Nine board insists leadership team is ‘united’ amidst rumours CEO Sneesby is on the outer
The Nine board and CEO Mike Sneesby have insisted they are on the same page amidst a turbulent time for the media giant.
Following claims of alleged inappropriate behaviour by former news boss Darren Wick last week, Nine has launched an external investigation to be conducted by Intersection, while earlier this week a Nine spokesperson confirmed that the CEO signed off on an almost $1 million payment to Wick upon his retirement, saying Nine chair, Peter Costello, and the board “did not sign off on the settlement with Darren Wick; it was handled within our governance processes”, further clarifying, “Mike Sneesby signed off on it”.
However, according to the Sydney Morning Herald, Sneesby, chairman Peter Costello, and HR boss Vanessa Morley released a statement to staff on Thursday afternoon following a reported five-hour board meeting addressing the controversies.
“It is important we all acknowledge the trauma some of you have experienced in the past, and the distress and frustration the substance of these reports has caused. We also acknowledge and thank those who have come forward to share their experiences with us directly in the last two weeks, and the courage they have shown,” the statement read.
“The group leadership team is united with the board, and working closely, to ensure our workplace is one of respect, safety and inclusion.”
It was also reported that Nine will establish a dedicated hotline to report sexual harassment, will conduct an organisation-wide survey and that staff will undergo sexual harassment prevention training.
Intersection’s review will commence in the coming weeks, with findings to be completed by the end of July.
“We want to assure you we will be sharing the report findings and using these to reframe and rebuild the culture in our news and current affairs team,” Nine’s statement continued.
On the latest episode of the Mumbrellacast, recorded prior to Thursday’s board meeting, Mumbrella publisher Adam Lang said: “You would love to think that the board and the executives will unite together because they’ve all been fully informed along the way [and] made their choices and done so together.”
Listen to the full episode here.
Keep up to date with the latest in media and marketing
Dealing with this issue is a masterclass in politics 101. The playbook:
1. Ignore the fire
2. If you can’t ignore the fire, first line up as many people between you and the fire as possible.
3. Then take high noise, low outcome action. You want the fire to go away, not inflame it. Annouce an “inquiry” with a tightly defined terms of reference that will get you the outcome you want, to contain the fire, not fix it.
4. If the fire continues to burn, start throwing those people between you and the fire onto it and hope that controls it.
Name a political scandal that hasn’t played out like this.
Many of us are angry with this outcome, but it isn’t over. I’m not sure the board understands how intensly this fire is burning, right under their noses.
User ID not verified.
The terms of reference of Kate Jenkins’ (Intersection) investigation will be important.
Will she be able to interview board members about what they knew or didn’t know and why not? Will she look at how the Board has been observing its own policies of inclusiveness?
How deep do the dinosaur attitudes go in the organisation? For instance, is Fiona Dear, who worked with Wick for years, part of the old crowd, or the new broom?
User ID not verified.
This is the kiss of death in the sports world.
User ID not verified.
Have your say