Wrigley’s TV ad angers banana industry
A television commercial promoting Wrigley’s Extra chewing gum is at the centre of outrage from Australia’s banana industry because of the ad’s depiction of the fruit as causing tooth decay.
Horticulture Australia has lodged a compliant with the Advertising Standards Bureau to either have the ad withdrawn or amended.
The industry body said the TV ad painted bananas under a negative light, likening it to other food products such as doughnuts.
David Chenu, Horticulture Australia domestic marketing manager, said: “Bananas are one of the healthiest fresh food products available. The current Wrigley’s commercial suggests that the foods it depicts in its commercial – a banana is one and a donut another – are the cause of plaque which then leads to tooth decay.
“To make this connection is both misleading and irresponsible. It is misleading because bananas can be masticated fully and cleaned from the mouth far better and easier than most foods. It is irresponsible because the communication that bananas are bad for you is contrary to what well-regarded nutritional research says.”
Chenu added that it had contacted The Wrigley Company, owner of the chewing gum brand, to voice its concern, but is yet to receive a response.
The Extra Food Creatures campaign first aired in 2007.
Wrigley corporate communications director Catherine Pemberton said the campaign was not a commentary on the various foods featured in its ads, which also includes coffee, pizza, raspberries and sushi, but “it is merely a random representation of foods that people commonly consume”.
“These, and most other foods contain carbohydrates which deliver energy, but also leave a sugar residue on teeth which ultimately, if not removed, can lead to the formation of plaque acid,” she said.
“The act of chewing Extra sugar free gum after eating, as demonstrated in the TVC, is to help wash away the food residue and help neutralise the plaque acids left after consumption.”
Never though of it like that when viewing the spot- but think its a pretty fair call.
User ID not verified.
Banana chewing gum. Problem solved.
User ID not verified.
Were they happy with the aids council of NSW’s depiction of banana’s? http://www.acondom.org/
User ID not verified.
Nice extra bit of promotion worked into Pemberton’s response.
User ID not verified.
I was wondering if there was going to be any reaction re the inclusion of the banana – it did strike me as odd.
User ID not verified.
Are bananas really that sensitive, or did they just see this as a free PR opportunity?
User ID not verified.
Well the banana industry was clearly ripe for a fight after the previous junk food issue (the Mars Bar ‘incident’).
This peeling from the industry group will certainly give Wrigley’s something to chew on …
They were bananas to include it….
User ID not verified.
Ripestuff – bravo
User ID not verified.
I am disgusted at the depiction of bananas as unhealthy. ANY food causes tooth decay if you DO NOT brush your teeth 3 times a day…did they research this…and were the test subjects people who they are sure brushed their teeth 3 times a day? Besides wasn’t their research recently that some types of artificial sweetner causes some types of cancer…Get with it….I have allergic reactions to artificial sweetner and have NEVER bought Wrigleys chewing gum ever since so THERE! I totally support Australian Banana’s call to NOT run this information or advertisement coz it’s full on B/S!
User ID not verified.
Nice PR leverage, if anyone picks up the story.
User ID not verified.
Ripestuff … good to see your education bore fruit!
User ID not verified.
Awww I love the Wrigley’s banana! He’s so cute and sneaky, like a little Nani Ninja. Tooth decay or otherwise, bananas hardly make for the most pleasant breath either, so I’m leaning towards the Oversensitive Basket at the moment.
Meanwhile, am I the only one unimpressed by Solo’s most recent can-crushing ad in which “Hip Looking Dude” kicks a can, misses the bin, then just leaves it there? Say what? Someone get Ian Kiernan on the line!
User ID not verified.
From a purely ‘communications’ point of view the banana was quite distracting.
Consumers don’t see random foods. They see bad stuff (Doughnuts, coffee etc) that Extra can clean up.
Then they see a banana – natures wonder food. It’s confusing!
The banana trips me up every time.
User ID not verified.
I instantly side against anyone in communications who uses the acronym “TVC”.
User ID not verified.
Funny that … I’m the same with “SHG”.
User ID not verified.