AWARD to review scam ads policy
The committee of AWARD, Australia’s main advertising awards body, will this week review its policy on scam ads.
The debate will take place at the AWARD committee meeting on Wednesday and follows a crackdown on scam ads in other parts of the world.
Scam ads are generally defined as ads that either did not run in paid media or were not signed off by clients. Entering a scam ad can give an agency or individual a creative an advantage over other entries because they have not had to meet a brief or go through an approval process.
This year has seen an increasing focus on scam ads globally. In the Middle East, the Dubai Lynx (organised by the Cannes Lions) saw several prizes withdrawn.
And after a fraudulent entry from DDB Brazil sparked a furore, the US-based One Show launched harsh new rules including a five year ban for agencies entering scam ads.
Last week, Cannes Lions issued a statement saying that its focus would be on individuals who transgressed rather than agencies.
Richard Maddocks, chairman of AWARD and ECD at Clemenger BBDO Sydney, told Mumbrella: “Our policy is based on individuals. Anyone found breaking the rules of entry may have work bearing their name deemed ineligible for entry for up to ten years. I’m fairly comfortable with that as a policy but because of The One Show and Cannes we will review that on Wednesday and discuss where we’re at.”
What about the great Australian ‘agency initiative’?
ie. Agencies paying for work to be done that the client OK’s.
Richard, how much did SEGA pay for ‘Offset the Evil’ for instance?
User ID not verified.
Firstly, I agree that scammers should be outed.
The whole thing does raise the question though: do we need an ‘Open Section’ for ‘Those Ads That Didn’t Quite Make It Through The Client Approvals Process’? Anyone who’s worked on the agency side knows the best creative often gets killed off or beaten out of shape by clients very quickly, so that what the consumer sees is actually a poor excuse for what was originally pitched.
(Easy clients, I know WHY this is the case, I’m just saying…)
So, just like the proposed Steroid Olympics, who’s up for an Open Creative category? We could end up seeing some far better ads which are more representative of the creative companies’ true creative abilities as a result.
User ID not verified.
Other Andrew … is that the “Client Refused Approval Proces”, or CRAP for short?
User ID not verified.
@Anon,
Nice – I do love a good acronym, but I think we’d actually see a higher standard in that category, so not sure about ‘CRAP’ in this case. 😉
I like your thinking though, so how about the ‘BACK’ Awards: Brilliants Ads Clients Killed? You could then have the BACK Edition etc etc
User ID not verified.
@OtherAndrew
If you want to be demonstrate pure, unfettered, creativity, there’s a job for that. It’s called ‘artist’. If you work in advertising you are bound to a commercial imperative and that implies client approval. If it’s not approved, it’s not an ad.
User ID not verified.
@Rascally,
Please don’t bring your rational, irrefutable arguments here while I’m trying to grandstand. It doesn’t help my cause.
I must agree that ‘if it’s not approved it’s not an ad’. The difference is, sometimes the reasons for the censorship/amendments are poor, and often more to do with people’s own insecurities and desire to ‘play it safe’ than whether or not it’s good for the brand.
Take the latest Toyota ‘Country Border Security’ ad (https://mumbrella.com.au/steve-anastasiadis-returns-to-saatchi-saatchi-as-4wd-border-patrol-spoof-is-unveiled-9819). Toyota could easily have knocked this back on the basis that it scores points with a segment of their target market by poking fun at other segments. I mean really, how many Toyota 4WD owners have never had a latte? But they didn’t knock it back, and the ad is one of the best I’ve seen in years.
Gutsy clients = better creative. And by gutsy, I don’t just mean approving anything the agencies throw at them, I also mean gutsy enough to tell the agency to ‘shove it’ when their proposal is rubbish. And let’s face it, there’s plenty of that too.
User ID not verified.
@OtherAndrew
Gutsy clients = better creative
I totally agree. I also think there is way too much link testing going on, that inevitably leads to watered down creative, and not enough instinctive decision making.
Plus I like the ‘pong’ game on your website. ;->
User ID not verified.
@Rascally,
Seems we don’t disagree on much after all… hardly as amusing to other readers as flaming each other in true mumbrella fashion, though.
Our site is due for an update but there’s a few people – mostly with more important things to do, incidentally – who I think would complain if we dropped Pong from the new site. If you’re into retro games and are based in Syd then you may enjoy our occasional ‘Arcade Thursdays’ featuring everything from Master System to Super NES, to Wii on the boardroom plasma. Yes, typical agency stuff but great fun… helps with the ‘unfettered creativity’ too. 😉
User ID not verified.