Sepp Blatter’s gone – are FIFA’s troubles over?
With FIFA’s president of 17 years Sepp Blatter quitting overnight amid an ongoing corruption scandal Andrew Woodward says the organisation still has to address reputational issues.
Last night (Tuesday) Sydney time, I spent 45 minutes on the phone with a journalist from Reuters in Berlin discussing the FIFA and sponsors issue.
I awoke this morning at 5.30 Sydney time and by habit reached for the iPhone as I always do. There was an email from her asking “What’s your reaction to Blatter’s resignation?”. After checking that I wasn’t dreaming, I sent her a two word response “problem solved”.
It is simple as that.
The public and media have, quite rightly, got their scalp. Blatter had to go. Football gets the new beginning it needs. Certainly much will come down to who replaces Blatter but reform under anyone but him has a much greater chance of success.
Who won? Sponsors? No. Public, media and football family pressure (most notably from UEFA) won. Even Blatter in his announcement didn’t mention the sponsors.
In referring to his re-election Friday night Europe time when announcing his intentions today, he said: “This mandate does not seem to be supported by everybody in the world of football – supporters, clubs, players, those who inspire life in football, as much as we do at FIFA”.
The media organisations that paid FIFA $2.5 billion to televise the ‘beautiful game’ 2011 to 2014 didn’t rate a mention. Nor did the sponsors who put $1.6 billion in FIFA’s tin over the same period.
FIFA’s next big PR problem is the staging of the tournament in Qatar in 2022. Quite simply, this cannot proceed. This is a disaster on so many fronts. The public, media, football family and sponsors will demand action.
There are the serious questions about the bidding process; the venue construction program is killing many workers and, the integrity of the game is at stake with poor scheduling and a way less than optimal player and spectator experience.
FIFA could pull the rights today and give a new host seven years to prepare. That’s more than enough time. Most Olympics host cities only get seven years to organise the event which is many times more complex as a FIFA World Cup. Qatar will be a “PR crisis” for FIFA as long as it remains the host of the tournament.
There are many other issues for FIFA – the allocation of votes amongst nations; the distribution of funds and, general governance and transparency. These are issues for the game and not one sponsors will have much of an interest in.
FIFA’s short term problem is now solved. Sponsors have no reason whatsoever to wag their finger at FIFA or indeed tear up their sponsorship contract. Last week, I said such an action would be madness. After the events overnight, any such action would be utter lunacy.
If FIFA was a share market listed entity, its price would have sky-rocketed today as the market reacted. While its not a listed entity and there’s no share price, one thing did skyrocket today – the value of a sponsorship of the FIFA World Cup.
- Andrew, Woodward, sports marketing consultant and former global lead of Visa Inc’s brand and sponsorship communications.
Third article from Woodward in four days? Getting a bit lazy with the op-eds, Mumbrella.
User ID not verified.
Hi sub,
While we wouldn’t normally run something from the same person quite so frequently it’s been an interesting and evolving story which Andrew has been adding an interesting perspective to from a very relevant standpoint for our readers.
Cheers,
Alex – editor, Mumbrella
Maybe Mr Woodward is trying to justify his incredibly cynical “The people don’t care about corruption” in his last article. The people do care, ethics does matter and that’s why Blatter resigned. Doh!
As for his interesting, but impractical, prediction that Qatar will not proceed. No way! Sadly, as long as Sep hangs around FIFA will not have the guts to take it away from one of their small country members, their power base – where the votes are.
User ID not verified.
Last week, and again earlier this week, Woodward insisted that the public doesn’t care about corruption in FIFA.
Today he says that public pressure was one of the reasons why Blatter resigned, and that now the public and media “have, quite rightly, got their scalp”.
I find these two positions hard to reconcile.
User ID not verified.
Blatter got 133 votes….so there are clearly people in FIFA who think he is good for the organisation…they have to go next because they cannot be trusted to think for the “greater good of the game”.
User ID not verified.
Before the arrests in Switzerland it was reported that Lowy / FFA were going to vote for Blatter as they had in the past and in line with the Asian Group. Then when the vote took place post FBI bust Lowy takes the moral high ground and announces that they had voted against Blatter (implying that they had intended this all along).
When is the media going to call out Lowy and the FFA on this?
User ID not verified.