Industry warns against ‘self-appointed activist ad review board with zero authority’
The Advertising Standards Bureau today became the latest organisation to warn of confusion over a self-appointed “Alcohol Advertising Review Board” created by health campaigners as a rival to the industry-supported body.
The ASB warned that the alternative review board would have no power to ban ads, and had no support from advertisers or media owners. It said: “The current system of resolving complaints about alcohol ads has the support of industry and uses an effective, robust and quick process to review ads and remove them quickly if required.”
The ASB warned that the new board “Has no power to remove ads, no independent view and has not sought support for its work from the industry.”
The Alcohol Advertising Review Board is based at the McCusker Centre for Action on Alcohol and Youth at Curtin University. The new body’s website uses similar language to the existing ASB, including offering a section offering “determination reports”. The design and terminology of the site might makes it appear to be an official body to somebody who arrives via search looking for where to complain about an ad. It also features a large image warning: Your children see these adverts”.
According to the site “ The advertisers responsible for advertisements which are the subject of complaints will be notified of the complaint in writing and invited to provide a written response within 7 working days (provided the advertiser can be identified and located). Non-response will not prevent the complaint being reviewed.”
It adds: “If the adjudicating Panel decide that the complaint is to be upheld, the Alcohol Advertising Review Board will contact the advertiser to request withdrawal or modification of the advertisement.”
However, other than the power to embarrass advertisers with bad publicity, the new body will not be able to compel advertisers to respond, or to obey its instructions.
The campaign group also includes a link to what it describes as the ten worst decisions under the Alcohol Beverage Advertising Code, which is administered by the ASB.
On Friday the Australian Association of National Advertisers warned:
“Make no mistake, this action by activists – to form an alternative complaints mechanism to the Advertising Standards Board and ABAC – is the action of those who want to tear the advertising complaints system. It has no power to enforce rulings, no independence, and no standing whatsoever in the community.
“At the moment if a member of the public lodges a complaint with the ASB and it is upheld there will be a satisfactory resolution with the advertisement removed by the advertiser and the media outlets. Setting up your own self-appointed adjudication system that has zero effectiveness or authority will simply confuse the public, reduce the effectiveness of the independent ASB and is therefore to the detriment of the Australian community.”
The new body scored an early PR victory with several newspapers covering it over the weekend including the SMH which headlined the launch as “Watchdog to keep booze ads away from children“.
The ASB is funded by the advertising industry with board members coming from within the community.

Is our industry full of cheats and liars or do people of honour who stand by their word still exist in business? In an article that first appeared in
Online trading is the next big thing says Rob Atkinson in a piece that first appeared in
Is the best way of being successful in Australia not be here at all? In a feature that first appeared in
From journos to ad execs and PRs, these days everyone seems to have a book in them. But what does it take to get published and will you actually make any money? In a feature that first appeared in
In an article that first appeared in
From dressing the part to playing the gatekeeper, Leo Burnett Sydney’s Susie Henry tells us how to make it as the face of adland in a piece that first appeared in 
Government funding bodies are lazy and decadent, says industry veteran Michael Thornhill but in a piece that first appeared in
Life is sweet for freelance writer Max Kitchen, but in a feature that first appeared in
First there was the Grand Prix. Next came the reported $500m bid for cricket rights, then Ten secured the 2014 winter Olympics. So, can sport save the ailing network? In a feature that first appeared in 

Cosmo’s Kate Leaver tells us how to bluff it in her job in a feature that first appeared in 


Comments
19 Mar 12
12:16 pm
I would like to report this “Mock Up”
19 Mar 12
1:34 pm
Looks like the children have been playing with Photoshop…
19 Mar 12
2:01 pm
activists? crap – you’re running scared dude
19 Mar 12
7:47 pm
So I opened up the Code and guess what was staring back at me.
The sodding Cancer Council. Are they on some prohibition crusade?
They really don’t have the first clue about what influences behaviour do they?
19 Mar 12
10:18 pm
The Cancer Council, which has run several extremely successful campaigns about, er, cancer, “really don’t have the first clue about what influences behaviour”? Yeah, sure.
When you’re reduced to describing the likes of the Cancer Council as activists with no authority, you have already lost the argument.
(Which is sad, I love booze ads.)
20 Mar 12
9:20 am
Bill
Would you mind furnishing a successful example of alcohol, or alcohol advertising prohibition – in fact any kind of prohibition.
Then an example of a baseless, self-appointed “watchdog” that has achieved the same?
Cheers
I remind the readers about the fantastic work of Cure Cancer. They cure cancer and invest in innovative research. Not fucking around with self-important committes with no discernible benefit to the issue or society. I donate to them, but am not involved with them.