Why smart marketers should keep measurement simple

Marketing measurement has never been more complex.

At any given moment, there’s a new tool promising to revolutionise the way we quantify success. Panels. Platforms. MMM. MTA. Attention metrics. Incrementality tests. AI dashboards that claim to predict the future. Have I lost you with all this jargon yet?

Each of these approaches brings something to the table, but when they are all thrown into the mixing pot together they create a foul-tasting drool that weakens, not nourishes your marketing efforts.

It’s no wonder that many feel weak, despite having as much data as they could ever want to gorge on.

So how do you cut out the empty calories? Which tool do you trust? Which metric is most relevant? Do you need to adopt everything to keep up? Or is the constant churn distracting you from the fundamentals that actually move the needle?

This is the heart of the challenge: in a world saturated with data points, methodologies and vendors, marketers risk being swept away by noise.

The temptation is always to chase the next shiny solution – to bolt on another dashboard or pivot to the latest “must-have” measure. But this approach only works to fragment focus, drain resources and make it harder, not easier, to make educated decisions.

The false promise of “one-size-fits-all”

Every business has different measurement needs, there is no one-size fits all here. Each tool answers a specific question, but no single method gives you the full picture – no matter what those selling them may tell you.

A short-term attribution model should show which channel drove a conversion yesterday, but it won’t tell you how your brand equity is compounding for future growth.

An econometric model should reveal the broad levers of ROI, but it won’t help you to optimise your bids on keywords in real time.

Where I see marketers running into trouble is when they assume that because a new tool exists, it must be adopted wholesale. It’s like filling your garage with power tools you’ll never use, just in case.

The smarter approach is to understand what you’re building – your commercial and brand strategy – and then choose the tools that help you evaluate and adjust it.

The goal shouldn’t be to chase the latest trend. It’s to build a measurement system that is fit for your unique context, grounded in your objectives and robust enough to guide decisions across both the short and long term.

Holding your nerve in turbulent waters

The marketing industry, for better or for worse, thrives on hype cycles. As Mark Ritson has argued, too many marketers confuse novelty with progress, chasing shiny new tools while neglecting fundamentals. The pressure to follow the crowd can be immense.

But if you’re clear on your strategy, you don’t need to be swayed by every new promise of precision. I’ve seen too many teams spin their wheels because they’re reacting to noise instead of sticking to their plan.

It’s a classic conundrum – one company in a category trials a new platform and everyone feels the FOMO. Before you know it, half the team’s energy is spent on proving the validity of tools that don’t ladder back to what they’re trying to achieve – focus on their own growth drivers.

The antidote is simple, but not easy: stay grounded in your commercial objectives.

Ask: what are we trying to achieve? What timeframes matter most to our business? Which customer behaviours are critical to shift? Then use those answers to determine which measurement methods are relevant. Everything else is background noise.

Paul Sinkinson

The education gap

Measurement can be intimidating. There’s jargon, there’s maths, there’s a proliferation of vendors who each have their own acronyms. For many marketers it feels like a black box – particularly since many were trained in the creative arts, rather than the technical.

That’s a problem, because when people don’t understand the “how” of measurement they can’t interrogate results. They take metrics at face value, even when those metrics are partial, biased or misaligned with strategy. Worse, they can be misled into chasing short-term wins at the expense of long-term brand health.

Upskilling is the only way through. Every marketer today – not just analysts – needs a working fluency in measurement. You don’t need to run regressions yourself but you do need to know enough to ask the right questions. Why does this model assume X? What’s excluded from this dataset? How do we reconcile short-term results with long-term trends?

The companies that thrive are the ones where marketers, finance and strategy teams all share a common language of measurement and where education is ongoing, because the field is evolving every year.

Moving from fragmented metrics to a unified narrative

Fragmentation isn’t just a technical challenge; it’s an organisational one. Too often, different teams measure success differently. For example, while the digital team reports on clicks, the brand team reports on awareness. Alongside it all, finance is reporting on revenue.

Each metric may be valid, but they live in silos, and the story doesn’t connect.

A robust measurement strategy doesn’t just aggregate data – it creates a unified narrative that aligns the whole organisation. That’s where commercial measurement approaches come into their own: tying together disparate data sources and creating a single version of the truth that everyone can rally behind.

In the end cutting through the noise comes down to discipline – to resist hype, interrogate what a tool really tells you and stay focused on the metrics that matter.

The tools may change, the metrics may evolve but true marketing leadership should always be grounded in strategy, discipline and a clear eye on what really drives growth.

Related Content

News Oztam partners with Fetch on TV audience measurement

F.Y.I. Gumtree Group partners with Australian Community Media to create new cross-platform media and marketplace opportunities