Agency apologises for racial ‘misunderstanding’ with job candidate
Sydney creative agency Banjo has apologised for a “misunderstanding” after a job applicant claimed she was told she was not suitable for the role because the agency already had too many “brown skin people”.
Banjo apologised on Thursday evening after the post from the applicant on Facebook began to circulate widely.
The Sri Lankan woman, Surungi Emily Hohol, posted that she was “livid and seriously irritated” after claiming she was told that she was not suitable for the role as the agency “already had two other Indian people”.
She claimed the interviewer said “the client might be alarmed by having three brown skin people attend a meeting”. The agency insists that a lighthearted comment, made in the context of a successful interview, was misunderstood.
The full post said:
The injustice of racism – I’m livid and seriously irritated by this.
Yesterday I had an interview at a creative agency in Sydney and was told that due to being brown and Indian (though I am Sri Lankan) and have lived in Australia for 27 years I wouldn’t be suitable for the role as they already had two other Indian people. Direct quote “the client might be alarmed by having three brown skin people attend a meeting”
Seriously what is wrong with people…
The comment quickly began to circulate with people expressing outrage at her alleged treatment.
Banjo releasing a statement to media and clients late on Thursday evening describing the situation as “an unfortunate misunderstanding”.
In the statement CEO Andrew Varasdi said the comment had been made to set the candidate at ease.
“The senior staff member who conducted what was a very positive interview, made a casual remark at the end of the interview, which was intended to set the person at ease. Unfortunately it was taken out of context and has since gained some notoriety on social media,” the statement said.
“Needless to say, the Banjo staff member is deeply upset by the incident, which occurred yesterday. There has been a lot of media attention on the issue of equality – including race, gender and sexual orientation, and age – in recent times and we acknowledge that emotions can run high.”
The full statement from Banjo:
In the course of expanding the account management team at Banjo, an unfortunate misunderstanding has occurred during an interview with a candidate, for which Banjo would like to offer an unreserved apology.
The senior staff member who conducted what was a very positive interview, made a casual remark at the end of the interview, which was intended to set the person at ease. Unfortunately it was taken out of context and has since gained some notoriety on social media.
Needless to say, the Banjo staff member is deeply upset by the incident, which occurred yesterday. There has been a lot of media attention on the issue of equality – including race, gender and sexual orientation, and age – in recent times and we acknowledge that emotions can run high.
Andrew Varasdi, Banjo Managing Director said: “The feedback I received was that the interview was a very positive one, reflected in an email sent immediately to the recruitment company that was complimentary of the candidate, and addressed the possibility to explore further opportunities with Banjo.
“Our position on this remains unchanged. When I learned of the situation I immediately contacted both the candidate and our staff member to offer my empathy and support. I have arranged to meet with the candidate first thing in the morning (Friday 5 August) to reassure her of our policies on recruitment.”
In Banjo’s seven-year history, the agency’s recruitment policy has always encompassed not only hiring the best possible talent, but also ensuring that the staff spans all ages, genders and ethnicities.
Varasdi said: “We couldn’t possibly deliver on our promise that our clients come first, if our own staff did not reflect the Australian community. We are always prepared to offer our clients the best advice to connect with their customers.”
Banjo’s current staff includes 50% women in senior management and 50% women overall, and half of the staff are from ethnic backgrounds including India, Asia, UK and South America.
“We are extremely proud of the make up of our talented staff, which is reflective of the diversity of Australia. We hope that we will be judged on our record, and that all candidates who consider joining us at Banjo will do so too,” Varasdi said.
Mumbrella understands that Varasdi was meeting with the candidate this morning to discuss the situation.
Mumbrella has also seen an email sent to the recruiter shortly after the interview in which the interviewer said the candidate was possibly right for the role, although the agency wanted to see more candidates.
“Loved her positive energy and I definitely think she has loads of experience,” the email said.
“So definitely (name removed) is on the cards, but we would also like to meet other candidates as well before we come to a decision.”
Define ‘taken out of context’. Its discriminatory by definition, nothing else.
User ID not verified.
Would be interesting to know what this ‘casual’ comment was and the context they are claiming made it acceptable. If it’s even along the lines of ‘3 brown skinned people in a meeting’ though, I can’t see how they can defend it?
User ID not verified.
Made that comment to make the candidate more at ease? They forgot to mention the “senior” staff member who made that comment was David Brent.
User ID not verified.
“Casual Remark”
“Misunderstanding”
“Taken out of context”
If that’s what the agency’s idea of an apology is, then it really is an agency with no idea at all.
User ID not verified.
“The senior staff member who conducted what was a very positive interview, made a casual***[ly racist]*** remark at the end of the interview, which was intended to set the person at ease. Unfortunately it was ***[seen for what it was]*** and has since gained some notoriety on social media,”
fixed that for them
User ID not verified.
Wow, just wow. Andrew, you have created a culture where somehow you have a staff member that thinks this sort of comment would put someone at ease. That’s the issue. You haven’t even apologised, instead you create excuses. Pathetic, bloody pathetic. And the whole “but 50% of our staff are from diverse backgrounds” is piss weak. It doesn’t mean that your agency can’t be just plain racist. Start leading. And there is only one victim here, and it ain’t your employee.
User ID not verified.
“… a casual remark at the end of the interview, which was intended to set the person at ease”
Casual racism… nice PR Banjo.
User ID not verified.
An apology seems totally inadequate in ‘explaining’ such a tactless (to say the least!) remark from someone presumably in a senior position in an ADVERTISING agency! (Not very reassuring for potential clients!)
User ID not verified.
I had many happy years at Banjo.
Angels, they ain’t.
Devils, neither.
But for all that, I never knew racism there. Ever.
Not at the partner level. They’ve happily hired Indonesian Catholics, Brazilian New Agers, French Jews, and ethnically Indian people who are Muslim, Hindu and (if memory serves) atheist. It was all part of the good stew.
And then, at the level of the two interviewing suits everyone’s discussing, there was never a hint of racisim. Why would there be?
Both these terrific women have Indian heritage. So they’re exceptionally aware of being made to feel isolated due to race. I know they both felt at home at Banjo, as do many other people from ethnic minority groups.
One of the ways they both used to handle the topic of race and ethnicity was – and think this is to their credit – by using humour.
I don’t know the full context of what was said, but I can bet it was about diffusing tension. That’s the style of both these professionals.
People who’ve never worked at, or worked with Banjo may like to give a screed. That’s fine. But don’t pretend you know the quality of the people concerned.
They’re bloody decent, extremely fair people. And it would be a thing of horror, and outright hypocrisy, for the blogocracy to judge these two women of colour for talking about colour.
And if you do care about the experience of “brown-skinnned” people working in an Anglo world, then you’ll do what you can, and say what you should, to support them, rather than sledge them.
User ID not verified.
This is all part of the general problem created by so called politically aware people, who demand a code of practice, but operate without a real charter or book of rules.
Say that there are too many men employed at agency X,Y or Z, or that the you are tired of the opinions of too many “white men,” and this is perfectly OK. Talk about white man’s bluster, or white man’s ignorance, and this is also fine, refer to just another old white man sounding off, without any fear whatsoever. But mention Brown, Black, Women, or Asians, and you are in deep shit from the onset.
The whole subject needs a dusting down and a reshuffle to get it into some semblance of order and sanity. People need to stop the knee jerk reactions, and start to loosen up about the obvious facts of life, some of us are tall, some short, some fat some thin, and each and every one of us has ethnicity, skin colour, hair and eye colour. I could be accurately described as, a fat old white man; in a room full of people, you could find me very quickly by that description.
User ID not verified.
I wonder if people actually consider the unspoken bias that a client may have if faced with ‘3 brown skinned people’? It might be true that clients could be apprehensive, sad to say.
User ID not verified.
There is nothing “unreserved” about that apology.
User ID not verified.
Agree. Racism is not about whether someone was malicious or not, but about whether it was said or done. Good people do bad stuff. The stuff is the issue, not the intent. On my band wagon this week about poor behaviour (values) after sexism and ageism issues in our industry still continue too. Clients need to know what kind of people they are hiring to deliver on their brand vision! Let’s keep standing up for the right thing I say.
User ID not verified.
The best message clients can send to Banjo is to put the business up for review and make a stand. Racism, sexism and any other form of discrimination is totally unacceptable. So is a half hearted reply by agency leadership who don’t even apologise profusely.
The only thing that agencies understand is the hard truth and consequences for poor performance and for behaviour the doesn’t reflect well on client partners.
Show leadership clients and show Banjo the door.
User ID not verified.
In a time of chestbeating, trumpet blowing and binary thought patterns, the only comment in this thread that even touches on being worth a pinch of crap is that from “Mr B once of Banjo”.
Read it, let your sanctimonious anxiety and privilege (the privilege of actually being completely ignorant to the circumstances and people involved) settle just for ten seconds, and entertain the thought just for a moment that the possibility exists to approach these sensitive topics in a functional, helpful way with approaches that might graze the surface of being controversial (before actually looking a little deeper… but that’s the hard stuff, isn’t it).
And if you can’t, but enjoy the humour, self-deprecation and polarising content of Louis CK, George Carlin et-al, then you’re just a damn hypocrite.
User ID not verified.
Nice call.
User ID not verified.
Interesting comments by Mr B which hints/suggests that the person who made the comment was of brown skin, that would certainly change the situation in my mind, especially if given what Mr B says is true and accurate. We can be very quick to jump on social-media-evoked-righteousness but, the whole story is often different to the sum of the tweets/posts.
User ID not verified.
This makes my blood boil. The response from CEO of the company makes it even worse. I wish this company had a facebook page that I could use to post my displeasure at this. But more importantly, I would like to know which of the clients this company has that this ‘senior staffer’ has accused of being racist enough to be troubled by three brown people attending meetings?
Nandos
Best&Less
AMP Capital
NSW WorkCover
Macquarie Center
Santos Energy
Purina
Rheem
Pacific Brands
Crown
Guardian
Ocean Keys Shopping Centre
Macquarie University
ProPlan
AHA NSW
2GB
Appea
Alinta
Purina Fancy Feast
Innocare
Hills.
Bible Society Live Light
Sydney.com Destination NSW
Simplicity Funerals
Pacific Fair Shopping Center
Bauer Media Group
Garden City Booragon
Macquarie Center
User ID not verified.
Thanks Otis.
User ID not verified.
“Needless to say, the Banjo staff member is deeply upset by the incident …” Yes, it was needless to say, because it’s not about the senior staff member and how s/he feels. I can’t think of a circumstance within the context of a job interview where the colour of a person’s skin should be mentioned, least of all to put someone “at ease”.
User ID not verified.
I originally posted a comment on Campaignbrief. My mistake.
I named an agency where I heard a racist remark made.
However, Campaignbrief decided to ‘alter’ my comment and take out the agencies name.
I named the agency and they replaced it with (Quite a few Sydney agencies come to mind).
I’m more offended with Campaignbriefs approach of political censorship to hide and protect a racist agency than the racist comment itself.
Obviously Campaignbrief protects racist agencies they are in bed with.
If Campaignbrief can manipulate real comments on real issues, we live in scary times.
I will be in touch with Mumbrella regarding the full details of the agency, the person involved soon.
From Campaignbrief:
Lets name names said:
Unfortunately racism is still an industry standard in Australia.
(Quite a few Sydney agencies) come to mind.
A despicable racist remark coated as a ‘joke’.
User ID not verified.
Open discrimination in its different forms openly occurs in many agencies. It can be in the form of racism, ageism or gender discrimination and more.
My personal favorite among several was “you have all the skills we are looking for and you are well suited for the role but we are looking for someone at a different stage of their career than you”. Or it was as blatant as: “you’ve had great career…don’t you think it’s time for you to move aside and give someone younger a go?”.
I also heard an open discussion regarding the merits of whether a man or woman was “better” for the role as a woman might not be able to fit in with a male dominated team. I objected and was simply shouted down.
None of this is rare and all too often it is considered to be a cultural norm that is openly accepted as frank and open discussion. These agencies believe they have every right to take these stances and that nobody has the right to over-ride business decisions regardless of its warped reasoning.
There are also no penalties for doing so. The Human Rights Commission incorporating the Anti Discrimination Commission prefer to mediate with the parties and try to find a form of resolution. They can not force an employer into mediation and employers can simply refuse. They are toothless tigers when it comes to enforce any kind of penalties The only alternative is a take it to court which takes considerable time and money. No consequences apart from a bit of bad PR which is quickly hosed down. And so it continues and will move off this page in days…..until it happens again.
User ID not verified.
In this current environment, I’d wager that if it were a man who had made that comment in that interview he’d be so fired.
User ID not verified.
Given Banjo’s flimsy “unreserved” apology which was explained by “casual remark”, “misunderstanding”, “out of context” caveats, i’m pretty sure Banjo would have mentioned the person making the remark about brown people, was in fact a brown person.
Either way, it doesnt matter –
It’s still racist to tell someone they aren’t suitable for a job becuase of the colour of their skin.
Doesn’t matter who says it or the intent.. its a racist staement
User ID not verified.
Sorrynotsorry
User ID not verified.
Explain yourself Otis.
User ID not verified.
Would they have said the same thing if it was a guy with brown skin ? Would they have said to a white person – I’m sorry I think 3 white guys in a room…. Casual racism has no place anywhere anytime. It’s only been a couple hundred years, maybe next century we’ll get it right.
User ID not verified.
Just because you’re a good person or have a multicultural workforce, doesn’t excuse you from making a racist slur, and worse still, in a job interview. When is it ok – never. Get a grip.
User ID not verified.
“…half of the staff are from ethnic backgrounds including India, Asia, UK and South America.”
Since when did UK classify as an ethnic background?
User ID not verified.
Nicely corrected. I think that catches the essence of the situation.
User ID not verified.
I have to admit to being a tad confused too Ethnic. Since when did India, Asia and South America classify as an ethnic background?
User ID not verified.
Mr B – using humour to deal with race or racism is never funny. It’s racism. They might be nice but what they did was racist. Plain and simple. The person/people responsible should be sacked IMO.
User ID not verified.
Indeed Brian, indeed.
User ID not verified.
Interesting comment from Mr B, who has hinted at some context which should remind us that there is always two sides. But having also once worked at Banjo as well, those who have been enclosed in those four walls will know that that agency is simply a bad hangover from the Singos days and there are some who simply haven’t left the past behind — hot air, boys club antics and, yep – you guessed it, inappropriate remarks!
User ID not verified.
Amazingly naive release from Banjo.
The agency response, not the racist comment, has made the incident immortal.
User ID not verified.
The interviewee and interviewer(s) are all from Indian backgrounds and……….are Facebook friends, maybe, just maybe this isn’t what you think it is!!
User ID not verified.
#banjosowhite
User ID not verified.
It’s irrelevant that the senior staff member didn’t mean to offend. They did. Some of my best friends are racists.
User ID not verified.
“… a casual remark at the end of the interview, which was intended to set the person at ease”
Not sure when this is ever alright…
Nice work, Banjo!
User ID not verified.
Agreed. The statement does nothing to reassure me that discrimination isn’t rife at Banjo.
User ID not verified.
Agency “apologises” for “misunderstanding”
It was not an apology. It was a sorry half-arsed justification for a racist remark. It was not an misunderstanding. She heard them loud and clear. What blows my mind is that they have the gall to blame their client for not wanting 3 brown people in the room. Which client? Do tell.
User ID not verified.
Well, its certainly racist to actually even bring up the colour of her skin. Because would they have if she wasn’t? Totally tone deaf release and apology that tries to excuse what was said.
User ID not verified.
So true… i don’t understand how a professional interview could allow for a casually racist comment. i feel that hiding behind the ‘context’ with no explanation shows the public response is all PR fluff. Where’s the real apology? Its apalling
User ID not verified.
Seems their crime was being too honest. People really think this doesn’t happen every day?
Stop dreaming, racism is everywhere, and sometimes it’s obvious.
User ID not verified.
Common guys, the interviewer, is governed by his up bringing
Being the 60 ‘s parents white aussie policy, Gouge Whitlam, Bill Kelty
And it passes down, from baby boomers.
The day these elders move in, it’s not going to solve the racial sadistic , ongoing slur on coloured people.
Politicians, media , put on these act, we are one, common mate
Wake up and smell the rises.
User ID not verified.
Still doesn’t excuse the comment. Others’ racism doesn’t excuse their own.
User ID not verified.
Spot on.
User ID not verified.
“unfortunate misunderstanding” and “unreserved apology” are two different things, Banjo. learn how to apologies properly
User ID not verified.
Having 3 brown people in a client meeting would certainly be awkward, especially in Sydney. In the real world we live in there is discrimination, no matter how educated a brown man/woman is we are always judged by our appearance and not by our education, character and expereince. Discrimanation could be crippling and should be exposed to the highest extent of the law.
User ID not verified.
@DavidBrent I hope more brown ppl could attend your client meetings. Maybe you should ask Google how its been done.
User ID not verified.
Exceptional whataboutery skills there M
User ID not verified.
For years I was told by headhunters and agencies that the clients don’t want to see any old people like me in meetings. It was infuriating and ageist as hell. But it was true. And I was “aged out”.
Is it possible these particular clients don’t want to see three people of brown skin appearance in a meeting? I can tell you, it’s totally possible.
I worked with many of the good people at Banjo when they were at Singos. You are never gonna get a more straight shooting and fair-minded group of people – all the way up to Verasdi at the top. All people say stupid things sometimes. The smart thing for this woman to do would have been to say at the time: “Are you serious?” and demand an explanation. The dumbest thing to do is go whinging to the court of social media.
User ID not verified.
Exceptional ad hominemism Rachel.
User ID not verified.
Brown people, now you know! The list is out!
User ID not verified.
@Pete Rush
Great victim blaming there mate.
User ID not verified.
And a small problem with geographic knowledge … Asia includes India.
User ID not verified.
Actually, I support what Pete Rush said. Maybe it is time to educate our clients. Make them understand you are bringing experience to the meeting table. Set the meeting scene, rather than swipe at agencies and employees. Yes?
User ID not verified.
Hopefully this PR nightmare will soon be rectified. Jokes at other’s expense are not for the corporate environment.
User ID not verified.