Aussie rock band seeks legal counsel after Super Bowl ad song apes its own
An Australian music act is seeking legal advice after an ad that ran during the Super Bowl featured music similar to one of the band’s songs.
The John Butler Trio was made aware by its fans through social media that the melody to a Oikos Greek yoghurt ad was very similar to the band’s song Zebra.
The ad features Full House actor John Stamos getting headbutted.
The band made a statement on its Facebook account:
Thank you everyone for making us aware of the Oikos Greek yogurt TV ad that aired during the Super Bowl yesterday featuring a song that sounds extremely similar to Zebra. John Butler and his management were not aware of this usage until yesterday, and we will be seeking advice as how to address the issue. JBT MGMT
The Yoghurt brand has made a statement following comments made by John Butler Trio fans on its Facebook account:
A question about the music in our Super Bowl commercial has been brought to our attention. We are working to fully understand and address the situation. We apologize for any concerns this has caused John Butler Trio’s band members and fans.
Oikos Greek yoghurt
John Butler Trio – Zebra
Snap!
User ID not verified.
wow sounds very very similiar!
User ID not verified.
Obvious copy.
User ID not verified.
Awkwardsville. Population = these guys http://www.oregonlive.com/port.....makes.html
User ID not verified.
This is the most blatant case of fraudulent advertising since my suit against the film, “The Never-Ending Story.”
User ID not verified.
This sounds more alike to me than the riff in Down Under sounds like Kookaburra Sits..etc. and Men at Work had a massive judgement against them.
Time to get the cheque book out Dannon!
User ID not verified.
I like the yoghurt one better.
User ID not verified.
Guys, I’d be asking for $1m, because JBT don’t do commercial!
User ID not verified.
Hey jp at 3:32. That is the most blatant case of plagiarism since Lionel Hutz said it in the Simpsons episode #4.8 “New Kid on the Block” in 1992
User ID not verified.
That’s definitely longer than the royalty free 8 second rule…
User ID not verified.
I think the blatant rip off was just a tactic to stop everyone commenting on how utterly shite the ad was.
Well played JBT. It worked a treat.
User ID not verified.
@Dave Goodfellow – there is no such thing as an ‘8 second rule’.
If you rip it off and they play it to a jury of peers who agree it sounds the same, you are busted, simple.
User ID not verified.
This is what happens when ad agencies use amatuers as a cheap option instead of going to a professional production company. Part of the cost you pay with a pro is insurance that things like this won’t happen. If it does happen they have the structures in place to assume all responsibility. This kid is the US that ripped off JBT will have no money or assets, so who do you think will get the bill? The agency.
Pay attention Oz agencies – one of you will be next the way you are all trying to cut costs….. cheaper is not always better.
User ID not verified.
Dave Goodfellow is wrong. Bill Job is correct. A piece of music does not have to even share one note with another pice of music for a jury to determine a piece of music looks, smells and sounds ‘like’ another piece of music. If that’s the case, then that’s considered ‘passing off’ and will cost you big bucks. So, to all the innocents out there, don’t listen to Goodfellow, listen to the Jobmeister.
User ID not verified.
Seriously!
User ID not verified.
Great news for JBT that this was a superbowl ad and not just some regional thing. Means they should make a few bucks off it. Keep an eye on the view stats of the video on YouTube, you can see the graph just starting to take off for views.
Great publicity for them, however there are a few YouTube comments (so it must be true) that this rif is itself ‘borrowed’ from somewhere else…
User ID not verified.
@Graham Grey
as an advertiser who had to deal with a bush-lawyering agency CEO seeking to can, at the 11th hour, a professional, fully licensed re-record because he suddenly thought it sounded too similar to the original recording, i have to disagree with you
the problem has nothing to do with who you use to record the track but everything to do with the various indeminities etc which are in place
methinks you are deliberately confusing the too. In my experience, producers and agencies contract away all liability for IP breaches to the client anyway!
User ID not verified.
The real breach of copyright here is the headbutt, The city of Glasgow should be suing over this cultural infringement.
JRJ
User ID not verified.
how is this different to the xfactor kid that has had a Pink song slightly adjusted for a re-record… it seems to be happening more often than not… Where is the creativity behind coming up with something new and original. Next thing you know they are going to be re-playing us classic films at the cinema pretending they are new release… oh wait, they are already doing that too (star wars, titanic etc)…
User ID not verified.
Woeful ad legal issue is a no brainer. Obviously only way this ad will get repeat viewings.
User ID not verified.