SMH Readers’ Editor: Our standards will get worse before they get better
Editorial standards in the Sydney Morning Herald will get worse before they get better, the newspaper’s Readers’ Editor has warned in a column today. And the paper’s reporters need to buy themselves a book on grammar and to study up on spelling, Judy Prisk added.
Prisk began the column by quoting a reader who complained that editorial standards had slumped since Fairfax outsourced sub-editing of the SMH and The Age to AAP’s Pagemasters.
Prisk – a former managing chief subeditor of the newspaper – wrote: “And fair enough. The thing is, though, it will almost certainly get worse before it gets better. Although Fairfax’s ‘newsroom of the future’ – a digital-first attitude to its journalism – began operating on Monday last week, naturally there is much work to do implementing it and training staff for it. This will take a few months.”
Prisk also pointed out that copy used to go through several levels of checking including layout subeditors, downtable subs and the a final round of proofreading. She said that journalists would now have to do so themselves – and that they would need to improve their grammar skills.
In other words, journalists can look forward to less time doing journalism.
It’s the last paragraph that is of concern. While accidental typos are of little concern, despite the self-righteous rantings of many readers, the fact that many journalists are graduating without decent grammar or vocabularies is a concern.
Knowing the difference between “birth” and “berth” is the difference between being poorly educated and poorly read, and decently educated and decently read. If you don’t know the difference, then your English (and likely your intelligence) simply isn’t of a sufficiently competent standard to be working in a communications field.
A dictionary or even automated spellchecker is no use, because it will not pick up “ignorance” errors.
gr8 rticl, im fully sic of peeps getin stuff rong.
Typos chip away at their professionalism but poor grammar chips away at their credibility. You would think that one of the requirements for being a qualified journalist is to at least get these two pillars of the written language right.
I guess when you pay peanuts, you get monkeys.
I recently received a CV from a junior copywriter who promised “maticulous attention to detail.” Fully sic.
The real value of editors is when they say: how can you justify this? Good editors push back on the hype and flim flam that too often passes through. Just look at the commonality of copy across papers on so many stories. The reason is that there is a depth of spin that is too readily accepted.
I don’t care how many subs get the axe. I do care that there are fewer and fewer editors who require that the reader has confidence that someone is standing between them and a truckload of crap from a “crisis management expert”.
Poor little Hugo,
What, proper writing is a distracting alternative to journalism? And ‘doing journalism’?
Oh, pleeeeez! (Unless you were being ‘ironic’).
The difference between knowing your shit and knowing you’re shit.
“learn by rote, if necessary, the difference between, say, phase and faze, their and there”
Yes, and for god’s sake flair and flare. The two are NOT interchangeable.
Laughable comment
Unfortunately poor use of language today is far more prevalent today than just on paper. You, don’t have to look any further than television interviews or language used around the office to see the increasingly incorrect usage of ‘myself’.
Why has everyone all of a sudden replaced ‘I’ and ‘’me’ with ‘myself’??? It makes no sense.
Dear Apostrophe — “Good editors push back on the hype and flim flam that too often passes through.” — There was a time when sub-editors had a lot of say on the quality and substance of articles. The introduction of computers coincided with subs being turned into production-line workers. Look at the job title again: sub-EDITOR, not subhuman.