Most social media users believe Schapelle is guilty and media making too much of story

An analysis of sentiment on Facebook and Twitter around Schapelle Corby suggests 46 per cent of people believe she is guilty, 22 per cent that she was innocent, with nearly a third (32 per cent) saying they did not care about the story at all.

Corby’s release from her Bali jail cell has sparked a wave of criticism on social media about Channel Seven’s alleged $1m to $3m payment for interview rights as well as Channel Nine’s move to pit its telemovie Schapelle against Seven’s docudrama about INXS.

Research by social media agency We Are Social shows a quarter (25 per cent) of all discussion focused on how the media is making too much of the story and ignoring more important stories such as the Victorian bushfires as a result.

Tweeters also hit out about Channel Seven’s reported deal with Corby for interview rights. Comedians, sports stars, news outlets, journalists and users making political statements accounted for the most retweeted comments.

Schapelle Tweet

Schapelle Tweet

Schapelle Tweet

Schapelle tweet

Even more people talking about Schapelle focused on the dilemma of having to choose between the first part of Nine’s telemovie Schapelle and Seven’s docudrama about Australian band INXS on Sunday.

The research shows 28 per cent of tweets about Corby focused on this conundrum presented by the networks on Sunday night, in which Seven won out with 1.9m viewers for INXS: Never Tear Us Apart, as Schapelle averaged 1.022m and was replayed on Monday to 241,000.

Schapelle Tweet

The analysis  found more than 110,000 messages about Corby between February 4 and 10, with the number growing every minute, with two-thirds (76 per cent) of conversations held on Twitter. Facebook accounted for just under a fifth (19 per cent) of Corby-related conversations, as mainstream news and forums each accounted for two per cent of discussion about the 36-year-old.

Schapelle Tweets

Channel Seven’s breakfast show Sunrise conducted a poll of its viewers after co-host David Koch criticised the network for paying Corby for an interview deal and found 54 per cent of viewers who voted believed she was guilty and 46 per cent said she was innocent.

Corby has also been the focus of an emerging meme using the hashtag #ThingsSchapelleMissed, as tweeters recall cultural events of the last nine years she was behind bars.

Brands that jumped on Schapelle’s media attention to promote their brands, such as Nandos call for her to try their peri-peri chicken provoked a divided response from consumers who called it either ‘advertising gold’ or a fail in poor taste.

“The social media response to Schapelle tells us that Australians love for real crime stories only matches their appetite for reality TV content. Twitter and Facebook are the conversation channels where the story unfolds,” noted We Are Social.

Megan Reynolds

Comments


  1. Travesty
    12 Feb 14
    2:00 pm

  2. Yes, it’s about time visual media woke up to this. People are sick of seeing whining losers and their pathetic families who give nothing positive to society and are rewarded for their tales of wrongdoing.

  3. Amanda
    12 Feb 14
    2:33 pm

  4. In stead of giving a convicted drug smuggler that nobody cares about $3million, channel 7 should be giving that money to the homeless. thats whats going to win them ratings, not an interview with a drug mule

  5. Gaye
    12 Feb 14
    4:48 pm

  6. They are making a hero out of this woman, it stinks. Giving her three million dollars, her and her family are probably thinking it was worth the nine years.

  7. christine fryer
    12 Feb 14
    10:19 pm

  8. I think its disgusting channel 7 is paying millions to a drug smuggler for her story .

  9. Bisho
    13 Feb 14
    7:04 am

  10. so sick of the media glorifying criminals. starting with the whole underbelly crap . not only do you get a movie or series made about you but you also now get paid for it. who says crime doesn’t pay.

  11. steve
    17 Feb 14
    1:39 pm

  12. Amazing how people are up in arms about Corby being able to get $$$ for telling her story. I bet if those who vote that she should get nohting would be amongst the first to sit down and read or watch the story. If they would turn to a different show, or simply not read the article, then they are at least true to their word, but I bet they won’t. So they, imo, are nothing more than hypocrites (sp?). There’s a saying that 80% of any population have an IQ that’s just average at best. In other words, looking at the numbers of most polls, the 80% / 20% rule seems to apply, 80% (nominal intelligence) are against Corby, 20% (above average intelligence) willing to give her the benefit of the doubt. I wish her all the best in the future and hope those that have acid opinions get their just desserts.