PETA’s ‘degrading’ portrayal of woman as a trapped dog okay, says ad watchdog
The Advertising Standards Board has dismissed complaints about a People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) ad featuring a woman portraying a dog stuck in a hot car, saying advertisers can use “whomever they wish” in their promotions and arguing gender, in this instance, is irrelevant.
Originally launched in 2012 for PETA UK, the ad features Italian model Elisabetta Canalis, pretending to be a dog who is stuck in a hot car, eventually dying of heatstroke.
The ad sees Canalis search for water, try to unlock the car door, and shake and kick the door before losing consciousness. The spot ends with the words “Dogs can suffer form heatstroke and die in a matter of minutes when left in a car on a warm day. Leave your dog at home.”
Complainants argued the ad was offensive as it was “sexist” and “degrading,” and equated the distressed woman to a dog.
“Portrayal of a woman suffering as an imprisoned dog is offensive,” another complainant said.
PETA responded to each complaint with an explanation of what the ad aimed to achieve and an assessment of whether it breached the AANA’s Code of Ethics.
“We note that the complaints received object to PETA’s use of a human to convey the distress experienced by dogs left to suffer and die in hot cars. At the outset, we would emphasise that the sole purpose of the advertisement is to raise awareness of the dangers of leaving dogs inside hot cars,” PETA said.
The organisation also said the woman was not depicted a certain way based on her gender, the ad did not depict violence, the ad was aired late to avoid distress for younger audiences and that it had no depiction of sex.
PETA described the complaints as “without merit.”
The ASB considered whether the ad vilified the woman based on her race, ethnicity, nationality, gender, age, sexual preference, religion, disability, mental illness or political belief.
In the ruling, the Board said it had recognised the woman and her behaviour was intended to “represent the equivalent distress experienced by a dog left locked inside a hot car” and that there was “no suggestion that the woman is herself equivalent to a dog or that she is trapped in a car because of her gender”.
The ad watchdog continued: “The Board noted that advertisers can use whomever they wish in their advertisements and considered that in this instance the use of a woman, and not a man, to represent a dog is not of itself discriminatory or vilifying to this, or any other, woman.”
A final decision by the Board said the ad did not employ sexual appeal, it did not vilify the woman, nor were her shorts and singlet inappropriate.
While the Board also considered concerns the woman was being tortured, it decided the level of distress was not “excessive” and was “relevant in the context of the advertising message”.
The most recent complaints are not the first time PETA has caused controversy or offence globally, with unsubtle ads including ‘Grace’ and ‘School Play’ for Thanksgiving – both of which were banned – and Everyday Dogs and Boyfriend Went Vegan.
Not degrading then why use a woman when out of male and female they are the degraded sex. The rate of women killed around the world due to family violence is much is higher than men and this ad portraying a woman as a dog is outrageous. We know that dogs are touted as mans best friend and trained to obey orders then why use a woman in such form to represent the obeying dog. So sad to see this Italian model agree to this abhorrent advertising and degration of women. This is the first time I saw this ad on free TV and I am saddened and outraged as to how it passed sensors. Tipping a male produced this ad???
User ID not verified.
This ad is unforgettable and effective. It shows exactly how cruel it is to leave a dog in what is essentially a blazing hot oven. I’m sure anyone who watches this will think twice before leaving their pup in a parked car, even for “just a minute.”
User ID not verified.
The ad is very well thought out, beautifully executed and makes total sense. In Katherine’s argument the men killed in action, 10,000 a day at the Somme alone, seem to be unimportant, but the fact is that dogs, like humans, are to be found in both male and female,in this case we assume it is a bitch, but of course, not a “Bitch.” There is one small irony, Et al, if we remove the Latin “al” from Elisabetta’s family name, we are left with Canis.
User ID not verified.
PETA actually did a similar male version of this as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBTGcWUf2ts
I really don’t see why it makes any difference the sex of the person in the car. The message is a good one
User ID not verified.
I’m with you Claire. Katherine, if you try hard enough you can come up with a theory for anything. I think you’re trying a little too hard here.
User ID not verified.
I really don’t see the point of using a hot/sweaty woman. It takes away from the shockingness of it. Not effective at all imo. I don’t see the point really. And saying “dogs die in cars etc” whilst pointing the camera at her. What did they expect was going to happen.
User ID not verified.
@Joe, I think the point is not that you see a hot/sweaty woman, but a human being under stress in a predicament in which some people are willing to leave a dog. Both dogs and humans come in male and female, I don’t believe that the gender is important, but it can’t be avoided in the case of either.
User ID not verified.
You do realize the derogatory term for a female is a bitch? Do you understand now why it is offensive to women.
User ID not verified.