News

Daily Telegraph’s ‘Booze drugs dole rort’ article slammed as misleading by Press Council

News Corp’s The Daily Telegraph has been rebuked by the Australian Press Council over its article “Bludgers’ disgrace: Booze drugs dole rort” .

Last year’s April 26 article, which had a secondary headline: “Exclusive: Crooked doctors helping layabouts get out of finding a job”, reported an “investigation by the Department of Human Services” into “tens of thousands of bludgers are using a medical scam – claiming “illnesses” including drug and alcohol abuse – to get the dole without having to find a job.”

Following a complaint, The Daily Telegraph defended the article to the Council, arguing in the context of the article “reasonable readers would agree with the description of those who would prefer to abuse the social security system and enjoy taxpayers’ money rather than look for work as ‘dole grubs’ and ‘dole bludgers'”.

The Sydney tabloid claimed the “article’s focus was not to vilify welfare recipients but to focus public attention on the extent of the welfare burden on the federal budget”.

However the APC that while 70,000 Newstart Allowance, Parenting Payment and Youth Allowance recipients provided medical certificates, “it does not rationally follow that 70,000 were doll budgers”.

It was the Council’s view the Daily Telegraph had failed to take reasonable steps to ensure statements about the 70,000 being “dole bludgers” and “exploiting a loophole” were accurate and not misleading.

The Council also concluded the online article’s headline “Cynical bludge makes us sick: Dole grubs shirking work” read with the inaccurate statement about the 70,000 being dole bludgers was inaccurate and misleading and could not be regarded as reasonably fair or balanced.

On the headline “Crooked doctors helping layabouts get out of finding a job”, the Council also ruled it was misleading and inaccurate as the story did not sufficiently support the claim.

While The Daily Telegraph did amend the post in November 2016 to read “tens of thousands of dole recipients”, as opposed to 70,000, the Council considered this could have been published shortly after the publication was made aware of the complaint.

The Council ruled “the amendments did not provide sufficient remedial action”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Get the latest media and marketing industry news (and views) direct to your inbox.

Sign up to the free Mumbrella newsletter now.

 

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up to our free daily update to get the latest in media and marketing.