News

Ad with woman screaming as man puts her hand in scalding water banned by watchdog

A radio ad for a water system which features a man putting his partner’s hand in scalding water because she doesn’t believe how hot it is has been banned by the Ad Standards Board because of its suggestion of domestic violence.

In the ad, intended to be humorous, the woman screams in pain.

According to the ASB description of the ad (which Mumbrella has been unable to track down to hear at first hand): “A man describes the features of the Gleamous hot water system and toward the end we hear a woman scream as she has her hand placed in the water to test how hot it is. The man then says that the woman now believes him and that she is suing him.

Complaints received by theASB included: “The use of force on anyone and do them harm by scalding their hand to prove the point is abhorrent. Also there is the domestic violence issue, would he demonstrate this way with a male friend?”

The advertiser argued the ad was a ‘tongue in cheek response to someone not believing something’ and did not not present or portray violence.

Gleamous told the Board:

“The woman’s scream is simply there to highlight how hot the water is. The ad doesn’t infer we kept the hand there – there by burning the hand, it simply was meant to highlight that how with a Gleamous Hot Water system the water stays hot – but not burning hot.

“However as a touch of hyperbole and humour we suggest that the woman actually sues her boyfriend. In regards to the actual complaint; At no stage did we say he ‘forced’ her hand under the tap we simply say he ‘placed’ her hand under the tap.

“Regarding the suggestion ‘would he have done this to male friend?’ – he could have – we just wanted a male/female balance on the ad so there is a distinction of voices- very important for radio where pictures can‟t tell the story.”

The ASB said the “depicts a scenario that is intended to sound as if someone is in pain” and the additional comment that the girlfriend is now suing him suggests she was actually harmed.

It determined: “Although obviously the actor in the advertisement is not harmed, the Board considered that the advertisement is suggestive of violence against a woman and that this suggestion is not justified by the product or service being advertised.”

Finding the ad breached the Code the Board upheld the complaint and Gleamous Hot Water said it had decided to stop using the ad “until it is adjusted to suit parameters”.

Megan Reynolds

ADVERTISEMENT

Get the latest media and marketing industry news (and views) direct to your inbox.

Sign up to the free Mumbrella newsletter now.

 

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up to our free daily update to get the latest in media and marketing.