WPP settles Carmel Williamson court case, says it has a ‘deep commitment to diversity’ following ‘boys club’ allegations
WPP has settled the court case brought against it by former executive Carmel Williamson, who alleged that a “boys club” culture and lack of support led to her being fired.
The settlement was reported in multiple outlets last month when it had ‘settled in principle’, meaning the deed was not finalised. The case was officially finalised this week, when Williamson filed a notice of discontinuance. In a comment provided to Mumbrella, WPP confirmed the case has been “amicably resolved” and it took the allegations seriously given its “deep commitment to diversity”.
“WPP AUNZ can confirm that issues raised by former executive, Ms Carmel Williamson, have been amicably resolved by both parties. On that basis, further legal action will not be proceeding,” a spokesperson said in a statement.
“WPP AUNZ took Ms Williamson’s allegations seriously given its deep commitment to diversity at board, executive and employee level.”
Williamson was seeking more than $400,000 in damages according to legal documents filed in the Federal Court in March. After just six months as managing director of Team Red, the bespoke agency set up for WPP client Vodafone, Williamson was dismissed.
Her time at the WPP agency, and consequent dismissal, left her humiliated, distressed, experiencing anxiety, and suffering from rashes on her neck and chest, loss of appetite, weight loss, sleeplessness and joint stiffness, according to court documents. Following her dismissal, Williamson began seeing a psychologist.
The executive was tasked with launching Team Red, which aimed to transfer all WPP work on the Vodafone account to one agency. But Williamson claimed other agencies, such as Wunderman Thompson (then JW Thompson), did not support the structural change, and resisted it.
WPP contested the case, acknowledging that while “disagreements developed” and there was a “lack of cooperation and coordination afforded to Team Red by other agencies”, then-boss, Mike Connaghan, attempted to resolve those issues by directing the agencies to cooperate with Team Red within a period of three months. Its defence stated that “[Williamson’s] outlook, which is that [WPP] ought to have disciplined or dismissed any executive who disagreed with, or displeased, her is unreasonable and unrealistic”.
Williamson alleged that her age and gender led her to be treated differently than other managing directors, which WPP denied. She wasn’t dismissed because she exercised a workplace right, the holding group countered, but because “she lost the confidence of the principal client of the agency she was appointed to manage”.
In addition to damages, Williamson wanted declarations that WPP breached the Fair Work Act, a fine to be handed down to the holding group, and her legal costs and interest paid.
The settlement follows a leadership switch up, with Jens Monsees beginning in the AUNZ CEO role in October. John Steedman was interim CEO when the case began, acting in a caretaker role until the company found a replacement for Connaghan, who departed WPP in October last year.
WPP media agency Mediacom continues to defend another general protections claim brought against it by former general manager Rob Moore, who claims he was made redundant because he disclosed a diagnosis of depression.
Upon settlement, the holding group thanked Williamson for her time at Team Red and said she was grateful for the chance to work for the company.
“WPP AUNZ thanks Ms Williamson for her service in connection with establishing the Team Red business in Australia as managing director. Ms Williamson is grateful to WPP AUNZ for the opportunity to be part of its diverse and talented leadership group,” the spokesperson said.
“Both WPP AUNZ and Ms Williamson are now focussed on moving forward with their respective business interests. The parties will be making no further comment.”
So probably a safe guess to say they offered at least a quarter of a mil to make this go away?
User ID not verified.
Clever job hiding this release late on a Friday….
User ID not verified.
well played to her if she got some $$ out of them.
As someone who had dealings with both her and her employers, I had sympathies for both sides of the argument but ultimately, WPP can afford it and she’ll be finding it hard to work much in the industry moving forward, so I’m happy for her if she came out of it with some cash
User ID not verified.
I rate Carmel!
User ID not verified.
Vodafone
User ID not verified.
Missing in all this is how one person’s viewpoint (the client) has led to the dismissal and total career destruction of another (Carmel)
No one ever questions if the client was correct in their assessment do they? Client is always right we often hear
Sometimes I feel a client is too large to lose, so if they complain (fairly or unfairly), the agency reacts by sacking the employee rather than backing or redeploying them
Its really interesting that after months and months of denials, and totally rejecting Carmel’s arguments, that they decided to pay a fair sum to make this go away. Not many principles involved here at all
User ID not verified.
So what have WPP done to remedy the ‘Boys Club’ situation then?
So much for taking diversity seriously.
User ID not verified.
WPP AUS and Vodafone AUS and two peas in a pod. Utterly reprehensible corporations run with the utmost disrespect for employees and anyone with talent who shows a new way forward. They are modern day dinosaurs trapped in tar pits of their own filth, future curiosities rather than modern day competitors.
User ID not verified.
They must wallow in the same tar pit as NewsCorp!
User ID not verified.
Stop with calling it ‘boys club’ it’s ‘straight white, private boys school club’ and it’s about time it ended. Goodbye with them and their bullying ways.
User ID not verified.
Diversity = numbers’ talk only! The place still feels far from inclusive. Even WW HR people just do the “by the book” stuff on the cases like this one – no choice to survive unless you yes – ing “The Club” team..
Good on Carmel to bring it all up to public attention. Companies and execs need to be hold accountable.
User ID not verified.
That is ? true
User ID not verified.