Fairfax posts $16.4m loss and gives first look at paywall takeup
Fairfax Media has this morning posted a $16.4m loss on the back further writedowns and its staff redundancy program.
Overall company revenue fell 8.2 per cent to $2.034bn, while the EBIDTA profit – earnings before interest, depreciation, taxation and amortisation – was between $359m and $365m.
The company this year recorded a further $444m in write downs from its regional, printing and agricultural business. The result is still a marked improvement on last year’s results which saw the company report a loss of $2.7bn, after write downs.
Fairfax also said that it now has 68,000 paid digital subscribers. It started paywalls for smh.com.au and theage.com.au on July 2.
This figure is higher than the 50,000 new subscribers rival News Corp confirmed across its tabloid mastheads late last month.
It also said it had 98,000 bundled print and digital subscribers.
At the time of posting, Fairfax shares has risen slightly to 59c, their highrest in a couple of months.
“This figure is higher than the 50,000 new subscribers rival News Corp confirmed across its tabloid mastheads late last month.”
Links to
“News Corp marks 100,000 digital subscriptions”
Was this done by a monkey on a typewriter?
User ID not verified.
not sure it’s an improvement in real terms – F12 result was crushed by impairment charges of 2.8b. Remove those and re-run the numbers.
User ID not verified.
Hi Encyclic,
As you’ll see from the 100,000 digital subscribers story. Half those subscribers were preexisting subscribers to The Australian’s ‘freeium’ paywall.
The story above makes the comparison above is between the 50,000 news+ subscribers to News’s metered paywall (which launched in May and June) and Fairfax’s metered paywall.
Cheers
Nic – Mumbrella
If you compare trading performance from continuing businesses the results are worse. If you look at the actual circulation revenue nearly all appears to have come from either price increases in print (either direct or through cutting discounts etc). Ad revenues are not supporting the audience claims and in metros and AFR the year’s ad revenue outcome is tragic.
All up, it looks like they are getting there on cost cuts alone but the business is dying at what might be a faster rate than last year.
User ID not verified.
Fairfax would surely have to be happy with those digital subscriber numbers, especially seeing as though the paywall was only launched recently. The fact that they already have more digital subscribers than News Plus, despite launching somewhat later, and with far less spent on advertising than News Plus (News ads are everywhere), I believe says something about the sort of digital content people are willing to pay for. Fairfax journalism translates well to a digital audience, whereas I don’t think you can say the same thing for tabloid-style journalism.
User ID not verified.
Well thank God they’ve got an old print guy from rural press in charge of the digital business! Brian McCarthy must be proud.
User ID not verified.
I’m surprised Fairfax have that many subscribers as their websites are just plain dull and uninspiring. I can;t see why they just cannot get it right. We need Fairfax to survive and prosper but teh future looks bleak.
User ID not verified.
Another big loss for Fairfax and they still haven’t purged their papers of the leftist crap which caused this crisis. Perhaps they should change their name from Fairfax Media to Ostrich Media.
User ID not verified.
I suppose Hoin prefers to read Fascist Media then.
User ID not verified.
Forgot to mention that subscriber numbers are only part of the picture. Price is what gives you revenue and from the data it appears the digital pricing is negligible. I suspect the same is true for News.
All of these guys are praying for an ad cycle upswing and simply ain’t going to get one. Certainly not in time to avoid cost cuts that, by the look of current patterns, will have tuened their once must-read products into chaff.
User ID not verified.
Why has Greg Hywood put in a print guy from rural press to head up the business? Sales are screaming
User ID not verified.
I think there were offerng $1 for the first month
User ID not verified.
Subscriptions were a Greg Hywood/Jack Matthews initiative.
They weren’t a bad combo ya know. Why they have now gone back to rural press approach who knows.
But I bet a book will be commissioned about it.
User ID not verified.
Hywood and Matthews were forced into paid content by the debacle of their traffic strategy. The Rural Press guys are focused on profit and it shows. No one is focused on the product anD tHat shows too.
User ID not verified.
These subscriber numbers relate to the first month worth of subscriptions, where the first month is $1, while the second and subsequent months are around $20. How many of these subscribers will drop off when $20 or so is billed to their credit card?
User ID not verified.