to March, and the supermarket fell to the ninth least-trusted — down, down a cool 221 places.  By June, Coles was the fourth least-trusted brand in the country.

Woolworths took longer to fall from grace, being seen as the second most-trusted brand in the country. They moved down to the 34th most-trusted in March, then collapsed to the fifth least-trusted just three months later.

According to crisis communications expert Sally Branson, the reputational damage is likely to linger.

“In the past, it has been a stretch for everyday shoppers to connect the cost of their weekly grocery shop to the complex mechanisms at play within large corporations like Coles and Woolworths,” she told Mumbrella.

“What, though, could be more un-Australian than ripping us off with Tim Tams?”

Branson said this latest controversy is just one of the supermarkets’ many issues that make them seem “un-Australian”.

“When your whole brand is built on a carefully crafted national image, there comes a tipping point when consumers have had enough,” she explains.

“All brands have a tipping point, and the big supermarkets could be dangerously close to it. Could it be the toothpaste that does it?

“The fragility of corporate reputation and the speed at which public sentiment can shift is not just a consideration for the big players. We are witnessing an excellent lesson for SMEs, too, who do not have the profit margin, the scale, the policy protection or the corporate buffers of the big players to protect them.

“What are you doing now to ensure you’re managing and protecting your reputation? A good first start is not offering “illusory” discounts, but the second is to operate in a way that you understand you won’t be given the multiple chances a big corporation gets.

“I’ve got a significant vested interest here, but I believe every single business should be planning for reputation management the way they plan for marketing, legal and finance.”

Branson also feels Albanese needs to go harder on the supermarket giants.

“If I were a PM with sliding approval ratings, I would use stronger words than ‘not good enough’ to describe this sort of alleged practice by our supermarkets,” she said.

“We’re facing the biggest cost-of-living pressures in generations. The disconnect between politicians, corporate profits and the financial struggles of everyday Australians is becoming increasingly apparent.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Get the latest media and marketing industry news (and views) direct to your inbox.

Sign up to the free Mumbrella newsletter now.

"*" indicates required fields

 

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up to our free daily update to get the latest in media and marketing.