Dwarf, fat guy and chainsaw ad banned for fattism
An ad for an insurance website featuring a fat man, a dwarf and a chainsaw has been banned for demeaning fat people.
A scene in an ad for Compare Travel Insurance – when a masseuse shows disgust while massaging an obese man – discriminated against fat people, the Ad Standards Bureau has ruled.
However, the ad was found not to demean dwalves – because the dwalf is shown in a positive light.
The ad, created by Blow Communications, won Mumbrella’s Ad of the Month for December.
The ASB’s determination read: “The Board considered that the man of small stature is clearly presented as representing ‘risk’ and that this is presented as a desirable attribute for the advertised product.”
It continued: “The Board considered that the image of the man representing ‘big risk’ being massaged was demeaning to overweight people. The Board considered that the woman’s reaction to massaging this man is a reaction to his physique and physical attributes, rather than to the concept of ‘risk’.
The advertiser issued the following response:
For the record we would like to mention that we regret any offence taken to our ad campaign. It was intended to take a light hearted, comedic approach to demonstrating cutting risk down to size by taking out travel insurance. It was never intended to upset or offend anyone.
It is also worthwhile pointing out that the Compare Travel Insurance brand has positioned itself as ‘quirky’ and ‘entertaining’ from the launch of its public campaign in 2010. Since then, the brand has stood in stark contrast to most brands within the industry and its lighthearted approach has successfully highlighted the need for travel insurance. Given we have invested quite a lot of time and money into producing the ad it would be a great disappointment and loss to have it banned. We would like to work with the Advertising Standards Bureau to address any concerns and continue to run the campaign or a revised version if required.
Price comparison insurance companies have had a poor run with the ASB of late. An ad for iSelect was banned for featuring a man using a laptop in a hot tub in January.
FFS
User ID not verified.
I’m not usually in favour of banning ads but this one was pretty rank, and the humour was solely ‘ha ha fat people are disgusting’. It’s not quirky, it’s just bad.
User ID not verified.
“Vilifying” fat knackers is the least of the worries of this ad.
User ID not verified.
what a load of shite. honestly, people need to get a grip on what media does and doesn’t have a negative impact on society. idiots
User ID not verified.
The advertisement is repulsive. Banning the creators, and the product is manifestly insufficient – they should be tied to chairs and forced to watch it until they agree to never ever do anything quite so appalling, so grindingly horrible ever again. There may of course be a clue to their character in the name of the agency, though in this case I think Suck might be a better
User ID not verified.
The world has gone mad.
User ID not verified.
Ironically, the ad speaks of deeper truths…
Fat people are of greater risk of so many things… diabetes, heart disease… being offended…
User ID not verified.
Why does it matter if the ad is banned?
If an advertisement is only intended to be run for a couple of months – then it can be shown in December & January .. and is already off the air for weeks by the time it is ‘banned’ in mid-February.
So why does it matter if it is ‘banned’? The only life it would have by now is on the internet .. where it is still available.
In fact – the very fact it is ‘banned’ means some more air-time for the ad … as it will appear on the SMH & news sites – with a link to let people watch it on youtube.
Thus it appears the best strategy is to make an ad that is offensive and then complain yourself to give it some extra viewers.
Mac
User ID not verified.
Dwalf? Spellcheck Dr Mumbo!
User ID not verified.
Sorry, auto-spell check corrected ‘dwalves’ .
User ID not verified.
Can’t argue with that.
User ID not verified.
Too much for the fat people hey…STOP EATING! & watching TV so much, get off yo arse and do some stuff.
User ID not verified.
Actually there should be more discrimination against fat people, not less. It might convince fat people to turn over a new leaf, be healthier and not be a burden on the health system. Written by a former member of Bellybuilders who now swims and works out seven days a week.
User ID not verified.
We have a go at vilifying fat people, which I agree is not good for an ad compaign but as a society are fine with impossibly-attractive and scantily clad people to represent an idea. Is that not the same thing really. It is omittance of something we don’t want to view and deem unattractive.
User ID not verified.
What were they thinking?
User ID not verified.
Fat people need to stop watching so much TV and go for a walk. Good on Compare – I think the ad is awesome.
User ID not verified.