Radio leads the way as media agency spend slips back
Advertising spend went backwards in May, according to Standard Media Index’s tracking of media agency spending on behalf of clients.
According to SMI estimates, clients spent $623.9m on advertising in May, a slight dip of 0.3% on the same month last year.
Radio was the best performer with a growth of 11.1%, while digital was up by 6.5% and ad-supported TV streaming was up 3.4%.
The worst performer was magazines, which were down 29.8%, while newspapers were down 5.2% and broadcast television was down 2.5%.
SMI does not track direct advertising and on average 50% of radio adspend is direct. What is the point?
How can magazines be down 30% every time this research has been announced since 2012, yet they still exist?
Because it’s a bullshit metric that exclude direct advertisers (many media have up to 60% of their revenue come direct) and it excludes 1 of the big agency groups (MediaBrands) who bill heaps on radio and print.
What metric do you suggest using instead then? As far as i’m aware SMI is still the most robust monthly dipstick
Surely there is more than one company that tracks advertising expenditure?