Opinion

The Shell Energy pitch situation might make life difficult for agency CEOs, but that’s what they’re paid to do

James Greet, co-founder of The Payback Project, argues that if your values don’t stop you from going green, then commercial interests should.

Last night I saw an awesome movie at the cinema: A Difficult Year. I won’t spoil the story, other than to say it began with footage of various French presidents over the years, each beginning a different national address with “____ has been a difficult year”.

Earlier in the day, I’d also read that the World Meteorological Organisation’s State of the Global Climate report confirms that 2023 broke every single climate record – not the kind of records we really want to break. Another difficult year and proof of progress of a climate crisis that is entirely human-made.

(Read the IPCC 2021 report approved by 195 governments – or at least the management summary if you don’t want to read the full 3,949 page report – to better understand how and why.)

Suffice to say, this human-made climate crisis is only going to make life more difficult – every year.

Now, I’m very much aware that many organisations across the wider agency world have a clear position on the climate crisis, acknowledging that it exists with varying levels of action in play, from basic offsetting of emissions to harder reduction activities.

Which is why Comms Declare’s position around the Shell creative pitch is a no-brainer. After all, if an agency acknowledges the existence of the climate crisis, why would you also promote an industry that’s fuelling it anyway?

As Darren Woolley observes, “fossil fuels are becoming the new tobacco”. So, if your values don’t stop you, then commercial interests should. Now, I get it might make life difficult for agency CEOs struggling to deliver the numbers, but then again, that’s what they’re paid to do: to embrace difficulties and find new ways, like engaging and supporting the emergence of newer players in this massive transition – not to hang on to the old world.

But to be honest this is really the tip of the looming iceberg – ‘scuse the pun.

Because, yesterday, I also saw Sunita Gloster’s Linkedin post from the AICD Governance summit; specifically, the panel conversation expressing concern about the falling confidence in directors to power the change in energy transition and climate governance, and the question posed by former CSIRO chief Larry Marshall: “How do we drive change without impacting profits?”

This has a direct and far broader impact on the future relevance and role of the marketing industry and its associated agency world. I don’t believe we can just ‘market’ our way greener out of this crisis.

For many marketing has only ever been in service of profitable growth. But, as the economist Kenneth E. Boulding once said: “Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist”.

This challenge of delivering perpetual profitable growth in a world of finite resources is a difficult reality that modern marketers and their communications associates will most likely have to face up to at some stage.

Yet only last week I read about the AANA’s single-minded agenda for their RESET 2024 conference – Growth. Seems the looming difficult future is not on the agenda just yet. Not here in Australia, anyway.

Elsewhere, however, it is.

There’s already great work being done overseas to help get the marketing industry’s head around this inconvenient truth and difficult challenge, with The Purpose Disruptors in London a leading example of this.

Started by former agency execs who’d realised “the better I am at my job the worse I am making the situation”, what began with the three of them meeting in a pub has turned into a growing movement with over 4,000 members from across the Marcomms industry and the birth and establishment of several powerful initiatives – including advertised emissions and the #changethebrief campaigns. Turning difficult conversations into progressive movement and real action.

We’ve yet to do the same in any impactful way here.

But we need to start. Beginning with addressing the difficult conversation about what can we do. To be honest this is something that needs leadership from the industry – CEOs of agencies, leading marketers, the industry bodies, to drive and endorse this.

Now we’re not going tell anyone what to do, how to run their businesses, who to pitch for or not. That’s up to them. If you want to continue with plan A, cool. Go for it.

But I know there are many across the industry who do believe we need a plan B.

A plan built around marketing that’s also in service of the long-term wellbeing of social (people) and environmental (planet) systems, not just profit. But many don’t know where to begin. Or, even how to start the conversation, or who to start it with. Indeed, they don’t want to be seen as ‘difficult’, when they question and challenge the status quo with their bosses.

What’s also true, is that ‘difficult’ only gets ‘more difficult’ over time, if not dealt with.

So, we’ve teamed up with Zali Steggall MP and gathered a panel from across the marketing and agency world to share their views at a Town Hall in a couple of weeks. And we’re inviting everyone from across the industry who dares to be difficult to come along, and be part of the start of a difficult conversation.

We’d love to see you there.

ADVERTISEMENT

Get the latest media and marketing industry news (and views) direct to your inbox.

Sign up to the free Mumbrella newsletter now.

"*" indicates required fields

 

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up to our free daily update to get the latest in media and marketing.