Facebook’s failures could lead to ‘the fall of digital advertising’
One Facebook scandal after another has dented trust in not only the vanity metrics of campaigns on the social network, but also in digital advertising itself, argues Michael Spencer.
Facebook’s most recent lawsuit to do with inflated video metrics goes to the bone of the immorality of digital advertising today, which is mostly ruled by Facebook and Google.
In fact, Facebook is facing legal action from a small group of advertisers who claim the tech giant knew for more than a year that there were problems with the way it measured viewership of video ads – which, by the way, there have been rumours around of for years.
This is how it looks:
Very interesting….great article and on the money I think
I didn’t know Mark Ritson was writing articles under a pseudonym and false profile pic.
Bring it on!
Utterly wrong.
Facebook will take a hit and be back to business as usual in a year.
The fall of Facebook advertising: unlikely but I guess it’s possible on their currently trajectory
The fall of Facebook-network advertising: Not in the next 5-10 years, if ever.
The fall of digital advertising: yeah, nah.
Everyone who paid attention to their social media metrics knew this was the case. Historically when you’ve exported your video metrics, it gave you the total viewership for greater than 3 seconds, and for 95% completion of video watch. Facebook certainly didn’t make it obvious but the only marketers who it was deceptive towards were the ones who didn’t bother to do their homework.
Would say they’ll take their kick to the groin, adjust their underpants and continue on toward a half trillion market cap a little wiser and more cautious. They’ve had a shambles of year but to frank, they’ve lost no audience. Seriously, none at all. As an advertiser, as long as audiences’ time is monopolized by the duopoly it’s remiss of me not to align budgets accordingly. If you’re a good advertiser you call out the bullshit for what it is, take joy in saying it to their face but don’t look at at reporting metrics, digital or otherwise, as absolutes.
Ummm…
I know FB doesn’t really make it easy to get your hands on honest numbers so it can be hard to know what’s really going on (especially in the AU market), but just because FB continues to grow in the developing world (it’s been at saturation in AU for years), we do know that, from an advertiser’s point of view, audiences and time spent *have* declined:
– Facebook removed 2.8 billion accounts in the last 12 months (because they were fake) – refer endgaget article from today
– This is in the context of an active monthly user base of 2.3 billion users in Q3 2018 – refer Statistica
– Zuckerberg admitted in January this year that time spent on FB had declined by 5% in aggregate Q4/Q3 2017 (or 24% per person according to Pivotal analysis)
– Q2 saw audience declines in Canada and the US
So, there are fake numbers, fake accounts, AND declining opportunities to see
Hey mate, it’s me, Nielsen Measurement. Notice you forgot to include me! That’s a shame too, because I am a third party verification on Australian userbase for both Facebook (and Instagram) and I show no declines in unique monthly users.
Would be swell if you’d make sure to include me next time – even though I don’t support your narrative!
Oh I haven’t forgotten you Nielsen Measurement. Remember that 18 months you overestimated FB video steams by 94%? And when you finally addressed the issue (more than eight months after my company queried the figures with you) streams dropped from just under 10 billion per month to around 550 million? And your independent measurement today, if I’m not mistaken, relies on FB provided figures doesn’t it? Yeah, I’m familiar with your data too and I was surprised that your stats guys didn’t think something was amiss when reported streams doubled from October to November 2015, and then trebled in December.
But that’s all beside the point. Declines are being observed. All you need to do is pay attention or, as the commentator below notes, google it.
Correction: 12 months
I like an internet comment thread where everyone goes off to google all the answers that agree with them. It’s tough to not be familiar with the bot issue, but what’s missed is most bots have an exceedingly short life span, typically disabled just after registration – our agency has IAS tracking, and our bot fraud is 0.3%. Annoying? Yes. Do I accept a small amount of wastage as the cost of doing business with any medium ever?
Time spent declining, they’ve been quite public with that as they used it as basis to drag down the visibility of media partners vs “friends” in feed, but as my mate Nielsen knows, Australian users still average 15 soulless hours on Facebook each month. I know Snapchat isn’t eating their lunch.
I don’t LOVE Facebook, I feel handcuffed because as you point it’s saturated in AU. Damn them, but my audience is there.
But, returning to the articles thesis: will their dramas bring about “the fall of digital advertising”? Nah.
Michael Spencer, brave of you to put your name to an article so embarrassingly off-base. This is completely unrealistic and paints with a brush so broad that it’s more of an industrial broom.
I shudder to think the conclusions you’ll make when you find out how inaccurate offline measurement is.
What the author choses to ignore is that the vast majority of digital advertising is in the pursuit of highly measurable performance metrics by some very sophisticated DR advertisers. From app installs to e-commerce website conversions. The worlds largest travel aggregator was recently reported as spending over $1b in one quarter on Google advertising alone. It does those marketers and their advisers and agencies a huge dis-service to suggest that a FB video metric reporting error from 2 years ago has somehow pulled the wool over the eyes of the entire industry, and continues to do so.
DR, given their campaign reach claims that exceed 100% … the wool is still in abundance.
I’m glad the article is only his “opinion” and more concerning it is coming from a marketing consultant. The author needs a rubber band on the wrist and snap it hard a number of times before writing another “opinion”.
Setting aside the issues with technologies, part of the problem in our industry are “consultants” and “experts” that are happy to evangelise their thoughts and opinions. Bleh and meh.
I would love to hear if the author have experienced himself the issues he quoted, how it affected his work and his customers, then garner others’ feedback to validate the “opinion” rather than regurgitating what the media is already talking about and present it like it’s a prophecy. #youarenotjesus