HuffPo global boss: native advertising ‘adds value for everybody’
The Huffington Post executive overseeing its international operations has said native advertising and sponsored content can “add value for everybody” and, if done well, will not deceive readers.
As the news site edges closer to its launch in Australia – slated for the second quarter – executive editor international, Nicholas Sabloff, argued the focus should be on the quality of the content, not on who produced it.
Speaking to Mumbrella on the sidelines of the ad tech conference in Sydney yesterday, Sabloff conceded he could understand the debate surrounding native advertising but insisted it can benefit readers.
“When native advertising is done right it adds value for everybody,” he said. “It adds value for the reader. It should be a great piece of content, a great story, a great narrative, and not so much about who produced it.
“If it tells me a good story, if it resonates, if it gives me information that is useful and interesting, then that shouldn’t be a bad experience for the reader.”
The Huffington Post has a ‘Partner Studio’ to create sponsored stories, with Sabloff stressing editors will not be “tapped on the shoulder” and told to write such native content.
“That is a very important point to make,” he said. “It’s not something on the editorial side that I am producing.
“It’s not tapping an editor on the shoulder. That’s why we have a partner studio and a team that works on that.”
But Sabloff agreed that publishers need to be transparent and clearly mark native content.
“Sure I can understand the debate and that is why it’s so important the content is clearly marked,” he said. “It’s not a deception, it’s not about sneaking an advertisement in front of someone and pretending it’s editorial.
“It’s marked and clear to someone they are reading sponsored content. And if the quality of that content is interesting and tells an engaging story I think that is a valuable experience for the reader.”
Speaking at the conference, Sabloff said it was actively working towards the Australian launch. It will be The Huffington Post’s 14th market with an Arabic language edition and expansion into China and Mexico also on the horizon.
He highlighted figures that suggest by 2016, 66 per cent of global advertising spend will be outside of North America.
“We are following the money. The numbers are there, we need to follow them,” he told delegates.
“That’s where the money is and that’s where our growth will be in the future.”
He also stressed the need to work with an established and respected local player – The Huffington Post has partnered with Fairfax in Australia – in a bid to provide local knowledge.
Partnering with “powerhouse brands”, such as Le Monde in France and El Pais in Spain, will enable The Huffington Post to “do something bigger and faster than we could do ourselves”, Sabloff said.
“We want each of our editions to reflect the local audience. We don’t want it to be the Huffington Post France. We want it to be French Huffington Post.
“We want the DNA of the Huffington Post but we want it to be every bit as French as Le Monde and Le Figaro. That is key for us.”
Sabloff said an easy mistake to make in English speaking markets is to assume people are interested in the same content.
“We have found that is just not the case, even going across the border to Canada, or whether in the UK and here in Australia,” he said.
Steve Jones
i prefer the term “camouflaged advertising.”
User ID not verified.
Native Advertising is selling the credibility of the publication for very short term gain. Especially when advertisers realise the lack of attention their “content” is getting.
“On a typical article two-thirds of people exhibit more than 15 seconds of engagement, on native ad content that plummets to around one-third.”
http://time.com/12933/what-you.....-is-wrong/
User ID not verified.
I agree with 1292
personally I get quite annoyed at being ‘tricked’ into looking at some advertising piece because it was disguised as something closer to a news or information story
the difference being news and information are ‘supposed’ to be unbiased
native advertising is purely biased promotion
User ID not verified.
Huffington Post has for years made its money from writers writing articles for the site for no pay.
There are a small number that are paid to write for the site, but the bulk o writers are not paid.
I do not read publications that does not pay all of its writers.
User ID not verified.
I really agree to this post! Based with what I’ve read here http://www.lionleaf.com/blog/w.....vertising/, it states that “Native advertising is an online advertising method in which the advertiser attempts to gain attention by providing content in the context of the user’s experience.” It can certainly help our marketing strategies right?
But do you also agree that native advertising is sometimes ignored because some people don’t trust it?
Ken
User ID not verified.